How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The binomial theorem over an arbitrary commutative ring
Statement
Let be a commutative ring. For all and ,
The natural-number coefficients act by repeated addition. The formula includes .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , elements , and a natural number .
Multiplication in a commutative ring is commutative and distributes over addition (Commutative ring).
The binomial coefficient counts the -element subsets of an -element set, with (The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient ).
Natural powers satisfy and (Powers : natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with ).
Pascal's identity is (Pascal's rule , and the hockey-stick identity ).
Proof
For , both sides are : the left by [L3], and the right is the sole term .
Assume the formula holds for .
Multiply the inductive formula by , distribute using [L1], and reindex to obtain the coefficient on for each interior .
By [L4] these interior coefficients are , and [L2] supplies the two endpoint coefficients . Thus the formula holds for .
Induction proves the identity for every natural .
Depends on
- Commutative ring
- The set $[A]^{k}$ of $k$-element subsets and the binomial coefficient $\binom{n}{k} := \lvert [n]^{k}\rvert$
- Powers $g^{n}$: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with $g^{0} = e$
- Pascal's rule $\binom{n+1}{k+1} = \binom{n}{k} + \binom{n}{k+1}$, and the hockey-stick identity $\sum_{i \le n}\binom{i}{k} = \binom{n+1}{k+1}$
Used by
- A purely inseparable field has nonzero Omega Counterexample
- Frobenius linear systems have nonreduced general members Counterexample
- Regular field factors can have a nonregular tensor product Counterexample
- A finite separable extension and an inseparable extension with differentials Example
- Base change of an inseparable field extension is a thickening Example
- Different singularities can share a tangent cone Example
- The cusp retains a doubled tangent line Example
- Finite-type field extensions with zero Ω Lemma
- Separable generation after finite purely inseparable extensions Lemma
- The radical of an ideal is an ideal Lemma
- In characteristic p the only pᵏ-th root of unity is 1, and t^pᵏ-1=(t-1)^pᵏ Proposition
- Finitely generated extensions of a perfect field are separably generated Theorem
- Frobenius x↦ xᵖ is an injective endomorphism in characteristic p, and an automorphism for finite fields Theorem
- Purely inseparable field algebras separate regularity from smoothness Theorem
- Regular algebras over a perfect field are geometrically regular Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. W. Knapp, Basic Algebra, 2nd ed., Chapter IX, Section 3 (standard reference, not scraped)