Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A conormal left map with nonzero kernel

Statement refuted

“For an ideal I of a ring P, the conormal map I/I2→B⊗PΩP/A is injective.”

Counterexample

Let k be a field, P=k[x], and let I=(x2)⊆P with quotient B=P/I=k[x]/(x2). In the conormal sequence I/I2⟶B⊗PΩP/k⟶ΩB/k⟶0 the class [x3]∈I/I2=(x2)/(x4) is nonzero, but its image 1⊗d(x3)=3x2 dx is 0 in B⊗PΩP/k≅B dx, because x2=0 in B. Hence the left map has a nonzero kernel, in every characteristic: for p=3 the element 3x2 is already 0 in P, and for p≠3 it becomes 0 after the identification. In particular the sequence is only right exact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the polynomial algebra P=k[x], the principal ideal I=(x2)=x2P, the quotient B=P/I and the class x3∈I.

[F1]

Conormal exact sequence for an algebra quotient: for a ring map A→P, an ideal I⊆P and B=P/I, the sequence I/I2→αB⊗PΩP/A→ΩB/A→0 is exact with α sending the class of i∈I to 1⊗di; no injectivity of α is asserted.

[F2]

Polynomial differentials are free with n=1: ΩP/k is free with basis dx, and dg=(∂g/∂x)dx for every g∈P, where ∂/∂x is the k-derivation with ∂x/∂x=1; for the powers this gives ∂(xn)/∂x=n xn−1.

[F3]

Derivation of an algebra: the map d is a k-derivation, so it is additive, kills k, and satisfies the Leibniz rule.

[F4]

Over an integral domain, degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials: in an integral domain, nonzero polynomials satisfy deg⁡(fg)=deg⁡f+deg⁡g and fg≠0.

Verification

1.1

Apply [F1] with A=k: the sequence I/I2→αB⊗PΩP/k→ΩB/k→0 is exact, α sends the class of i∈I to 1⊗di, and the statement of [F1] explicitly leaves injectivity of α open.

F1given
1.2

The powers of the ideal: I=x2P and I2=x4P, since I2 is generated by the products of two elements of I, and x2f⋅x2g=x4fg. Hence I/I2=(x2)/(x4). The class [x3] is nonzero: if x3∈(x4), there would be g∈P with x3=x4g, so deg⁡(x3)=3 equals deg⁡(x4g)=4+deg⁡g for g≠0 and is impossible for g=0, by the degree rule of [F4] applied in the integral domain P=k[x].

F4given
1.3

The target: by [F2] the module ΩP/k is free with basis dx, so B⊗PΩP/k≅B dx as B-modules, via b⊗dx↦b dx; here B=B is written as usual and x2=0 in B because I=(x2).

F2given
2.1

The image of the class: by step 1.1, α([x3])=1⊗d(x3). By [F2] the derivation d satisfies d(x3)=(∂(x3)/∂x) dx=3x2 dx, the coefficient 3 being read in k; by the Leibniz rule [F3] this is the same as ∂(x3)/∂x=3x2 obtained from ∂(xn)/∂x=nxn−1.

F2F3
3.1

Under the identification of step 1.3 the element 1⊗3x2dx of step 2.1 is 3x2⋅dx∈B dx, and this is 0 since x2=0 in B. So α([x3])=0, while [x3]≠0 by step 1.2; the class [x3] therefore lies in the nonzero kernel of α, in every characteristic: for p=3 the coefficient 3x2 is already zero in P, and for p≠3 it is nonzero in P dx but its image in B dx vanishes.

step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1
4.1

Consequently the left map α ⁣:I/I2→B⊗PΩP/k of the conormal sequence is not injective, so the sequence is exact at B⊗PΩP/k and at ΩB/k but not at I/I2; the sequence is only right exact. The witness is the single element [x3], whose image is 3x2 dx=0. This refutes the displayed statement and shows why injectivity of α is deliberately excluded from [F1].

step 1.1step 3.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources