Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational normal surface singularities and bounded modification cohomology

Definition

Assume AC and DC. A normal two-dimensional Noetherian local domain A essentially of finite type over a field or complete equicharacteristic local base defines a rational singularity if H1(Y,OY)=0 for every normal integral proper modification Y→Spec⁡A. Bounded modification H1 means these modules have uniformly bounded A-length. In both definitions it suffices to test projective modifications, or terminal schemes of finite normalized point-blowup sequences.

Remarks

  • Rationality is tested on all normal integral proper modifications, and the definition records that projective modifications and finite normalized point-blowup models suffice.
  • Boundedness is a statement about the family of all modifications, not about a single one.
  • The equivalence of the tests is supplied by the normalized-point domination lemma (Normalized point blowups dominate local normal surface modifications): a projective normalized point-blowup model dominating a given normal proper modification exists, the Leray injection of The Leray sequence for normal surface modifications embeds the cohomology of the given modification into that of the model, and the model has finite A-length by proper coherent finiteness and the codimension-one isomorphism. The restricted test classes are themselves normal proper modifications, so the reverse implication is immediate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources