How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vanishing ideals and zero loci form a Galois connection
Statement
Let be an algebraically closed field, let , and let be an ideal. Then Consequently,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An algebraically closed field , a subset , and an ideal .
is the set of points where every polynomial in vanishes (An affine algebraic set in affine space).
is the set of polynomials vanishing at every point of (The vanishing ideal of a subset of affine space).
Proof
If and , then every point of lies in , so [L1] says vanishes at every point of . Therefore by [L2], and hence .
Conversely, if and , then every polynomial in lies in , so [L2] says every polynomial in vanishes at . By [L1], this means . Hence .
Applying steps 1.1 and 1.2 with yields , and applying them with yields .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · one level
2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, paragraph 2.23 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Donu Arapura, Notes on Basic Algebraic Geometry, Proposition 1.3.1 and Lemma 1.6.1 (standard reference, not scraped)