How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Regular equals smooth over a perfect field
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a perfect field and let be a finite-type -scheme. Here regular means that is locally Noetherian and every local ring is regular local; smooth over means that is smooth under the local-standard-smooth convention of Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations. Then No reducedness, irreducibility, or closed-point restriction is imposed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A perfect field , a finite-type -scheme , and the Axiom of Choice.
Locally finite type and finite type morphisms: a finite-type morphism is locally of finite type, so every point of has an affine open neighbourhood on which is of finite type over .
Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras: an algebra of finite type over is a quotient of a finite-variable polynomial -algebra.
Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are Noetherian by finite generators: for every field and finite , is Noetherian, meaning each ideal has a finite generating list.
Left and right Noetherian rings: a ring is left Noetherian when its left regular module is Noetherian.
Noetherian modules: every submodule is finitely generated: a module is Noetherian when each submodule is finitely generated.
Left, right and two-sided ideals: in a commutative ring, its ideals are exactly the submodules of its left regular module.
Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes: a scheme is locally Noetherian when it has an affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings.
Affine open subschemes: an open subscheme has the restricted structure sheaf .
Regular points of locally Noetherian schemes: on a locally Noetherian scheme, a point is regular exactly when its local ring is regular local.
regular noetherian ring: a commutative Noetherian ring is regular when every prime localization is regular local; the zero ring is regular vacuously.
Geometrically regular algebras and geometrically regular fibres: a finite-type -algebra is geometrically regular when is a regular Noetherian ring for every finitely generated field extension .
Regular algebras over a perfect field are geometrically regular: assuming AC, a regular finite-type algebra over a perfect field remains a regular ring after tensoring with every field extension.
Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres: under AC, for a finite-type -algebra , geometric regularity over is equivalent to the structure map being locally standard smooth.
Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations: under AC, a finite-type scheme morphism is smooth when every source point has affine neighbourhoods on which the induced ring map is standard smooth at that point.
Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps: locally standard smooth means that the map is standard smooth at every prime, where standard smoothness at a prime is checked after a further principal shrinking.
Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps: the presentation definition allows , and the case with localization element presents over itself.
The Axiom of Choice: AC asserts that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. It is declared here because [F13], [F14], and [F15] carry that assumption; no additional simultaneous choice or DC is used.
embedding dimension and regular local ring: a nonzero Noetherian local ring is regular local exactly when its embedding dimension equals its Krull dimension.
Proof
Finite-type affine charts. If is empty, its local regularity and smoothness conditions are vacuous. Otherwise, by [F1], every point has an affine open neighbourhood with of finite type over . By [F2], for some finite and ideal . We consider all such affine charts, so no simultaneous choice of a chart at every point is made.
Noetherianity of the chart rings. Fix any chart from step 1.1 and write . Let be an ideal and let be its preimage under the quotient map . By [F3], has a finite generating list in ; the images of that list generate because is surjective. Thus every ideal of is finitely generated. By [F4]–[F6], the left regular module of is Noetherian and is a Noetherian ring. The zero quotient is also Noetherian (its only ideal is generated by the finite list ) and is regular vacuously by [F11]; its spectrum is empty. Since these charts cover , [F7] makes locally Noetherian.
Regularity transfers to each affine chart ring. Assume is regular and fix from step 1.1. For any , let be its point in . The restricted structure sheaf [F8] identifies the stalk on with , and [F9] identifies it with . Since is locally Noetherian by step 2.1, [F10] and the regularity hypothesis make regular local. We have already shown that is Noetherian, so [F11] gives that is a regular ring.
Smooth implies regular. Assume is smooth. Fix any affine chart . By [F15], each point of has a neighborhood on which the structure map has a standard smooth presentation; restricting these neighborhoods within and using [F16] shows that is locally standard smooth. By [F14], is geometrically regular over . The finitely generated extension is included in [F12], and the canonical isomorphism therefore makes a regular Noetherian ring. By [F11], every is regular local; [F8]–[F10] identify this with regularity of each corresponding point of . Since is locally Noetherian by step 2.1, is regular. This proves the reverse implication.
A regular chart is geometrically regular. Let be any chart and assume is regular. Step 3.1 makes a regular finite-type -algebra. For every finitely generated field extension , [F13] gives that is regular, and [F11] includes Noetherianity in the meaning of regular ring. Hence the defining condition [F12] holds and is geometrically regular over .
Geometric regularity gives local standard smoothness. By [F14], the structure map for each chart in step 4.1 is locally standard smooth.
Regular implies smooth. At each point of , take a chart from step 1.1. The local standard-smooth presentations supplied by step 5.1 make the morphism smooth at that point under [F15]. This proves the forward implication at all points, including nonclosed points.
Boundary and nilpotent checks. For , the local ring is , with maximal ideal zero and both dimension and embedding dimension zero, so it is regular by [F19]. The map has the standard smooth presentation with and by [F17], so is smooth. For , the unique prime is because every prime contains the nilpotent and an element with nonzero constant term is a unit. The ring is two-dimensional over , hence Noetherian; its local dimension is zero, whereas is one-dimensional, so its embedding dimension is one and [F19] shows it is not regular. Consequently it is not geometrically regular, since [F12] includes the extension . By [F14] its structure map is not locally standard smooth, and [F15] says it is not smooth. Thus nilpotents are retained, and the theorem does not silently replace by its reduced point. Step 6.1 proves regular smooth, while step 3.2 proves smooth regular. AC is used only through the stated suppliers [F13]–[F15]; the proof treats one chart or point at a time, and no DC is invoked. [F12, F13, F14, F15, F17, F18, F19, step 6.1, step 3.2, given, algebra]
Source qualification
Stacks Project Lemma 33.12.3 (tag 038V), lines 23–38, gives the affine-chart characterization of geometric regularity and its finite purely inseparable field tests. Lemma 33.12.6 (tag 038X), lines 23–28, proves that geometric regularity at a point is equivalent to smoothness there for a locally finite-type scheme. The latter statement does not assume perfectness; perfectness enters this item through the regular-algebra scalar-extension theorem. Stacks Algebra Lemma 10.166.1 (tag 0381), lines 22–36, gives the finitely-generated-field versus finite-purely-inseparable test. The stronger arbitrary-field scalar-extension assertion used here is supplied by the fully proved library item Regular algebras over a perfect field are geometrically regular via Field tests for geometric regularity.
Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Chapter 10 supplement, §f, item 10.64 (printed p. 18 / PDF page 18), states that a regular variety over a perfect field is smooth and that a smooth variety is regular. Milne's “variety” conventions are narrower than the present claim about arbitrary finite-type schemes and do not include this proof's nonreduced dual-number boundary; that citation is corroboration for the classical case, not a substitute for the scheme-level chart argument above.
Depends on
- Affine open subschemes
- Geometrically regular algebras and geometrically regular fibres
- Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps
- The Axiom of Choice
- embedding dimension and regular local ring
- Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras
- Left, right and two-sided ideals
- Locally finite type and finite type morphisms
- Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes
- Noetherian modules: every submodule is finitely generated
- Left and right Noetherian rings
- Regular points of locally Noetherian schemes
- regular noetherian ring
- Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations
- Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are Noetherian by finite generators
- Regular algebras over a perfect field are geometrically regular
- Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres
- The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is A_p
Used by
- Classical and scheme smoothness over a perfect field Corollary
- General hypersurfaces give smooth complete intersections Corollary
- Generic smoothness on the source Corollary
- A nondegenerate projective quadric Example
- Projective orbit constructions for G/B and G/Pₐlpha Lemma
- Bertini smoothness away from the base locus Theorem
- Generic smoothness over a dense target open Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
75 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Varieties Lemma 33.12.3 (tag 038V), affine chart criterion for geometric regularity (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Varieties Lemma 33.12.6 (tag 038X), geometric regularity and smoothness at a point (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Algebra Lemma 10.166.1 (tag 0381), finite purely inseparable field test (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Chapter 10 supplement, §f, item 10.64 (printed p. 18; PDF page 18) (standard reference, not scraped)