How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A purely inseparable field has nonzero Omega
Statement refuted
“If is a finite algebraic field extension, then .”
Counterexample
Let be a field of characteristic and let be an element that is not a -th power, . Set and let be the class of , so that and . Then is irreducible over , so is a field, finite of degree over , and purely inseparable over ; nevertheless with basis over . The vanishing derivative of is exactly what removes the relation in the Jacobian presentation of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field of characteristic , an element , the polynomial , the quotient , and the class of in .
For every field , is a principal ideal domain: over a field the ring is a principal ideal domain, so every element factors into irreducibles and every irreducible is prime.
For a nonconstant in , the ideal is maximal and is a field exactly when is irreducible: for a nonconstant , the quotient is a field if and only if is irreducible.
The binomial theorem over an arbitrary commutative ring: in a commutative ring, .
A prime divides for : for .
Division algorithm for polynomials over a field: for a field , every and every nonzero divisor admit with or ; in particular division by the monic polynomial evaluates: .
Jacobian presentation of Ω: for and one has ; in particular for , for the single relation.
Pure inseparability and its conjugate, embedding, and separable-degree criteria: in characteristic , an element of an algebraic extension is purely inseparable over the base exactly when some -power of it lies in the base.
Verification
The class satisfies by construction, and , since is generated as a -algebra by . If is irreducible, then is a field of degree over and is a primitive element; the next steps establish the irreducibility.
Assume for contradiction that is reducible. Since is a principal ideal domain [F1], a reducible nonzero non-unit factors into irreducibles, so has a monic irreducible factor of degree with . Let , a field by [F2], and let denote the class of in ; then , and because divides in .
In the binomial theorem [F3] together with for [F4] gives the Frobenius identity , the intermediate coefficients vanishing in of characteristic ; hence , considered in , divides .
On the other hand , so the division algorithm in the field [F5] gives , that is, divides . In the principal ideal domain [F1], the degree-one polynomial is irreducible (a factorization would have to split the degree into two nonnegative degrees, forcing a degree- factor, which is a unit of ), so the only monic factor of of degree is ; since is monic of degree , we get .
Comparing the coefficient of in the identity of step 4.1 gives: the coefficient of in is , and the coefficient of in lies in , so . Since and has characteristic , the class of in is nonzero and invertible, so ; then , contradicting the hypothesis . Hence is irreducible, is a field with , and .
Now compute the differentials. Apply [F6] with , , , and : the derivative is , because in , so the relation submodule is zero and with the image of the basis vector written . Thus as -modules, in particular because the field is nonzero.
The extension is finite, algebraic and purely inseparable: every element of is a polynomial with by step 5.1, and its -th power is because and the Frobenius map is additive in characteristic [F3]. So every element of has its -th power in , and the elementwise criterion of [F7] makes purely inseparable; by step 5.1 it is finite of degree .
Combining steps 6.1 and 6.2: is a free -module of rank one and hence nonzero, while is a finite algebraic purely inseparable extension. This refutes the displayed statement and shows that the vanishing of for finite separable extensions cannot be extended to all finite algebraic extensions; the obstruction is precisely the vanishing derivative of the inseparable polynomial .
Depends on
- For every field $F$, $F[x]$ is a principal ideal domain
- For a nonconstant $p$ in $F[x]$, the ideal $(p)$ is maximal and $F[x]/(p)$ is a field exactly when $p$ is irreducible
- The binomial theorem over an arbitrary commutative ring
- A prime $p$ divides $\binom pk$ for $0<k<p$
- Division algorithm for polynomials over a field
- Jacobian presentation of Ω
- Pure inseparability and its conjugate, embedding, and separable-degree criteria
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Algebra 10.131.9 and 10.158.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vakil 22.2.F, p.577 (standard reference, not scraped)