Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A regular point that is not smooth: a purely inseparable thickening

Statement refuted

False claim: every regular scheme of finite type over a field is smooth over that field. Let p be a prime, let k=Fp(s) be the rational function field over the field Fp=Z/p of p elements, and put L=k[t]/(tp−s) with α=t+(tp−s)∈L. Then s∉kp, the ring L is a field with αp=s and L=k[α], and the extension k⊆L is purely inseparable. The affine k-scheme X=Spec⁡L is of finite type over k and regular, yet it is not smooth over k; base change along the purely inseparable extension Spec⁡L→Spec⁡k satisfies L⊗kL≅L[u]/(up), a Noetherian local ring with unique prime (u), Krull dimension 0, embedding dimension 1 and not regular, so after adjoining the pth root α of s the regular point has become a nonregular point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A prime p, the field k=Fp(s) of rational functions in one variable over Fp=Z/p, the ring L=k[t]/(tp−s) with the class α of t, and the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

For a field F, F(t)=Frac⁡(F[t]) is its rational function field; in particular R(t)=Frac⁡(R[t]) and The characteristic of a ring: the least n≥1 with n⋅1R=0 when one exists, and 0 otherwise: for every field F the rational function field F(s)=Frac⁡(F[s]) is a field whose elements are the fractions f/g with f,g∈F[s] and g≠0, and it contains an embedded copy of F; the characteristic of a ring R is the least n≥1 with n⋅1R=0R, and is 0 when no such n exists.

[F2]

For every field F, F[x] is a unique factorisation domain: for every field F, the polynomial ring F[s] is a unique factorisation domain.

[F3]

R/M is a field if and only if M is a maximal ideal: for a commutative ring R and an ideal M⊆R, the quotient R/M is a field if and only if M is a maximal ideal.

[F4]

Purely inseparable field algebras separate regularity from smoothness: under AC, let F be a field of characteristic p>0, let a∈F∖Fp, and put L′=F[t]/(tp−a) with the class α′ of t. Then L′ is a field, F→L′ is injective, (α′)p=a and L′=F[α′]; the affine F-scheme X′=Spec⁡L′ is of finite type over F and regular; for every field extension K/F and every β∈K with βp=a there is a K-algebra isomorphism L′⊗FK≅K[u]/(up), where the target is a Noetherian local ring with unique prime (u), Krull dimension 0 and embedding dimension 1, and is not regular; consequently X′→Spec⁡F is not smooth although X′ is regular, the failure being witnessed already by K=L′ and β=α′.

[F5]

Purely inseparable algebraic extensions: an algebraic extension K/F with char⁡F=p>0 is purely inseparable when for every α∈K there is n≥0 with αpn∈F.

[F6]

Algebraic and transcendental elements and algebraic extensions: an element a of an extension K/F is algebraic over F when f(a)=0 for some nonzero polynomial f∈F[x], and the extension is algebraic when every element is algebraic.

[F7]

Frobenius x↦xp is an injective endomorphism in characteristic p, and an automorphism for finite fields: for a field F of characteristic p>0 the Frobenius map x↦xp is an injective field endomorphism, so (x+y)p=xp+yp and (xy)p=xpyp; its n-fold iterate is x↦xpn.

[F8]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function.

[F9]

The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is A_p: for a prime p∈Spec⁡A there is a canonical isomorphism OSpec⁡A,p≅Ap.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

The field and its characteristic. By [F1] the field k=Fp(s)=Frac⁡(Fp[s]) consists of the fractions f/g with f,g∈Fp[s], g≠0, and contains an embedded copy of Fp=Z/p. In Fp one has p⋅1=0 while n⋅1≠0 for every integer n with 0<n<p, since such an n is not a multiple of p; a ring embedding preserves natural multiples of the identity, so in k also p⋅1k=0 and n⋅1k≠0 for 0<n<p. By the definition of characteristic in [F1] this is exactly char⁡k=p, so k is a field of characteristic p>0.

1.2F1F2F3algebra

The element s is not a pth power. Suppose s=(f/g)p with f,g∈Fp[s] and g≠0; then sgp=fp in the polynomial ring Fp[s], which is a UFD by [F2]. Evaluation at 0 is a surjective ring homomorphism Fp[s]→Fp with kernel (s), so Fp[s]/(s)≅Fp is a field and (s) is a maximal, hence prime, ideal by [F3]; therefore s is a prime element, and the s-adic order ord⁡s on nonzero polynomials, which records the largest power of s dividing an element, is additive over products. Comparing orders in sgp=fp gives 1+pord⁡s(g)=pord⁡s(f), which is impossible because p≥2 does not divide 1. Hence no element of k has pth power s, that is, s∉kp.

2.1F4F8step 1.1step 1.2given

The general theorem applies to this pair. The field k has characteristic p>0 by step 1.1, and s∉kp by step 1.2, so [F4] applies with F=k and a=s: the ring L=k[t]/(tp−s) is a field, the structural map k→L is injective, αp=s and L=k[α]; the affine k-scheme X=Spec⁡L is of finite type over k and regular; for every field extension K/k and every β∈K with βp=s there is a K-algebra isomorphism L⊗kK≅K[u]/(up), where K[u]/(up) is a Noetherian local ring with unique prime (u), Krull dimension 0 and embedding dimension 1, and is not regular; and consequently X→Spec⁡k is not smooth, although X is regular. The Axiom of Choice is used only here, through [F4], as declared in [F8].

3.1F4F9step 2.1givenalgebra

Adjoining the pth root: the base change at K=L. By step 2.1 the element α∈L satisfies αp=s, so the witness clause of [F4] applies with K=L and β=α and gives the L-algebra isomorphism L⊗kL≅L[u]/(up); this is the coordinate ring of the base change XL of X along Spec⁡L→Spec⁡k. The ring L[u]/(up) is a Noetherian local ring with unique prime and maximal ideal (u), Krull dimension 0, embedding dimension 1, and it is not regular; every element outside (u) is a unit, so its localisation at (u) is the ring itself, and by [F9] that localisation is the local ring of the unique point of XL. Hence that point is nonregular, although its image under XL→X is the regular point of X.

3.2F5F6F7step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The extension is purely inseparable. Every element of L=k[α] is a k-linear combination z=∑i=0p−1ciαi with ci∈k: each power αm with m≥p is reduced by αm=αm−pαp=s αm−p. By [F7] the pth power map of the field L is additive and multiplicative, so zp=∑i=0p−1ci pαip=∑i=0p−1ci ps i∈k, because αip=(αp)i=si for i≥1, and ci p∈k and si∈k for every i. Hence every z∈L is a root of the nonzero polynomial xp−zp over k, so every element of L is algebraic over k by [F6] and L/k is an algebraic extension; with char⁡k=p>0 from step 1.1 and zp∈k for every z, the definition [F5] shows that k⊆L is purely inseparable.

4.1F1F4F7F8step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1givenalgebra∎

Boundaries and conclusion. The argument includes p=2, where L[u]/(u2) is the dual-numbers ring over L, local with Krull dimension 0 and embedding dimension 1 and not regular. The hypothesis s∉kp is genuinely used: it holds in Fp(s) by step 1.2, but over K=L the same element satisfies s=αp, and correspondingly tp−s=(t−α)p over K, so the base change acquires the class u=t−α with up=0; this is why the regularity detected in k is not stable. No reduction or Frobenius twist is applied: the isomorphism of step 3.1 is an isomorphism of the actual tensor product L⊗kL and retains the class u. The scheme X is nonempty, since L is a field with 1≠0, and has a single point of residue field L; the empty-scheme case is therefore absent, while X has Krull dimension zero and embedding dimension zero because its local ring is the field L. Its base change in step 3.1 still has dimension zero but has embedding dimension one, and the finite-type hypothesis of [F4] is met by construction. Perfectness of k fails: s∉kp exhibits the Frobenius x↦xp of k as nonsurjective by [F7]. Choice is declared in [F8] and is used only through [F4]; the example exhibits one field, one element and one base change, so no simultaneous selection occurs.

Source qualification

Stacks Project Example 33.12.7 (tag 038S), first example, takes k=Fp(t) and observes that Spec⁡(k[x]/(xp−t)) is a regular variety over k that is not geometrically reduced. The item above instantiates the pair's own general result Purely inseparable field algebras separate regularity from smoothness at F=Fp(s) and a=s, and its only independent obligation is the hypothesis s∉Fp(s)p, proved in step 1.2 from reduced fractions in the UFD Fp[s]; the corresponding claim for t over Fp(t) is the one recorded by the Stacks example. All smoothness, regularity, base-change and dimension assertions are taken from the statement of Purely inseparable field algebras separate regularity from smoothness, which is proved in this library from its own suppliers; the purely inseparable clause is derived here from the definition Purely inseparable algebraic extensions. The dual-number case p=2 is the published computation of dual numbers not regular, which is not used as a supplier because its statement provenance is ai-generated.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources