Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular field factors can have a nonregular tensor product

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), used below for the regular-local-domain theorem.

False claim: if R and S are regular Noetherian k-algebras, then so is R⊗kS. Let k be a field of characteristic p>0 and let L/k be a nontrivial finite purely inseparable extension (Purely inseparable algebraic extensions). Then L is a regular Noetherian ring (it is a field), while L⊗kL has a nonzero nilpotent and is therefore not reduced and not regular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k of characteristic p>0, a finite purely inseparable extension L/k with L≠k, and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Purely inseparable algebraic extensions: a finite extension L/k in characteristic p>0 is purely inseparable when for every α∈L there is n∈N with αpn∈k; the exponent n=0 is allowed, so elements of k are covered.

[F2]

The binomial theorem over an arbitrary commutative ring, A prime p divides (pk) for 0<k<p: in characteristic p the binomial coefficients (pi), 0<i<p, are divisible by p, so (X+Y)p=Xp+Yp in every commutative ring of characteristic p, and iterating gives the same identity for the exponent pn.

[F3]

regular noetherian ring, embedding dimension and regular local ring: a commutative Noetherian ring is regular when each of its prime localisations is a regular local ring; a nonzero Noetherian local ring (R,m,κ) satisfies edim⁡R=dim⁡κ(m/m2) and is regular exactly when edim⁡R=dim⁡R.

[F4]

regular local domain induction: under the Axiom of Choice, every regular local ring is an integral domain.

[F5]

Universal mapping property of the tensor product of commutative algebras: L⊗kL is generated as a ring by the two copies of L, with b⊗c↦bc defining the multiplication, so that a⊗1=1⊗a for a∈k.

Counterexample

1.1

The element α and the nilpotent u. Since L≠k, choose α∈L∖k; by [F1] there is n≥1 with a:=αpn∈k, and we fix such an n (the minimal one). Put u:=α⊗1−1⊗α∈L⊗kL.

F1givenchoose
2.1

u≠0. Since L is finite-dimensional over k and α∉k, the elements 1,α are k-linearly independent, so the linear functional on the plane k⋅1+k⋅α with λ(1)=1, λ(α)=0 extends to a k-linear map λ ⁣:L→k (finite-dimensional linear algebra). If u=0, then applying λ⊗id⁡ to the identity α⊗1=1⊗α gives λ(α)⋅1=λ(1)⋅α, that is 0=α, a contradiction; hence u≠0.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

u is nilpotent. By [F2], in the commutative ring L⊗kL of characteristic p one has upn=(α⊗1)pn−(1⊗α)pn=αpn⊗1−1⊗αpn, and this is a⊗1−1⊗a=0 because a∈k satisfies a⊗1=1⊗a by [F5]. So u≠0 is a nilpotent element and L⊗kL is not reduced.

F2F5step 1.1step 2.1algebra
4.1

L is regular and L⊗kL is not. The field L is Noetherian and its only prime is (0), whose localisation is the field L itself: a field is a regular local ring of dimension 0 with zero maximal ideal, so edim⁡=dim⁡=0 by [F3], and L is regular. Suppose L⊗kL were regular. It is a nonzero finite-dimensional k-algebra, so some maximal ideal m contains the annihilator of u and then u has nonzero image in the localisation at m; that localisation would be a regular local ring, hence a domain by [F4], in which the nilpotent image of u must vanish, a contradiction. Therefore L⊗kL is not regular, so regularity of the two field factors L and L does not pass to their tensor product over k.

F3F4step 3.1algebra∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources