How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
, and in positive characteristic the inseparable degree is a power of
Statement
For every finite extension ,
If , then is a power of . In characteristic zero it is one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite extension with relative separable closure .
Inseparable degree is the quotient (The inseparable degree of a finite extension).
One has (For a finite extension, ).
The extension is purely inseparable (An algebraic extension is purely inseparable over its separable closure).
A finite purely inseparable extension in characteristic has -power degree (A finite purely inseparable extension in characteristic has degree a power of ).
Ordinary degrees multiply in finite towers (Tower law for finite extensions: ).
Proof
The displayed factorization is the defining equality in [L1] after multiplying by .
By [L5] and [L2], , so comparison with step 1.1 gives .
In characteristic , [L3] and [L4] make this last degree a power of . In characteristic zero, , so it is one.
Depends on
- The inseparable degree $[K:F]_i=[K:F]/[K:F]_s$ of a finite extension
- For a finite extension, $[K:F]_s=[K_s:F]$
- An algebraic extension is purely inseparable over its separable closure
- A finite purely inseparable extension in characteristic $p$ has degree a power of $p$
- Tower law for finite extensions: $[L:F]=[L:K][K:F]$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 41 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. L. Clark, Field Theory, Chapters 4 and 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, Chapters 3 and 5 (standard reference, not scraped)