Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Separable generation after finite purely inseparable extensions

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let K/k be a finitely generated field extension (Finitely generated field extensions F(a1,…,ar)) whose characteristic is p>0. There are finite purely inseparable extensions k′/k and K′/K fitting into a commutative square of field embeddings k⟶K↓↓k′⟶K′ such that K′/k′ is separably generated (Separating transcendence basis and separably generated extensions for the separability terminology). No perfectness of k is assumed.

In characteristic 0 the same conclusion holds with k′=k and K′=K, since a finitely generated extension of a perfect field is separably generated; the statement above is the positive-characteristic case, where K′/K and k′/k may both be nontrivial.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finitely generated field extension K/k of characteristic p>0 and the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

Separating transcendence basis and separably generated extensions: for a finitely generated extension K/k, a finite tuple t1,…,tr is a separating transcendence basis when it is a transcendence basis and K/k(t1,…,tr) is finite separable; K/k is separably generated when it admits such a tuple.

[F2]

Algebraic and transcendental elements and algebraic extensions: an element is algebraic over a subfield when it satisfies a nonzero polynomial over it, transcendental otherwise, and a set is algebraically independent when it satisfies no nonzero polynomial relation.

[F3]

A maximal algebraically independent set is a transcendence basis: an algebraically independent subset maximal for inclusion is a transcendence basis.

[F4]

An extension generated by finitely many algebraic elements is finite: a finitely generated algebraic field extension is finite.

[F5]

Separable algebraic elements and separable extensions: α is separable over F when it is algebraic with separable minimal polynomial, and K/F is separable when every element of K is separable over F.

[F6]

The separable closure of the base inside an algebraic extension: for algebraic K/F, the separable closure Ks={a∈K:a separable over F} is the largest intermediate field separable over F.

[F8]

Pure inseparability and its conjugate, embedding, and separable-degree criteria: for algebraic K/F of characteristic p, K/F is purely inseparable if and only if every α∈K has αpe∈F for some e≥0; a finite extension is purely inseparable exactly when [K:F]s=1.

[F9]

[K:F]=[K:F]s[K:F]i, and in positive characteristic the inseparable degree is a power of p: [K:F]=[K:F]s[K:F]i for finite K/F, and [K:F]i is a power of p in characteristic p.

[F10]

For a finite extension, [K:F]s=[Ks:F]: [K:F]s=[Ks:F] for finite K/F.

[F11]

If a is not a pth power in a characteristic-p field, then xpn−a is irreducible for every n≥1: if F has characteristic p>0 and a∈F is not a p-th power, then xpn−a is irreducible in F[x] for every n≥1.

[F12]

Repeated roots in extension fields and separable polynomials: a polynomial is separable over F when it has no repeated root in any extension field.

[F13]

A nonzero polynomial over a field is separable exactly when its gcd with its derivative is 1: 0≠f∈F[x] is separable if and only if gcd⁡(f,f′)=1.

[F14]

The evaluation kernel and the unique monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element: f(a)=0 if and only if the minimal polynomial ma of a over F divides f.

[F15]

The binomial theorem over an arbitrary commutative ring: (u+v)m=∑k(mk)ukvm−k in every commutative ring.

[F16]

A prime p divides (pk) for 0<k<p: p∣(pk) for 0<k<p, so in characteristic p the binomial theorem gives (u+v)p=up+vp and, more generally, (∑iui)p=∑iuip.

[F17]

Pure inseparability is transitive in towers and stable under composita: purely inseparable extensions compose, and the compositum of purely inseparable subextensions of a common algebraic extension is purely inseparable over the base.

[F18]

Tower law for finite extensions: [L:F]=[L:K][K:F]: for F⊆K⊆L with K/F and L/K finite, [L:F]=[L:K][K:F].

[F20]

Finitely generated extensions of a perfect field are separably generated: every finitely generated extension of a perfect field is separably generated.

[F21]

Finitely generated field extensions F(a1,…,ar): K/k is finitely generated when K=k(α1,…,αn) for finitely many elements.

Proof

1.1

Reduction and set-up. If the characteristic is 0, then k is perfect by [F19], so [F20] makes K/k separably generated and k′=k, K′=K are finite purely inseparable over their bases by [F8] (in characteristic 0 the only purely inseparable extension is the trivial one). Assume from now on that the characteristic is p>0. Fix a finite generating set α1,…,αn of K over k by [F21] and choose a maximal algebraically independent subset {x1,…,xr} of it, which is a transcendence basis of K/k by [F3, F2]. Put F0:=k(x1,…,xr); every αi is algebraic over F0 by maximality, so K/F0 is finitely generated algebraic, hence finite by [F4]. Let Ks be the separable closure of F0 in K; then Ks/F0 is finite separable by [F6, F4] and K/Ks is purely inseparable by [F7], finite by [F18], so that d:=log⁡p[K:Ks] is a nonnegative integer by [F9, F8].

F2F3F4F6F7F8F9F18F19F20F21F10
1.2

An element of K with a p-th root of the right shape. Assume d≥1, so K≠Ks. By [F8] and [F7] applied to an element of K∖Ks there is β0∈K and a minimal e≥1 with β0pe∈Ks; then β:=β0pe−1 satisfies β∉Ks by minimality of e and α:=βp∈Ks. Since α∈Ks is separable over F0 by [F5, F6], its minimal polynomial P∈F0[T] over F0 is separable by [F12, F5], hence gcd⁡(P,P′)=1 by [F13] and P has pairwise distinct roots; write P=∑iaiTi with ai∈F0=k(x1,…,xr).

F5F6F7F8F12F13
1.3

A finite purely inseparable base change making the coefficients p-th powers. Write each ai=fi/gi with fi,gi∈k[x1,…,xr] and gi≠0, and let C⊆k be the finite set of all coefficients occurring in the finitely many polynomials fi,gi. Choose an algebraic closure Ω of K and inside it put k′:=k(c1/p:c∈C), so that k′/k is finite purely inseparable by [F17, F8]; put F:=k′(x11/p,…,xr1/p)⊆Ω, the compositum of k′ and F0. Each monomial xm with m∈Nr is a p-th power in F: writing m=pm′+m′′ with m′′∈{0,…,p−1}r one has xm=(xm′(x1/p)m′′)p. Each c∈C equals (c1/p)p, so every fi and gi is a finite sum of p-th powers, hence a p-th power by [F16], and therefore each ai=fi/gi is a p-th power in F. Write ai=cip with ci∈F and put R:=∑iciTi∈F[T].

F8F16F17
1.4

The p-th root of α is separable. By [F15] and [F16], P(Tp)=∑iaiTpi=∑icipTpi=(∑iciTi)p=R(T)p in F[T]. Let α1,…,αn∈Ω be the distinct roots of P (so n=deg⁡P=deg⁡R, and n≥1), and for each j choose γj∈Ω with γjp=αj, which exists because Ω is algebraically closed. Then R(γj)p=P(γjp)=P(αj)=0, so R(γj)=0, and the γj are distinct because γjp=αj are. Hence R has deg⁡R distinct roots in Ω, so R is separable over F by [F12] and [F13] applied to its distinct-root factorisation. Since α=βp is a root of P, the element β satisfies R(β)p=P(βp)=P(α)=0, hence R(β)=0; and β∈L:=K⋅F⊆Ω, a compositum which is finitely generated over k′. As R is separable with the root β, the minimal polynomial of β over F divides R by [F14] and is separable, so β is separable over F by [F5] and lies in the separable closure Ls of F in L by [F6].

F5F6F12F13F14F15F16
2.1

The case d=0. If d=0 then [K:Ks]=1, so K=Ks and K/F0 is finite separable by [F6]; then x1,…,xr is a separating transcendence basis of K/k by [F1], and with k′=k, K′=K the conclusion holds trivially.

F1F6step 1.1
2.2

The separable closure of F in L and the degree drop. L/K is finite purely inseparable and F/F0 is purely inseparable. First, KsF/F is separable: Ks/F0 is finite separable by step 1.1, and a compositum of a separable algebraic extension with a further extension is separable because the minimal polynomial over the larger field divides the separable minimal polynomial over the smaller one by [F14]. Second, L/KsF is purely inseparable by [F17]. Hence Ls=KsF: one inclusion holds because KsF/F is separable and Ls is the largest separable intermediate field by [F6], and for the other, an element γ∈Ls is separable over F and has γpe∈KsF for some e≥0 by [F8], so it is simultaneously separable and purely inseparable over KsF and therefore already lies in KsF. Since β∈Ls and β∉Ks, the field Ks(β) satisfies [Ks(β):Ks]=p: the polynomial Tp−α∈Ks[T] vanishes at β while α is not a p-th power in Ks (a relation α=γp would give (β/γ)p=1, hence β=γ by [F16]), so Tp−α is irreducible by [F11] and is the minimal polynomial of β over Ks by [F14]. Put E:=K∩Ls, an intermediate field of K/Ks containing Ks(β), and choose θ1,…,θm∈K with K=E(θ1,…,θm), possible since K/E is finite by [F18]. Then L=Ls⋅K equals Ls(θ1,…,θm), and for each i the minimal polynomial of θi over Ls(θ1,…,θi−1) divides its minimal polynomial over E(θ1,…,θi−1) by [F14], so those two extensions satisfy the degree inequality [Ls(θ1,…,θi):Ls(θ1,…,θi−1)]≤[E(θ1,…,θi):E(θ1,…,θi−1)]; multiplying over i and applying [F18] twice yields [L:Ls]≤[K:E]≤[K:Ks(β)]=[K:Ks]/p, the last equality being [F18] for the tower Ks⊆Ks(β)⊆K.

F6F8F11F14F16F17F18step 1.4
3.1

Induction. The extension L/k′ is finitely generated by [F21] and has characteristic p, and by step 2.2 its invariant log⁡p[L:Ls] is strictly smaller than d=log⁡p[K:Ks]. Applying the induction hypothesis (on the nonnegative integer d, with the same statement for the pair L/k′) produces finite purely inseparable extensions k′′/k′ and L′/L with L′/k′′ separably generated. Then k′′/k is finite purely inseparable by [F17, F9] and L′/K is finite purely inseparable by [F17] since L/K is, so k′′ and L′ satisfy the conclusion for K/k. The base case d=0 of the induction is step 2.1, so the assertion holds for every d≥0.

F8F9F17F21step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

Conclusion. In characteristic p>0 steps 1.2–1.4, 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 produce the required finite purely inseparable k′/k and K′/K with K′/k′ separably generated, the induction being on the integer d=log⁡p[K:Ks] of step 1.1; the characteristic 0 case is step 1.1. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

69 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources