Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Separable finite surface extensions preserve bounded modification cohomology

Statement

Assume AC and DC. Let A⊂B be a finite injective local extension of permitted normal local surface domains with separable fraction-field extension. If modification H1 over A is uniformly bounded, so is modification H1 over B.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite injective local extension A⊂B of permitted normal local surface domains with separable fraction-field extension L/K of degree n, assuming modification H1 over A is uniformly bounded.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-dependent-choice. Let X be a set and let R⊆X×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when for every x∈X there is y∈X with xRy. The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)

[F3]

def-rational-normal-surface-singularity-and-bounded-modification-h1. Assume AC and DC. A normal two-dimensional Noetherian local domain A essentially of finite type over a field or complete equicharacteristic local base defines a rational singularity if H1(Y,OY)=0 for every normal integral proper modification Y→Spec⁡A. Bounded modification H1 means these modules have uniformly bounded A-length. (Rational normal surface singularities and bounded modification cohomology)

[F4]

lem-finite-domination-of-surface-modifications-via-relative-hilbert-scheme. Assume AC and DC. Let A be a normal Noetherian local domain of dimension two essentially of finite type over a field or a complete equicharacteristic Noetherian local ring. Let B be a finite normal local A-domain, and let Y→Spec⁡B be a normal integral modification. (Finite domination of surface modifications by a relative Hilbert scheme)

[F5]

lem-normal-surface-modification-leray-short-exact-sequence. Assume AC and DC. Let A be a normal local domain of dimension two in the field/complete-equicharacteristic finite-type class, and X′→gX→Spec⁡A normal integral modifications. Then g∗OX′=OX and H1(X,OX)→H1(X′,OX′) is injective. (The Leray sequence for normal surface modifications)

[F6]

lem-normal-surface-modification-uniform-principal-torsion-bound. Assume AC and DC. For a normal local surface domain A in the permitted finite-type class and 0≠a∈A, the lengths of H1(X,OX)[a] are uniformly bounded over all normal projective modifications X→Spec⁡A. (Uniform principal torsion bound for surface modification cohomology)

[F7]

lem-trace-pairing-for-a-finite-separable-extension. Let L/F be a finite separable field extension. Then the bilinear pairing L×L→F, (x,y)↦Tr⁡L/F(xy), is nondegenerate. (The trace pairing in a finite separable extension is nondegenerate)

[F8]

thm-long-exact-sequence-sheaf-cohomology. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let 0→F′→F→F′′→0 be a short exact sequence of abelian sheaves on a topological space X, and let Hq(X,−) be sheaf cohomology computed from the supplied functorial injective resolution datum I on Ab(X) (def-sheaf-cohomology-derived-global-sections). (Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology)

Proof

1.1F7given

Choose b1,…,bn∈B forming a K-basis of L; the trace Gram determinant d=det⁡(Tr⁡(bibj)) lies in A and is nonzero because the trace pairing of a separable extension is nondegenerate.

2.1F4F5givenstep 1.1

For a normal projective modification Y over B the Hilbert finite-domination helper produces a dominating normal projective Y′ finite over a normal projective modification X over A, and the Leray injection embeds H1(Y,OY) into H1(Y′,OY′).

3.1F7F8step 2.1

Normality of the target affine algebras makes the field trace of every integral element regular there, so the trace map Φ ⁣:π∗OY′→OXn, s↦(Tr⁡(bis)), is an injection of sheaves whose Gram matrix is the trace pairing; the adjugate shows that d annihilates the cokernel. The long exact sequence therefore bounds H1(Y′) modulo its d-torsion by H1(X)n, and the kernel contributions are killed by d.

4.1F1F2F3F6step 3.1∎

The uniform principal-torsion lemma over B bounds the d-torsion independently of Y′; the A-length of H1(X)n is at most n times the assumed bound, and for finite local B/A the A-length of a finite-length B-module is the residue-degree multiple of its B-length. Hence the bound is uniform over Y′, and general normal proper modifications are reduced to projective ones by domination and the Leray injection. The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are inherited from the cited suppliers.

Remarks

  • The trace pairing converts the degree-n extension into n copies of the base cohomology up to d-torsion, and the principal-torsion bound controls that torsion.
  • Finiteness of the local extension enters in the length comparison.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources