How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quotient sheaves and representable quotients for pre-relations and group actions
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice for the sheafification and represented-sheaf suppliers used below. Work on a fixed big fppf site of -schemes as in Stacks Section 34.7. Let be a field, and let be two morphisms of -schemes with common target (Morphisms of schemes); such a pair is a pre-relation on .
The naive quotient presheaf is the functor on the category of -schemes sending a -scheme to the quotient of the set (Fibre product of schemes) by the equivalence relation generated by ; its value at is the set of -points of modulo the relation generated by . In general is only a presheaf (Presheaves, covariantly and contravariantly representable functors, and representations).
An fppf sheaf on this category is a presheaf such that for every -scheme and every fppf covering family — a set-indexed family of flat morphisms locally of finite presentation which is jointly surjective onto (Faithfully flat scheme morphism, Locally finite presentation morphisms) — the diagram is an equalizer. The fppf quotient sheaf is the sheafification of for this topology: a morphism of presheaves with an fppf sheaf, initial among morphisms from to fppf sheaves. Every representable presheaf is an fppf sheaf (Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent); a -scheme represents the quotient sheaf when there is a natural isomorphism (Presheaves, covariantly and contravariantly representable functors, and representations), and then is unique up to unique isomorphism.
For a group scheme of finite type over (Group schemes of finite type over a field) acting on one takes with the second projection and the action morphism, and writes ; for and a closed subgroup scheme (Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes) acting by right translation one takes , , , and writes . The natural map from the naive quotient presheaf to its quotient sheaf is generally not an isomorphism; sheafification can both identify sections that agree locally and introduce sections that only have local representatives. The orbit set is only .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Faithfully flat scheme morphism
- Fibre product of schemes
- Group schemes of finite type over a field
- Locally finite presentation morphisms
- Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes
- Morphisms of schemes
- Presheaves, covariantly and contravariantly representable functors, and representations
- Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent
Used by
- A quotient stack need not be a scheme Counterexample
- The orbit set of k-points need not be the k-points of the fppf quotient sheaf Counterexample
- Algebraic group actions, orbit maps, orbit subschemes and scheme-theoretic stabilizers Definition
- The quotient of GL2 by the diagonal torus is the complement of the diagonal in P1 x P1 Example
- Central characters and descent along a central isogeny Lemma
- Criterion for a scheme to represent an fppf quotient sheaf Lemma
- A faithfully flat orbit map represents the coset quotient sheaf Proposition
- Orbit sets, fppf quotient sheaves and representing schemes are three different objects Remark
- Affine finite locally free equivalence relations have finite locally free scheme quotients Theorem
- Homogeneous spaces of smooth affine groups are separated schemes Theorem
- Solvable subgroups, the radical, and the Borel intersection Theorem
- The quotient of a connected group by a Borel subgroup of maximal dimension is complete Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Groupoid Schemes, Sections 39.20 and 39.23 (tags 02VG, 03BD, 03C5, 03BM, 03BE) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Topologies on Schemes, Section 34.7 (tags 021Q, 021R, 021S) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Sites and Sheaves, Sections 7.6-7.25 (tag 00VM) (standard reference, not scraped)