Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Function fields and dominant pullbacks on general varieties

Statement

For irreducible classical X, the fraction fields of all nonempty affine charts identify canonically; denote the resulting field by k(X). A dominant morphism f:X→Y between irreducible classical varieties induces an injection f∗:k(Y)↪k(X). Dominant means that the image is dense.

Work over a fixed algebraically closed field k, with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

[F1]

Every classical variety is Noetherian and has finitely many irreducible components. Every open or closed subvariety has a finite affine cover. Work over a fixed algebraically closed field k, with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions).

[F2]

Under AC (The Axiom of Choice), every nonempty affine open U of an affine variety has its fraction field canonically identified with that of the ambient variety, compatibly with further restriction (The function field is independent of the chosen nonempty principal affine open).

[F3]

Under AC, a dominant rational map between classical affine varieties pulls back their function fields injectively and compatibly with restrictions (Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially).

[F4]

Every nonempty open subset of an affine chart contains a nonempty principal affine open (Principal opens form a basis and multiply under intersection).

Proof

1.1F2

One may describe a rational function as a regular function on a nonempty open, with two representatives identified when they agree on a nonempty open of their common domain. In an irreducible space every finite intersection of nonempty opens is nonempty, so this is an equivalence relation. On an irreducible affine chart V, a regular function is locally a quotient of polynomial functions. Any one nonempty such neighborhood therefore represents an element of Frac⁡k[V], and conversely each fraction is regular on its nonempty denominator open. Equality on a nonempty open implies equality of fractions because the coordinate ring is a domain. This also agrees with the supplied principal-open field identification.

2.1F1F2F4step 1.1

Any two nonempty affine charts meet because X is irreducible. By [F4], their overlap contains a nonempty affine principal open in either chart. Restricting rational representatives to that common open and applying [F2] identifies both fields. Compatibility under further restriction makes this identification independent of the chosen common open, and triple overlaps give the cocycle identity. Affine charts exist by the finite-cover result.

3.1F1F3F4step 2.1∎

If f is dominant, the inverse image of a nonempty target open is nonempty. For nonempty source open V and target open W, V∩f−1(W) is nonempty: the image of V is dense in the irreducible target, so it meets W. Choose an affine target chart W and then, inside f−1(W), an affine source chart by [F1] and [F4]. This restriction is dominant, so [F3] gives an injective affine function-field pullback. The restriction compatibility from steps 1.1–2.1 and [F3] identifies it with a unique injection between the general fields. The use of AC is inherited exactly at [F2] and [F3].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources