Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Base change of an inseparable field extension is a thickening

Example

Let k be a field of characteristic p>0 and let a∈k∖kp. Put L=k[t]/(tp−a) and let α∈L be the class of t, so that αp=a. Then L is a field and L⊗kL≅L[u]/(up),u=t⊗1−1⊗α, so that the base change of L along k→L is a nonreduced local ring: u≠0 and up=0. In particular Spec⁡(L⊗kL), the pullback of Spec⁡L→Spec⁡k along itself, is a nonreduced thickening of a point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k of characteristic p>0, an element a∈k∖kp, the polynomial Tp−a∈k[T], the ring L=k[T]/(Tp−a) with class α of T, and the k-algebra L⊗kL.

[F2]

The binomial theorem over an arbitrary commutative ring, A prime p divides (pk) for 0<k<p: in characteristic p the coefficients (pi), 0<i<p, are divisible by p, so (X+Y)p=Xp+Yp in every commutative ring of characteristic p; applied in L[T] this gives Tp−a=(T−α)p.

[F3]

Universal mapping property of the tensor product of commutative algebras, Tensoring is right exact: k[T]⊗kL≅L[T] via F⊗b↦bF, and tensoring the exact sequence 0→(Tp−a)→k[T]→L→0 with L over k gives L⊗kL≅L[T]/(Tp−a); more generally (B/I)⊗BC≅C/IC.

Verification

1.1

The ring L is a field. Choose a monic irreducible factor Q of Tp−a by [F1] and let ξ be the class of T in the field F=k[T]/(Q). Then ξp=a, and [F2] gives Tp−a=(T−ξ)p in F[T]. Thus Q has only one distinct root in a splitting field. If deg⁡Q=1, then ξ∈k contradicts a∉kp. If Q′≠0, irreducibility and [F1] would make Q separable with deg⁡Q≥2 distinct roots, also impossible. Thus Q′=0, so all exponents of Q are divisible by p. Since 1≤deg⁡Q≤p and Q is monic, it has degree p; as a monic divisor of Tp−a of that degree it equals Tp−a. Hence L is a field by [F1].

F1F2algebra
2.1

The tensor product. By [F3] there is an isomorphism L⊗kL≅L[T]/(Tp−a), the second factor acting on coefficients; by [F2] one has Tp−a=(T−α)p in L[T], so substituting u=T−α, an automorphism of L[T], gives L⊗kL≅L[u]/(up), under which u corresponds to T⊗1−1⊗α.

F2F3step 1.1algebra
3.1

The element u is a nonzero nilpotent. In L[u]/(up) the classes of 1,u,…,up−1 are an L-basis, because up is monic of degree p and division with remainder is available: hence u≠0 while up=0. Consequently L⊗kL is not reduced, so the base change of the field L along k→L is a nonreduced local ring with residue field L, and the fibre is a thickening rather than a reduced point.

step 2.1algebra∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources