How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Base change of an inseparable field extension is a thickening
Example
Let be a field of characteristic and let . Put and let be the class of , so that . Then is a field and so that the base change of along is a nonreduced local ring: and . In particular , the pullback of along itself, is a nonreduced thickening of a point.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field of characteristic , an element , the polynomial , the ring with class of , and the -algebra .
Every nonzero nonunit polynomial over a field factors into irreducible polynomials, For a nonconstant in , the ideal is maximal and is a field exactly when is irreducible, A nonzero polynomial over a field is separable exactly when its gcd with its derivative is : every nonconstant polynomial over a field has an irreducible factor , its quotient by is a field, and an irreducible polynomial with nonzero derivative is separable.
The binomial theorem over an arbitrary commutative ring, A prime divides for : in characteristic the coefficients , , are divisible by , so in every commutative ring of characteristic ; applied in this gives .
Universal mapping property of the tensor product of commutative algebras, Tensoring is right exact: via , and tensoring the exact sequence with over gives ; more generally .
Verification
The ring is a field. Choose a monic irreducible factor of by [F1] and let be the class of in the field . Then , and [F2] gives in . Thus has only one distinct root in a splitting field. If , then contradicts . If , irreducibility and [F1] would make separable with distinct roots, also impossible. Thus , so all exponents of are divisible by . Since and is monic, it has degree ; as a monic divisor of of that degree it equals . Hence is a field by [F1].
The tensor product. By [F3] there is an isomorphism , the second factor acting on coefficients; by [F2] one has in , so substituting , an automorphism of , gives under which corresponds to .
The element is a nonzero nilpotent. In the classes of are an -basis, because is monic of degree and division with remainder is available: hence while . Consequently is not reduced, so the base change of the field along is a nonreduced local ring with residue field , and the fibre is a thickening rather than a reduced point.
Depends on
- Universal mapping property of the tensor product of commutative algebras
- For a nonconstant $p$ in $F[x]$, the ideal $(p)$ is maximal and $F[x]/(p)$ is a field exactly when $p$ is irreducible
- A nonzero polynomial over a field is separable exactly when its gcd with its derivative is $1$
- Every nonzero nonunit polynomial over a field factors into irreducible polynomials
- Tensoring is right exact
- The binomial theorem over an arbitrary commutative ring
- A prime $p$ divides $\binom pk$ for $0<k<p$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Algebra 10.166.1–2 (tags 0381, 0382) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vakil §22.2.10 and §26.2.4, pp.578, 690–693 (standard reference, not scraped)