Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normal scheme modifications and normalized point blowups

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the blowup and scheme-construction suppliers.

Normal schemes. A locally Noetherian scheme is normal if every local ring OX,x is an integrally closed domain (normal noetherian ring). This is a local condition on the local rings and is checked on an affine open cover; it does not require the global section ring to be a domain. The empty scheme is normal vacuously.

Normalization of an integral scheme. Let S be an integral scheme with function field K=K(S) (Integral schemes), and let Spec⁡A⊆S be a nonempty affine open subset. Write A‾ for the integral closure of A in K, that is, the subring of elements of K that are integral over A. The normalization of S is the S-scheme

ν ⁣:Sν⟶S

obtained by gluing the affine schemes Spec⁡A‾ over the nonempty affine open subsets Spec⁡A⊆S, inside the common function field K. This is well defined: by Integrality and integral closure commute with localisation the formation of A‾ commutes with localization, so for a principal open D(f)⊆Spec⁡A the canonical map (A‾)f→Af‾ is an isomorphism onto the integral closure of Af in K; the affine integral-closure algebras therefore identify on overlaps inside K and satisfy the cocycle identity, and Glue relative spectra of affine-local algebras constructs the glued scheme and its canonical morphism to S. The scheme Sν is integral, ν is affine, and K(Sν)=K; the normalization is characterized up to unique isomorphism over S by this construction. Finiteness of the normalization — that Sν→S is a finite morphism — is an additional assertion about S and is never part of the definition; it is proved separately on this page for the surfaces that occur below.

Modifications. Let S and X be integral schemes. A modification of S is a proper morphism f ⁣:X→S (Proper morphisms) that induces an isomorphism K(S)→K(X) of function fields, so that f is birational. A regular resolution of S is a modification f ⁣:X→S whose source X is regular (all local rings regular). The modulus here is a property of the morphism f, not of the source alone: the same scheme X may occur as source of modifications of several different integral schemes.

Point blowups and their normalization. Let S be a locally Noetherian integral scheme (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes) and let s∈S be a closed point whose ideal sheaf Is⊆OS is coherent and nonzero. The point blowup of S at s is the blowup Bl⁡s(S)→S of S along Is (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf). It is locally projective, hence proper, over S; a single global projective-space embedding is asserted only when the additional global-generation or projective-base hypotheses are available. The normalized point blowup of S at s is the composite

Bl⁡s(S)ν⟶Bl⁡s(S)⟶S,

that is, the point blowup followed by normalization of its source. It is a morphism of integral schemes. It is proper when the normalization morphism Bl⁡s(S)ν→Bl⁡s(S) is finite; no properness assertion is made when that finiteness has not been established. The finite-normalization results below verify this condition in the surface classes used in the resolution arguments.

Resolution by normalized point blowups. A resolution of S by normalized point blowups is a morphism X=Sn→Sn−1→⋯→S0=Sν→S obtained as follows: start with the normalization S0:=Sν of S; choose closed points si∈Si for i=0,…,n−1, each with nonzero coherent point ideal, and let Si+1 be the normalized point blowup of Si at si; require that each normalization in the sequence, including the initial normalization Sν→S, be finite, and that the terminal scheme Sn be regular. Each arrow Si+1→Si is then a modification, the composite is proper, and the terminal scheme is a regular resolution of S. If S is already normal, the initial normalization Sν→S is an isomorphism, so the definition then starts effectively at S itself; if S is regular, the empty sequence n=0 with S0=Sν=S exhibits the identity as a resolution by normalized point blowups.

Remarks

  • The definition does not assert that a resolution by normalized point blowups exists for a given integral scheme S: it names the shape of the object. Existence for surfaces is proved later on this page, under the hypotheses stated there.
  • Blowing up a regular point on a regular surface is generally not an isomorphism: its exceptional fibre is a projective line. The blowup remains regular, so its normalization is the identity and the map is still a proper birational modification. On a regular one-dimensional integral scheme, a closed-point ideal is invertible and its blowup is an isomorphism: at the point its stalk is the principal maximal ideal of a DVR, and away from the point it is the unit ideal. This need not hold on a singular curve. The resolution arguments below choose singular centres when they need to alter the regularity.
  • The phrase modification is used here only for integral schemes, so that function fields are defined and the birationality condition makes sense. No separatedness hypothesis beyond properness is imposed.
  • The normalization is defined by gluing over the nonempty affine opens of an integral scheme; on the empty scheme there is no function field and no normalization is defined.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources