Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular equals smooth over a perfect field

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a perfect field and let X be a finite-type k-scheme. Here regular means that X is locally Noetherian and every local ring OX,x is regular local; smooth over k means that X→Spec⁡k is smooth under the local-standard-smooth convention of Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations. Then X is regular⟺X→Spec⁡k is smooth. No reducedness, irreducibility, or closed-point restriction is imposed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A perfect field k, a finite-type k-scheme X, and the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

Locally finite type and finite type morphisms: a finite-type morphism is locally of finite type, so every point of X has an affine open neighbourhood U=Spec⁡A on which A is of finite type over k.

[F2]

Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras: an algebra of finite type over k is a quotient of a finite-variable polynomial k-algebra.

[F3]

Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are Noetherian by finite generators: for every field K and finite d≥0, K[x1,…,xd] is Noetherian, meaning each ideal has a finite generating list.

[F4]

Left and right Noetherian rings: a ring is left Noetherian when its left regular module is Noetherian.

[F5]

Noetherian modules: every submodule is finitely generated: a module is Noetherian when each submodule is finitely generated.

[F6]

Left, right and two-sided ideals: in a commutative ring, its ideals are exactly the submodules of its left regular module.

[F7]

Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes: a scheme is locally Noetherian when it has an affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings.

[F8]

Affine open subschemes: an open subscheme has the restricted structure sheaf OX∣U.

[F9]

The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is A_p: for p∈Spec⁡A, OSpec⁡A,p≅Ap.

[F10]

Regular points of locally Noetherian schemes: on a locally Noetherian scheme, a point is regular exactly when its local ring is regular local.

[F11]

regular noetherian ring: a commutative Noetherian ring is regular when every prime localization is regular local; the zero ring is regular vacuously.

[F12]

Geometrically regular algebras and geometrically regular fibres: a finite-type k-algebra A is geometrically regular when A⊗kK is a regular Noetherian ring for every finitely generated field extension K/k.

[F13]

Regular algebras over a perfect field are geometrically regular: assuming AC, a regular finite-type algebra over a perfect field remains a regular ring after tensoring with every field extension.

[F14]

Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres: under AC, for a finite-type k-algebra A, geometric regularity over k is equivalent to the structure map k→A being locally standard smooth.

[F15]

Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations: under AC, a finite-type scheme morphism is smooth when every source point has affine neighbourhoods on which the induced ring map is standard smooth at that point.

[F16]

Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps: locally standard smooth means that the map is standard smooth at every prime, where standard smoothness at a prime is checked after a further principal shrinking.

[F17]

Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps: the presentation definition allows c=0, and the case n=c=0 with localization element g=1 presents R over itself.

[F18]

The Axiom of Choice: AC asserts that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. It is declared here because [F13], [F14], and [F15] carry that assumption; no additional simultaneous choice or DC is used.

[F19]

embedding dimension and regular local ring: a nonzero Noetherian local ring is regular local exactly when its embedding dimension equals its Krull dimension.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

Finite-type affine charts. If X is empty, its local regularity and smoothness conditions are vacuous. Otherwise, by [F1], every point has an affine open neighbourhood U=Spec⁡A with A of finite type over k. By [F2], A≅k[t1,…,tn]/I for some finite n≥0 and ideal I. We consider all such affine charts, so no simultaneous choice of a chart at every point is made.

2.1F3F4F5F6F7F11step 1.1algebra

Noetherianity of the chart rings. Fix any chart from step 1.1 and write P=k[t1,…,tn]. Let J⊆A be an ideal and let J~ be its preimage under the quotient map P→A. By [F3], J~ has a finite generating list in P; the images of that list generate J because P→A is surjective. Thus every ideal of A is finitely generated. By [F4]–[F6], the left regular module of A is Noetherian and A is a Noetherian ring. The zero quotient A=0 is also Noetherian (its only ideal is generated by the finite list [0]) and is regular vacuously by [F11]; its spectrum is empty. Since these charts cover X, [F7] makes X locally Noetherian.

3.1F8F9F10F11step 2.1

Regularity transfers to each affine chart ring. Assume X is regular and fix U=Spec⁡A from step 1.1. For any p∈Spec⁡A, let x be its point in X. The restricted structure sheaf [F8] identifies the stalk on U with OX,x, and [F9] identifies it with Ap. Since X is locally Noetherian by step 2.1, [F10] and the regularity hypothesis make Ap regular local. We have already shown that A is Noetherian, so [F11] gives that A is a regular ring.

3.2F8F9F10F11F12F14F15F16step 2.1algebra

Smooth implies regular. Assume X→Spec⁡k is smooth. Fix any affine chart U=Spec⁡A. By [F15], each point of U has a neighborhood on which the structure map has a standard smooth presentation; restricting these neighborhoods within U and using [F16] shows that k→A is locally standard smooth. By [F14], A is geometrically regular over k. The finitely generated extension K=k is included in [F12], and the canonical isomorphism A⊗kk≅A therefore makes A a regular Noetherian ring. By [F11], every Ap is regular local; [F8]–[F10] identify this with regularity of each corresponding point of X. Since X is locally Noetherian by step 2.1, X is regular. This proves the reverse implication.

4.1F11F12F13step 3.1given

A regular chart is geometrically regular. Let U=Spec⁡A be any chart and assume X is regular. Step 3.1 makes A a regular finite-type k-algebra. For every finitely generated field extension K/k, [F13] gives that A⊗kK is regular, and [F11] includes Noetherianity in the meaning of regular ring. Hence the defining condition [F12] holds and A is geometrically regular over k.

5.1F14step 4.1

Geometric regularity gives local standard smoothness. By [F14], the structure map k→A for each chart in step 4.1 is locally standard smooth.

6.1F15step 1.1step 5.1

Regular implies smooth. At each point of X, take a chart from step 1.1. The local standard-smooth presentations supplied by step 5.1 make the morphism smooth at that point under [F15]. This proves the forward implication at all points, including nonclosed points.

7.1

Boundary and nilpotent checks. For X=Spec⁡k, the local ring is k, with maximal ideal zero and both dimension and embedding dimension zero, so it is regular by [F19]. The map k→k has the standard smooth presentation with n=c=0 and g=1 by [F17], so X is smooth. For Dk=Spec⁡(k[ϵ]/(ϵ2)), the unique prime is (ϵ) because every prime contains the nilpotent ϵ and an element with nonzero constant term is a unit. The ring is two-dimensional over k, hence Noetherian; its local dimension is zero, whereas (ϵ)/(ϵ)2 is one-dimensional, so its embedding dimension is one and [F19] shows it is not regular. Consequently it is not geometrically regular, since [F12] includes the extension K=k. By [F14] its structure map is not locally standard smooth, and [F15] says it is not smooth. Thus nilpotents are retained, and the theorem does not silently replace Dk by its reduced point. Step 6.1 proves regular ⇒ smooth, while step 3.2 proves smooth ⇒ regular. AC is used only through the stated suppliers [F13]–[F15]; the proof treats one chart or point at a time, and no DC is invoked. [F12, F13, F14, F15, F17, F18, F19, step 6.1, step 3.2, given, algebra] □

Source qualification

Stacks Project Lemma 33.12.3 (tag 038V), lines 23–38, gives the affine-chart characterization of geometric regularity and its finite purely inseparable field tests. Lemma 33.12.6 (tag 038X), lines 23–28, proves that geometric regularity at a point is equivalent to smoothness there for a locally finite-type scheme. The latter statement does not assume perfectness; perfectness enters this item through the regular-algebra scalar-extension theorem. Stacks Algebra Lemma 10.166.1 (tag 0381), lines 22–36, gives the finitely-generated-field versus finite-purely-inseparable test. The stronger arbitrary-field scalar-extension assertion used here is supplied by the fully proved library item Regular algebras over a perfect field are geometrically regular via Field tests for geometric regularity.

Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Chapter 10 supplement, §f, item 10.64 (printed p. 18 / PDF page 18), states that a regular variety over a perfect field is smooth and that a smooth variety is regular. Milne's “variety” conventions are narrower than the present claim about arbitrary finite-type schemes and do not include this proof's nonreduced dual-number boundary; that citation is corroboration for the classical case, not a substitute for the scheme-level chart argument above.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

75 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources