Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Leray sequence for normal surface modifications

Statement

Assume AC and DC. Let A be a normal local domain of dimension two in the field/complete-equicharacteristic finite-type class, and X′→gX→Spec⁡A normal integral modifications. Then g∗OX′=OX and H1(X,OX)→H1(X′,OX′) is injective. If X is projective over A, there is a natural exact sequence 0→H1(X,OX)→H1(X′,OX′)→H0(X,R1g∗OX′)→0. The last sheaf is coherent, supported on finitely many closed points and generated by global sections.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A normal local domain A of dimension two in the field or complete-equicharacteristic finite-type class, and normal integral modifications X′→gX→Spec⁡A.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-dependent-choice. Let X be a set and let R⊆X×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when for every x∈X there is y∈X with xRy. The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)

[F3]

def-normal-surface-modification-and-normalized-point-blowup. Normal schemes. A locally Noetherian scheme is normal if every local ring OX,x is an integrally closed domain (def-normal-noetherian-ring). This is a local condition on the local rings and is checked on an affine open cover; it does not require the global section ring to be a domain. The empty scheme is normal vacuously. (def-normal-surface-modification-and-normalized-point-blowup)

[F4]

lem-local-normal-surface-modification-dimension-and-projective-cohomology. Assume AC and DC. Let (A,m) be a normal Noetherian local domain of dimension two and f:X→Spec⁡A an integral modification. Then X has dimension two, all closed points have local dimension two, f is an isomorphism off the closed point, f∗OX=OSpec⁡A, and its special fibre has dimension at most one. (Dimension and cohomology of local normal surface modifications)

[F5]

lem-surface-flat-base-change-coherent-cohomology-by-cech. Assume AC and DC. For a quasi-compact separated scheme X over a ring A, a quasi-coherent sheaf F and a flat A-algebra C, the canonical maps Hq(X,F)⊗AC→Hq(XC,FC) are isomorphisms for every q. No flatness of F over A is required. (Flat base change for quasi-coherent surface cohomology by Čech)

[F6]

lem-surface-modification-isomorphism-in-codimension-one. Assume AC. Let f:X→S be a modification of integral Noetherian schemes and let S be normal of dimension two. Then f is an isomorphism over an open subset containing every point of codimension at most one in S. The complement is a finite set of closed points. If every fibre is zero-dimensional, f is an isomorphism. (A normal-surface modification is an isomorphism in codimension one)

[F7]

thm-leray-spectral-sequence-for-sheaf-cohomology. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let f:X→Y be a morphism of schemes (more generally a continuous map of topological spaces) and let F be an abelian sheaf on X. (Leray spectral sequence for sheaf cohomology)

[F8]

thm-proper-pushforward-coherent. Assume the Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice, inherited from the affine localization theorem, the Čech comparison and the dévissage lemma cited below (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain). (Coherent higher direct images under proper morphisms)

Proof

1.1F4F8given

On each affine normal chart of X the proper pushforward of OX′ is a finite algebra contained in the common function field; its elements are integral over the normal chart ring, hence already belong to it, so g∗OX′=OX.

2.1F7step 1.1

The five-term exact sequence of the Leray spectral sequence for g therefore gives an injection H1(X,OX)→H1(X′,OX′) and identifies the cokernel with the kernel of the differential H0(X,R1g∗OX′)→H2(X,OX); no projectivity of either scheme is needed for this part.

3.1F4F6F8step 2.1

The codimension-one modification lemma shows that g is an isomorphism off finitely many closed points of X, and proper coherent finiteness makes R1g∗OX′ coherent and supported on that finite set. A coherent sheaf supported on finitely many closed points is pushed forward from a finite zero-dimensional Artinian closed subscheme, so it is generated by global sections and has no higher cohomology.

4.1F4F7step 3.1

If X is projective over A, the two-affine cover supplied by the projective modification helper gives H2(X,OX)=0, so the next term of the five-term sequence vanishes and yields the natural short exact sequence 0→H1(X,OX)→H1(X′,OX′)→H0(X,R1g∗OX′)→0.

5.1F1F2F5step 4.1∎

Localization and flat Cech comparison identify the stalk of R1g∗OX′ at a closed point with the first cohomology of the localized modification over the local ring, which gives the stated concrete description of the sheaf; the Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are inherited from the cited suppliers.

Remarks

  • The only place projectivity of X is used is the vanishing of H2 needed for the short exact sequence; the injection itself is general.
  • The last sheaf is carried by the finitely many points where the modification fails to be an isomorphism.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

89 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources