How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Chevalley: images of constructible sets are constructible
Statement
Every morphism of classical varieties sends every constructible subset of to a constructible subset of . In particular is constructible.
Work over a fixed algebraically closed field , with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
A subset of a classical variety is locally closed if for some open and closed . A subset is constructible if it is a finite union of locally closed subsets. The empty union is allowed, so is constructible. Work over a fixed algebraically closed field , with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Locally closed and constructible subsets).
Constructible subsets are closed under finite unions, finite intersections and complements. If is constructible in and is any subspace, is constructible in . If is locally closed and is constructible in , then is constructible in . Work over a fixed algebraically closed field , with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Constructible subsets form a Boolean algebra).
The image of a dominant morphism between irreducible affine varieties contains a nonempty principal open subset of . Work over a fixed algebraically closed field , with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Dominant affine images contain a principal open).
Every classical variety is Noetherian and has finitely many irreducible components. Every open or closed subvariety has a finite affine cover. Work over a fixed algebraically closed field , with the Axiom of Choice. Classical varieties are separated and admit finite affine covers; they may be reducible or empty unless irreducibility is specified. Irreducible means nonempty. All fibres and points below are classical closed-point fibres and points. (Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions).
Proof
First prove, for fixed , that the image of every closed subvariety is constructible, by Noetherian induction on . The empty case has empty image. If is reducible, its finitely many proper irreducible components have constructible images by the induction hypothesis and their finite union is constructible. It remains to treat nonempty irreducible , assuming the result on its proper closed subsets.
Put , an irreducible closed subvariety, since a continuous image and its closure preserve irreducibility. Choose a nonempty affine chart and a nonempty affine chart . The restriction is dominant: every nonempty target open has nonempty open inverse image in irreducible , which meets . The affine image lemma gives a nonempty open contained in , hence in . It is open in and locally closed in .
The subset is proper closed in , because factors through and is open in . Its image is constructible by induction. Thus is constructible. Noetherianity validates the induction: a failure would have an inclusion-minimal closed counterexample, contradicted by these reductions.
For a constructible , write it as a finite union of locally closed subsets . Each is itself a classical variety with a finite affine cover. Apply the result just proved to the whole source for the morphism . Then is constructible. This includes and .
Depends on
Used by
- A dominant image contains a dense open Corollary
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Milne Theorem 9.7 (standard reference, not scraped)