How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Function fields and dominant pullbacks on general varieties
Statement
For irreducible classical , the fraction fields of all nonempty affine charts identify canonically; denote the resulting field by . A dominant morphism between irreducible classical varieties induces an injection . Dominant means that the image is dense.
Work over a fixed algebraically closed field , with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Every classical variety is Noetherian and has finitely many irreducible components. Every open or closed subvariety has a finite affine cover. Work over a fixed algebraically closed field , with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions).
Under AC (The Axiom of Choice), every nonempty affine open of an affine variety has its fraction field canonically identified with that of the ambient variety, compatibly with further restriction (The function field is independent of the chosen nonempty principal affine open).
Under AC, a dominant rational map between classical affine varieties pulls back their function fields injectively and compatibly with restrictions (Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially).
Every nonempty open subset of an affine chart contains a nonempty principal affine open (Principal opens form a basis and multiply under intersection).
Proof
One may describe a rational function as a regular function on a nonempty open, with two representatives identified when they agree on a nonempty open of their common domain. In an irreducible space every finite intersection of nonempty opens is nonempty, so this is an equivalence relation. On an irreducible affine chart , a regular function is locally a quotient of polynomial functions. Any one nonempty such neighborhood therefore represents an element of , and conversely each fraction is regular on its nonempty denominator open. Equality on a nonempty open implies equality of fractions because the coordinate ring is a domain. This also agrees with the supplied principal-open field identification.
Any two nonempty affine charts meet because is irreducible. By [F4], their overlap contains a nonempty affine principal open in either chart. Restricting rational representatives to that common open and applying [F2] identifies both fields. Compatibility under further restriction makes this identification independent of the chosen common open, and triple overlaps give the cocycle identity. Affine charts exist by the finite-cover result.
If is dominant, the inverse image of a nonempty target open is nonempty. For nonempty source open and target open , is nonempty: the image of is dense in the irreducible target, so it meets . Choose an affine target chart and then, inside , an affine source chart by [F1] and [F4]. This restriction is dominant, so [F3] gives an injective affine function-field pullback. The restriction compatibility from steps 1.1–2.1 and [F3] identifies it with a unique injection between the general fields. The use of AC is inherited exactly at [F2] and [F3].
Depends on
Used by
- A dominant image contains a dense open Corollary
- A dense hypersurface chart with a nonzero partial derivative Lemma
- A dominant affine map factors finitely over relative affine space after shrinking the base Lemma
- A dominant map has a surjective differential on a dense source open Lemma
- Nonempty opens preserve irreducible dimension Lemma
- Dimension equals transcendence degree Theorem
- Equal dimension is equivalent to generic quasi-finiteness Theorem
- Every fibre component has the expected lower bound Theorem
- Fibres have pure expected dimension over a dense open Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Milne §§5j–k pp.115–116 (standard reference, not scraped)