How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A dominant affine map factors finitely over relative affine space after shrinking the base
Statement
Let be dominant between irreducible affine varieties, put , and let . There are and elements , algebraically independent over , such that is module-finite over .
Work over a fixed algebraically closed field , with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
For irreducible classical , the fraction fields of all nonempty affine charts identify canonically; denote the resulting field by . A dominant morphism between irreducible classical varieties induces an injection . Dominant means that the image is dense. Work over a fixed algebraically closed field , with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Function fields and dominant pullbacks on general varieties).
Let be a field and let be a nonzero finite-type -algebra. Then there exist algebraically independent elements such that is a module-finite algebra over the polynomial ring . (Noether normalisation yields module finiteness over a polynomial subring).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a classical affine variety over an algebraically closed field , and let . Put . A function is called regular on if there exist finitely many pairs in such that and Write for the ring of regular functions on . Then evaluation induces a ring isomorphism If , both sides are the zero ring. (Regular functions on a principal open are the principal localization of the coordinate ring).
Proof
Dominance makes injective and identifies their fraction fields with . Put . The localization is a nonzero finite-type -domain inside , with that same fraction field.
Apply normalization over the field to obtain algebraically independent over which is module-finite. Their number is because the fraction field is algebraic over the fraction field of the normalization polynomial ring. Choose finite -algebra generators of . Each satisfies a monic equation over .
Every is a fraction with numerator in and nonzero denominator in . Invert the product of these denominators and all denominators in the finitely many monic-equation coefficients. The product is nonzero because is a domain, and an empty product is . Now , and the same equations are monic over . Independence descends from . If the equation degrees are , the finitely many monomials with span over this polynomial subring by repeated monic reduction. The principal-open supplier identifies the localized rings with the corresponding open-chart rings. This works also for .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Vakil Theorem 12.4.1 proof, pp.354–356 (July 27 2024) (standard reference, not scraped)