Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Purely inseparable field algebras separate regularity from smoothness

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field of characteristic p>0 and put kp={xp:x∈k}. Let a∈k satisfy a∉kp, and put

L=k[t]/(tp−a),α=t+(tp−a)∈L.

Then L is a field, the structural map k→L is injective, αp=a and L=k[α], so L is a field extension of k; the affine k-scheme X=Spec⁡L is of finite type over k and regular; for every field extension K/k and every β∈K with βp=a there is a K-algebra isomorphism

L⊗kK≅K[u]/(up),

where K[u]/(up) is a Noetherian local ring with unique prime (u), Krull dimension 0 and embedding dimension 1, and is not regular; and consequently X→Spec⁡k is not smooth, although X is regular. The failure is witnessed already by K=L and β=α. No reduction, radicalization or Frobenius twist is applied: the displayed isomorphism is of the actual tensor product, and the nilpotent class u is retained.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k of characteristic p>0, the set kp={xp:x∈k}, an element a∈k with a∉kp, the ring L=k[t]/(tp−a) with the class α of t, and the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

If a is not a pth power in a characteristic-p field, then xpn−a is irreducible for every n≥1: for a field F of characteristic p>0, an element c∈F that is not a pth power, and n≥1, the polynomial xpn−c is irreducible in F[x].

[F2]

For a nonconstant p in F[x], the ideal (p) is maximal and F[x]/(p) is a field exactly when p is irreducible: for a field F and a nonconstant f∈F[x], the quotient ring F[x]/(f) is a field exactly when f is irreducible.

[F3]

Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras: a commutative R-algebra A is of finite type over R when A=R[a1,…,an] for some finite list, equivalently when A is isomorphic to a quotient R[x1,…,xn]/a.

[F4]

Finite type is affine-local on source and target: a quasi-compact morphism locally of finite type is of finite type; equivalently, over each affine target open it may be tested on a finite affine source cover.

[F5]

Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity: under AC, for a finite-type k-scheme X, the morphism X→Spec⁡k is smooth if and only if for every field extension K/k every local ring of the scheme-theoretic base change XK is regular.

[F6]

Affine charts after extension of the ground field: for a field extension K/k and a k-scheme X, the inverse image under XK→X of every affine open U=Spec⁡A of X is Spec⁡(A⊗kK), and these affine charts cover XK.

[F7]

Presentations and localization under base extension: for a unital ring map A→C and an ideal I⊆A[ti], there is a ring isomorphism (A[ti]/I)⊗AC≅C[ti]/IC[ti]; no flatness, finite-generation or nonzero-ring hypothesis is required.

[F8]

Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings: Spec⁡ is a contravariant equivalence from commutative rings to affine schemes with quasi-inverse global sections, so a ring isomorphism induces an isomorphism of affine schemes.

[F9]

embedding dimension and regular local ring: for a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring (R,m,κ), edim⁡R=dim⁡κ(m/m2), and R is regular local exactly when edim⁡R=dim⁡R.

[F10]

An algebra that is finite dimensional as a vector space over a field is a Noetherian ring: a commutative algebra over a field whose underlying vector space is finite dimensional is a Noetherian ring.

[F12]

Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes: a scheme is locally Noetherian when it has an affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings.

[F13]

Regular points of locally Noetherian schemes: on a locally Noetherian scheme X, a point x is regular when the local ring OX,x is a regular local ring.

[F14]

The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is A_p: for a prime p∈Spec⁡A there is a canonical isomorphism OSpec⁡A,p≅Ap.

[F15]

Krull dimension of a nonzero ring: for a nonzero commutative ring, the Krull dimension is the supremum of the lengths of strict chains of prime ideals.

[F16]

The binomial theorem over an arbitrary commutative ring: (x+y)n=∑k=0n(nk)xkyn−k in every commutative ring, with natural-number coefficients acting by repeated addition.

[F17]

A prime p divides (pk) for 0<k<p: if p is prime and 0<k<p, then p divides (pk).

[F18]

Field: a field has 0≠1, and every nonzero element x has a multiplicative inverse x−1 with x x−1=1.

[F19]

Field homomorphism and embedding: a field homomorphism φ:F→G satisfies φ(xy)=φ(x)φ(y) and φ(1F)=1G, and an embedding is an injective field homomorphism.

[F20]

A field is perfect exactly when it has characteristic zero or its Frobenius map is surjective: a field F is perfect exactly when char⁡F=0, or char⁡F=p>0 and the Frobenius map a↦ap is surjective.

[F21]

The Axiom of Choice: AC asserts that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; it is declared here because [F5] carries that assumption, and no further simultaneous choice is used below.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2F3F18F19algebra

The class α of t satisfies αp=a, and L=k[α] is a quotient of k[t], hence of finite type over k by [F3]. The polynomial tp−a is nonconstant, and [F1] with F=k, c=a and n=1 makes it irreducible in k[t]; by [F2] the quotient L is therefore a field. The structural map φ:k→L is a field homomorphism by [F19] and 1L≠0L by [F18]; for x≠0 in k the inverse relation x x−1=1 of [F18] is preserved by [F19], giving φ(x)φ(x−1)=φ(1)=1≠0, so φ(x)≠0. Hence φ is injective and exhibits k as a subfield of L.

1.2F10algebra

For any field F, the quotient ring RF=F[u]/(up) has the classes of 1,u,…,up−1 as an F-basis, because division by the monic polynomial up leaves unique remainders of degree less than p. Hence RF is a commutative F-algebra of dimension p over F, and it is a Noetherian ring by [F10]. Since p≥2, the ring RF is nonzero and u≠0 in RF.

1.3F16F17algebra

Let K/k be a field extension and let β∈K satisfy βp=a. Then K has characteristic p, and [F16] with x=z, y=−β and n=p gives (z−β)p=∑k=0p(pk)zp−k(−β)k in the commutative ring K[z]; the intermediate coefficients (pk) with 0<k<p vanish by [F17], while (p0)=(pp)=1, so (z−β)p=zp+(−β)p=zp−βp=zp−a, where (−β)p=−βp holds in every characteristic.

2.1F4step 1.1

X=Spec⁡L is of finite type over k: over the affine base Spec⁡k the source is covered by the single affine chart Spec⁡L, and the ring map k→L is of finite type by step 1.1, so [F4] applies.

2.2F9F11F12F13F14F15step 1.1

X is locally Noetherian and regular. Since L is a field, [F11] makes L a Noetherian ring, and the one-chart cover {Spec⁡L} witnesses local Noetherianity by [F12]. The field L has the single prime ideal (0), so dim⁡L=0 by [F15]; its maximal ideal is (0), so m/m2=0 and edim⁡L=0=dim⁡L, which makes L a regular local ring by [F9]. The single point (0) of X has local ring OX,(0)≅L(0)=L by [F14], so it is regular by [F13]; being the only point, it makes X regular.

2.3F6F7step 1.1

For a field extension K/k, write XK for the base change of X along Spec⁡K→Spec⁡k. The inverse image of the affine open U=X under XK→X is Spec⁡(L⊗kK) by [F6], and it is all of XK; applying [F7] with A=k, the variable t, the ideal I=(tp−a)⊆k[t] and C=K gives a ring isomorphism L⊗kK≅K[z]/(zp−a).

2.4step 1.2algebra

For any field F, the ring RF=F[u]/(up) is local with unique prime (u). By the basis of step 1.2 every element of RF has a unique expression c0+c1u+⋯+cp−1up−1. If c0≠0, write the element as c0(1+uh); then (uh)p=uphp=0, so 1+uh has inverse 1−uh+(uh)2−⋯+(−uh)p−1 and the element is a unit. If c0=0, the element lies in (u) and is not a unit, because u≠0 is nilpotent and a nilpotent element of a nonzero commutative ring cannot be a unit. Hence (u) is the unique maximal ideal. Since up=0, every prime ideal contains u and hence contains (u); and (u) is prime because RF/(u)≅F is a field. So (u) is the only prime ideal.

3.1F8step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.3step 2.4algebra

Fix a field extension K/k and β∈K with βp=a. Combining steps 2.3 and 1.3 and substituting u=z−β gives K-algebra isomorphisms L⊗kK≅K[z]/(zp−a)=K[z]/((z−β)p)≅K[u]/(up)=RK, with RK as in steps 1.2 and 2.4; in particular, taking K=L and β=α, which is legitimate by step 1.1, the base change XL=Spec⁡(L⊗kL) is isomorphic to Spec⁡RL by [F8].

3.2F9F15step 1.2step 2.4algebra

For any field F, the ring RF is not a regular local ring. It is nonzero, Noetherian by step 1.2, and local with maximal ideal (u) by step 2.4. As (u) is the only prime ideal, [F15] gives dim⁡RF=0. Every element of (u) is congruent modulo (u)2 to cu for some c∈F by the basis of step 1.2, and u∉(u)2 because u has basis coefficient 1 in degree 1 while every element of (u)2 has basis coefficients only in degrees at least 2; hence (u)/(u)2 is one-dimensional over F with basis the class of u, and edim⁡RF=1. Thus edim⁡RF=1≠0=dim⁡RF, and [F9] shows that RF is not regular local.

4.1F14step 2.4step 3.1step 3.2

The scheme XL has a nonregular local ring. By step 3.1, XL≅Spec⁡RL, and by step 2.4 the ring RL is local with unique maximal ideal (u), so Spec⁡RL consists of the single point (u). Its local ring is OSpec⁡RL,(u)≅(RL)(u)=RL by [F14], the last equality because every element outside (u) is a unit by step 2.4. Step 3.2 says that RL is not a regular local ring, so this local ring of XL is not regular.

5.1F5F21step 2.1step 2.2step 4.1given

X is not smooth over k. By [F5], the AC-carrying geometric-regularity characterization, X→Spec⁡k is smooth only if every local ring of every base change XK, with K/k a field, is regular. The field extension K=L of step 1.1 and the nonregular local ring of XL exhibited in step 4.1 contradict that condition, so X→Spec⁡k is not smooth. Meanwhile X is of finite type over k by step 2.1 and regular by step 2.2, so an imperfect base field separates regularity from smoothness.

6.1F5F9F20F21givenstep 1.1step 1.2step 2.2step 2.3step 2.4step 3.1step 3.2step 5.1algebra∎

Boundary and hypothesis checks. (i) The hypothesis a∉kp is exactly what step 1.1 needs, and by [F20] the existence of some such a is equivalent to imperfection of k in characteristic p; a perfect field of characteristic p has no such a, so the conclusion of step 5.1 cannot arise there. (ii) If instead a=bp lies in kp, then tp−a=(t−b)p and L≅k[u]/(up) is the nonreduced ring of steps 1.2 and 3.2, which is not even regular; so the hypothesis is used, not decorative. (iii) The nilpotent class u survives: steps 2.3 and 3.1 are isomorphisms of the actual tensor product, and no reduction or radical is taken, so the nonreduced base change is retained. (iv) The extension is genuinely needed: for K=k the base change is X itself, which is regular by step 2.2, and the witness K=L is the field generated over k by one pth root of a. (v) At p=2 the ring RF=F[u]/(u2) is the classical dual-number ring of dimension 0 and embedding dimension 1; steps 1.2 through 3.2 divide by nothing except the monic polynomial up, so characteristic 2 is included. (vi) AC is declared in [F21] and used only through [F5]; the proof exhibits the single extension K=L and one point, so it makes no simultaneous choice and invokes no dependent choice.

Source qualification

Stacks Project Example 33.12.7 (tag 038S) takes k=Fp(t) and observes that Spec⁡(k[x]/(xp−t)) is a regular variety over k that is not geometrically reduced, the base change to k(t1/p) becoming k(t1/p)[ϵ]/(ϵp). That example is the case a=t∉kp of the statement above. The example is used here as the literature source for the phenomenon only: the field, regularity, base-change and non-smoothness assertions are each proved from the library's own suppliers in steps 1.1--5.1, and the general statement over an arbitrary field k of characteristic p with an arbitrary a∉kp is not asserted by that example. The equivalence between smoothness over a field and geometric regularity invoked in step 5.1 is the one proved in Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity, not an external citation. The dual-number case p=2 is the published example of dual numbers not regular, which records the same dimension-zero, embedding-dimension-one computation for u2=0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

93 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources