Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One-variable integral correction after leading-coefficient localization

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring, let φ:R[x]→S be a unital ring map of commutative rings, and let t∈S be integral over the image subring φ(R[x])⊆S (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers, Integral ring maps and integral extensions). Let p=a0+a1x+⋯+akxk∈R[x] be a polynomial with

t φ(p)∈Im⁡(φ).

  1. If p is monic, then there exists q∈R[x] such that t−φ(q) is integral over R.
  2. In general there exist q∈R[x] and an integer n≥0 such that φ(ak)nt−φ(q) is integral over R.

No injectivity of φ, no regularity of the leading coefficient ak, and no reducedness or domain hypothesis is imposed: ak may be 0, a zero divisor or a nilpotent, t may be 0 or a zero divisor, and the polynomial ring and all localisations are taken over the possibly nonreduced ring R. Part 1 is the monic case of the one-variable integral correction; part 2 obtains it in general by inverting ak.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A unital ring map φ:R[x]→S of commutative rings, an element t∈S integral over the subring φ(R[x])⊆S, and a polynomial p=a0+a1x+⋯+akxk∈R[x] with t φ(p)∈Im⁡(φ).

[L1]

An element b of a commutative ring B is integral over a subring A exactly when it is a root of a monic polynomial in A[X] (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).

[L2]

Let R be a commutative ring and let g∈R[x] be monic. For every f∈R[x] there are unique q,r∈R[x] with f=qg+r and r=0 or deg⁡r<deg⁡g (Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring).

[L3]

Let A→B be a homomorphism of commutative rings, S⊆A multiplicative and b∈B. If b is integral over A then b/1 is integral over S−1A in S−1B; and if b/1 is integral over S−1A in S−1B then some s∈S makes sb integral over A (Integrality and integral closure commute with localisation).

[L4]

If A→B and B→C are integral ring maps of commutative rings then the composite A→C is integral (Integral extensions are transitive).

[L5]

Let A⊆B be commutative rings with A≠0 and b∈B. Then b is integral over A if and only if A[b] is finitely generated as an A-module (Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element).

[L6]

Let R be a commutative ring, S⊆R multiplicative, and r∈R. Then the image of r in S−1R is zero if and only if ur=0 for some u∈S; and S−1R is the zero ring if and only if 0∈S (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).

[L7]

For a commutative ring R and f∈R the powers of f form a multiplicative subset and the principal localisation Rf has elements r/fn; R0 is the zero ring (Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R).

[L8]

Let A⊆B be commutative rings with A≠0. The elements of B integral over A form a subring of B (Integral elements over a nonzero base ring form a subring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

We first dispose of the degenerate cases. If R=0 then R[x]=0 and 1S=φ(0)=0, so S=0, t=0 and q=0 satisfies both claims. If S=0 then also t=0 and q=0 satisfies both claims. If t is nilpotent, say tN=0 with N≥1, then t is a root of the monic polynomial XN, hence integral over R by [L1], so q=0 satisfies claim 1 and (n,q)=(0,0) satisfies claim 2. If ak is nilpotent, say akN=0 with N≥1, then φ(ak)Nt−φ(0)=0 is integral over R by [L1], so (n,q)=(N,0) satisfies claim 2. We therefore assume R≠0, S≠0, t not nilpotent, and in the treatment of claim 2 the element ak not nilpotent.

givenL1
1.2

Assume that p is monic, so that claim 1 is at stake. Since tφ(p)∈Im⁡(φ), choose r∈R[x] with tφ(p)=φ(r). By [L2] applied to the monic divisor p there are q,r′∈R[x] with r=qp+r′ and r′=0 or deg⁡r′<deg⁡p. Set t′=t−φ(q)∈S. Then t′φ(p)=tφ(p)−φ(q)φ(p)=φ(r)−φ(qp)=φ(r′). If t′ is nilpotent, say t′N=0 for some N≥1, then t′ is integral over R by the monic equation XN=0, proving claim 1; below assume t′ is not nilpotent.

givenL1L2construct
2.1

The element t′=t−φ(q) is integral over φ(R[x]): the given element t is integral over φ(R[x]) and φ(q)∈φ(R[x]), while 1S≠0 makes the subring φ(R[x])⊆S nonzero, so [L8] applies.

step 1.2L8algebra
2.2

Write p=xd+pd−1xd−1+⋯+p0 with d≥0 (a monic constant is the case d=0) and write r′=rd−1′xd−1+⋯+r0′ with ri′=0 for i≥deg⁡r′. In the principal localisation St′ of [L7] the identity t′φ(p)=φ(r′) of step 1.2 becomes φ(p)=t′−1φ(r′), that is, the identity φ(x)d+∑i=0d−1(φ(pi)−t′−1φ(ri′))φ(x)i=0 in St′. Its coefficients φ(pi)−t′−1φ(ri′) lie in the subring φ(R)[1/t′]⊆St′ and its leading coefficient is 1; by [L1] the element φ(x) is integral over φ(R)[1/t′].

step 1.2L1L7algebra
3.1

By [L5] applied to the nonzero ring φ(R)[1/t′] and the integral element φ(x) of step 2.2, the subalgebra φ(R)[1/t′][φ(x)] is a finitely generated φ(R)[1/t′]-module, so every one of its elements is integral over φ(R)[1/t′] by [L8]; equivalently the ring map φ(R)[1/t′]→φ(R)[1/t′][φ(x)] is integral.

step 2.2L5L8algebra
4.1

Put A=φ(R)[1/t′] and B=A[φ(x)] inside St′. The element t′ is integral over B: its monic equation over φ(R[x]) from step 2.1 remains a monic equation over the larger subring B. By step 3.1, A→B is integral. Since the integral elements over B form a subring by [L8], the ring B[t′] is integral over B; transitivity [L4] makes A→B[t′] integral. Therefore t′∈B[t′] is integral over A by [L1].

step 2.1step 3.1L1L4L8
5.1

By [L1] there are an integer e≥1 and coefficients c0,…,ce−1∈A=φ(R)[1/t′] with t′e+∑i=0e−1cit′i=0. Each ci is a finite sum ∑j=1miφ(bij)/t′ℓij with bij∈R and ℓij≥0, since A is generated as a subring by φ(R) and t′−1. Choose N≥0 at least every exponent ℓij (take N=0 if there are no summands). Multiplying the relation by t′N in St′ gives t′e+N+∑i=0e−1∑j=1miφ(bij)t′ i+N−ℓij=0, where every exponent i+N−ℓij is nonnegative.

step 4.1L1L7algebra
6.1

The identity of step 5.1 holds in St′, so by the kernel criterion [L6] applied to the localisation map S→St′ and the element b=t′e+N+∑i=0e−1∑j=1miφ(bij)t′ i+N−ℓij∈S there is M≥0 with t′Mb=0 in S. Hence t′e+N+M+∑i=0e−1∑j=1miφ(bij)t′ i+N−ℓij+M=0 in S: a monic polynomial relation for t′=t−φ(q) with coefficients in φ(R)⊆S. By [L1] the element t−φ(q) is integral over R, which is claim 1.

step 5.1L1L6algebra
7.1

Now let p=∑i=0kaixi be arbitrary with tφ(p)∈Im⁡(φ), and assume first that ak is not nilpotent. Then the principal localisation R′=Rak of [L7] is nonzero by [L6], since its multiplicative set contains 1=ak0 while no power of ak is 0; and p′=ak−1p=xk+∑i=0k−1(ai/ak)xi∈R′[x] is monic. Let S′=Sak, let φ′:R′[x]→S′ be the localisation of φ, and let t′∈S′ be the image of t, so that R′[x]=R[x]ak=Rak[x]. The element t′ is integral over φ′(R′[x]), because the monic equation for t over φ(R[x]) transports along the ring map induced by φ; and t′φ′(p′)=tφ(p)/ak lies in Im⁡(φ′), because tφ(p)=φ(r) for some r∈R[x] gives t′φ′(p′)=φ′(r/ak). Applying claim 1, already proved in steps 1.2-6.1 for the data (R′,S′,φ′,t′,p′), yields q′∈R′[x] with t′−φ′(q′) integral over R′.

step 6.1L1L6L7algebra
8.1

Write q′ as a finite sum of terms c/akm with c∈R[x] and m≥0, and let n be the maximum of the finitely many exponents m occurring, with n=0 when q′=0. Then aknq′ is the image of some q∈R[x] under R[x]→R′[x], namely q=∑jcjak n−mj for the finitely many summands cj/akmj of q′. With this n and q, the image in S′ of φ(ak)nt−φ(q) is aknt′−aknφ′(q′)=akn(t′−φ′(q′)), and this is integral over R′ because t′−φ′(q′) is (step 7.1) and akn∈R′.

step 7.1L1L7construct
9.1

Apply clause 2 of [L3] to the ring map R→S, the multiplicative subset {akm:m≥0}⊆R and the element b=φ(ak)nt−φ(q)∈S: its image in Sak=S′ is integral over Rak=R′ by step 8.1, so there exists m≥0 such that akmb is integral over R. With n′=m+n≥0 and q′′=akmq∈R[x] one has φ(ak)n′t−φ(q′′)=akm(φ(ak)nt−φ(q)), which is integral over R. This is claim 2 for arbitrary p with tφ(p)∈Im⁡(φ).

step 8.1L3algebra
10.1

Together, step 1.1 (the degenerate cases, including nilpotent ak and nilpotent t), step 6.1 (claim 1) and step 9.1 (claim 2) prove both assertions of the statement for every commutative ring R, every unital φ, every t integral over φ(R[x]) and every p with tφ(p)∈Im⁡(φ); this includes p=0, monic constants p, the zero element t=0, and zero divisors or nilpotents among the ai. ∎

step 1.1step 6.1step 9.1given

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources