How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A field's prime subfield is isomorphic to in characteristic zero and to in characteristic
Statement
Let be the prime subfield of a field .
- If , then is isomorphic to .
- If , then is isomorphic to .
Each isomorphism sends to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and its prime subfield .
The prime subfield is the intersection of all subfields of and hence the smallest one (The prime subfield as the intersection of all subfields).
The characteristic of is zero or prime (The characteristic of a field is zero or a prime number).
For prime , the quotient is a field (For every prime , the two operations on make it a field).
The rational numbers form a field (The rationals form a field).
A field homomorphism preserves addition, multiplication and (Field homomorphism and embedding); it is therefore injective, its kernel being an ideal of a field that does not contain .
Proof
Suppose . The map given by is well defined, is a field homomorphism, and is injective; its image is a subfield contained in every subfield of .
Suppose . The map , , is injective. Sending a rational class with to is well defined and gives an injective field homomorphism .
By [L1], that image equals , proving the first classification.
Its image is a subfield and every subfield of contains all integer multiples of and their nonzero quotients. Hence the image is contained in every subfield and equals by [L1].
Steps 2.1 and 2.2 exhaust the alternatives in [L2].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 73 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. W. Knapp, Basic Algebra, 2nd ed., Chapter IX, Section 3 (standard reference, not scraped)