Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A purely inseparable field has nonzero Omega

Statement refuted

“If L/k is a finite algebraic field extension, then ΩL/k=0.”

Counterexample

Let k be a field of characteristic p>0 and let a∈k be an element that is not a p-th power, a∉kp={cp:c∈k}. Set L=k[X]/(Xp−a) and let α be the class of X, so that αp=a and L=k(α). Then Xp−a is irreducible over k, so L is a field, finite of degree p over k, and purely inseparable over k; nevertheless ΩL/k=L dα  ≠  0, with basis dα over L. The vanishing derivative of Xp−a is exactly what removes the relation in the Jacobian presentation of ΩL/k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k of characteristic p>0, an element a∈k∖kp, the polynomial f=Xp−a∈k[X], the quotient L=k[X]/(f), and the class α of X in L.

[F1]

For every field F, F[x] is a principal ideal domain: over a field F the ring F[x] is a principal ideal domain, so every element factors into irreducibles and every irreducible is prime.

[F2]

For a nonconstant p in F[x], the ideal (p) is maximal and F[x]/(p) is a field exactly when p is irreducible: for a nonconstant q∈F[x], the quotient F[x]/(q) is a field if and only if q is irreducible.

[F3]

The binomial theorem over an arbitrary commutative ring: in a commutative ring, (u+v)p=∑i=0p(pi)up−ivi.

[F4]

A prime p divides (pk) for 0<k<p: p∣(pi) for 0<i<p.

[F5]

Division algorithm for polynomials over a field: for a field F, every g∈F[x] and every nonzero divisor d admit g=qd+r with r=0 or deg⁡r<deg⁡d; in particular division by the monic polynomial X−x evaluates: g=q (X−x)+g(x).

[F6]

Jacobian presentation of Ω: for P=A[x1,…,xn] and B=P/(f1,…,fr) one has ΩB/A≅Bn/∑jB(∂fj/∂x1,…,∂fj/∂xn); in particular for n=r=1, ΩB/A≅B/(q′) for q the single relation.

[F7]

Pure inseparability and its conjugate, embedding, and separable-degree criteria: in characteristic p>0, an element of an algebraic extension is purely inseparable over the base exactly when some p-power of it lies in the base.

Verification

1.1

The class α satisfies αp=a by construction, and L=k(α), since L is generated as a k-algebra by α. If f=Xp−a is irreducible, then L is a field of degree p over k and α is a primitive element; the next steps establish the irreducibility.

given
2.1

Assume for contradiction that f is reducible. Since k[X] is a principal ideal domain [F1], a reducible nonzero non-unit factors into irreducibles, so f has a monic irreducible factor m of degree d with 1≤d≤p−1. Let A=k[X]/(m), a field by [F2], and let x denote the class of X in A; then m(x)=0, and xp=a because m divides f=Xp−a in k[X]⊆A[X].

F1F2step 1.1
3.1

In A[X] the binomial theorem [F3] together with p∣(pi) for 0<i<p [F4] gives the Frobenius identity (X−x)p=Xp−xp=Xp−a, the intermediate coefficients vanishing in A of characteristic p; hence m, considered in A[X], divides (X−x)p.

F3F4step 2.1
4.1

On the other hand m(x)=0, so the division algorithm in the field A [F5] gives m=q (X−x)+m(x)=q (X−x), that is, X−x divides m. In the principal ideal domain A[X] [F1], the degree-one polynomial X−x is irreducible (a factorization would have to split the degree 1 into two nonnegative degrees, forcing a degree-0 factor, which is a unit of A[X]), so the only monic factor of (X−x)p of degree d is (X−x)d; since m is monic of degree d, we get m=(X−x)d.

F1F5step 3.1
5.1

Comparing the coefficient of Xd−1 in the identity m=(X−x)d of step 4.1 gives: the coefficient of Xd−1 in (X−x)d is −d x, and the coefficient of Xd−1 in m∈k[X] lies in k, so d x∈k. Since 1≤d≤p−1 and k has characteristic p, the class of d in k is nonzero and invertible, so x=d−1(d x)∈k; then a=xp∈kp, contradicting the hypothesis a∉kp. Hence f=Xp−a is irreducible, L is a field with [L:k]=p, and L=k(α).

step 2.1step 4.1given
6.1

Now compute the differentials. Apply [F6] with A=k, n=r=1, P=k[X], q=f=Xp−a and B=L: the derivative is f′=pXp−1=0, because p=0 in k, so the relation submodule L⋅f′(α) is zero and ΩL/k≅L/(0) with the image of the basis vector written dα. Thus ΩL/k≅L dα≅L as L-modules, in particular ΩL/k≠0 because the field L is nonzero.

F6step 5.1
6.2

The extension is finite, algebraic and purely inseparable: every element of L=k(α) is a polynomial ∑iciαi with ci∈k by step 5.1, and its p-th power is ∑icipai∈k because αp=a and the Frobenius map is additive in characteristic p [F3]. So every element of L has its p-th power in k, and the elementwise criterion of [F7] makes L/k purely inseparable; by step 5.1 it is finite of degree p.

F3F7step 5.1given
7.1

Combining steps 6.1 and 6.2: ΩL/k is a free L-module of rank one and hence nonzero, while L/k is a finite algebraic purely inseparable extension. This refutes the displayed statement and shows that the vanishing of Ω for finite separable extensions cannot be extended to all finite algebraic extensions; the obstruction is precisely the vanishing derivative f′=0 of the inseparable polynomial Xp−a.

step 6.1step 6.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources