How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One-variable integral correction after leading-coefficient localization
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, let be a unital ring map of commutative rings, and let be integral over the image subring (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers, Integral ring maps and integral extensions). Let be a polynomial with
- If is monic, then there exists such that is integral over .
- In general there exist and an integer such that is integral over .
No injectivity of , no regularity of the leading coefficient , and no reducedness or domain hypothesis is imposed: may be , a zero divisor or a nilpotent, may be or a zero divisor, and the polynomial ring and all localisations are taken over the possibly nonreduced ring . Part 1 is the monic case of the one-variable integral correction; part 2 obtains it in general by inverting .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital ring map of commutative rings, an element integral over the subring , and a polynomial with .
An element of a commutative ring is integral over a subring exactly when it is a root of a monic polynomial in (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).
Let be a commutative ring and let be monic. For every there are unique with and or (Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring).
Let be a homomorphism of commutative rings, multiplicative and . If is integral over then is integral over in ; and if is integral over in then some makes integral over (Integrality and integral closure commute with localisation).
If and are integral ring maps of commutative rings then the composite is integral (Integral extensions are transitive).
Let be commutative rings with and . Then is integral over if and only if is finitely generated as an -module (Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element).
Let be a commutative ring, multiplicative, and . Then the image of in is zero if and only if for some ; and is the zero ring if and only if (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).
For a commutative ring and the powers of form a multiplicative subset and the principal localisation has elements ; is the zero ring (Principal localisation ).
Let be commutative rings with . The elements of integral over form a subring of (Integral elements over a nonzero base ring form a subring).
Proof
We first dispose of the degenerate cases. If then and , so , and satisfies both claims. If then also and satisfies both claims. If is nilpotent, say with , then is a root of the monic polynomial , hence integral over by [L1], so satisfies claim 1 and satisfies claim 2. If is nilpotent, say with , then is integral over by [L1], so satisfies claim 2. We therefore assume , , not nilpotent, and in the treatment of claim 2 the element not nilpotent.
Assume that is monic, so that claim 1 is at stake. Since , choose with . By [L2] applied to the monic divisor there are with and or . Set . Then . If is nilpotent, say for some , then is integral over by the monic equation , proving claim 1; below assume is not nilpotent.
The element is integral over : the given element is integral over and , while makes the subring nonzero, so [L8] applies.
Write with (a monic constant is the case ) and write with for . In the principal localisation of [L7] the identity of step 1.2 becomes , that is, the identity in . Its coefficients lie in the subring and its leading coefficient is ; by [L1] the element is integral over .
By [L5] applied to the nonzero ring and the integral element of step 2.2, the subalgebra is a finitely generated -module, so every one of its elements is integral over by [L8]; equivalently the ring map is integral.
Put and inside . The element is integral over : its monic equation over from step 2.1 remains a monic equation over the larger subring . By step 3.1, is integral. Since the integral elements over form a subring by [L8], the ring is integral over ; transitivity [L4] makes integral. Therefore is integral over by [L1].
By [L1] there are an integer and coefficients with . Each is a finite sum with and , since is generated as a subring by and . Choose at least every exponent (take if there are no summands). Multiplying the relation by in gives where every exponent is nonnegative.
The identity of step 5.1 holds in , so by the kernel criterion [L6] applied to the localisation map and the element there is with in . Hence in : a monic polynomial relation for with coefficients in . By [L1] the element is integral over , which is claim 1.
Now let be arbitrary with , and assume first that is not nilpotent. Then the principal localisation of [L7] is nonzero by [L6], since its multiplicative set contains while no power of is ; and is monic. Let , let be the localisation of , and let be the image of , so that . The element is integral over , because the monic equation for over transports along the ring map induced by ; and lies in , because for some gives . Applying claim 1, already proved in steps 1.2-6.1 for the data , yields with integral over .
Write as a finite sum of terms with and , and let be the maximum of the finitely many exponents occurring, with when . Then is the image of some under , namely for the finitely many summands of . With this and , the image in of is , and this is integral over because is (step 7.1) and .
Apply clause 2 of [L3] to the ring map , the multiplicative subset and the element : its image in is integral over by step 8.1, so there exists such that is integral over . With and one has , which is integral over . This is claim 2 for arbitrary with .
Together, step 1.1 (the degenerate cases, including nilpotent and nilpotent ), step 6.1 (claim 1) and step 9.1 (claim 2) prove both assertions of the statement for every commutative ring , every unital , every integral over and every with ; this includes , monic constants , the zero element , and zero divisors or nilpotents among the . ∎
Depends on
- Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers
- Integral ring maps and integral extensions
- Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring
- Integral extensions are transitive
- Integrality and integral closure commute with localisation
- Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element
- Integral elements over a nonzero base ring form a subring
- Principal localisation $R_f=\{1,f,f^2,\ldots\}^{-1}R$
- Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Commutative Algebra, Section 10.123, Lemmas 10.123.2 and 10.123.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, version 4.03, Section 17 (standard reference, not scraped)