Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rationality propagates to birational local surface rings

Statement

Assume AC and DC. If a permitted normal local surface domain A is rational and A⊂B is a normal two-dimensional local domain with the same fraction field, essentially of finite type over A, then B is rational. If modification H1 over A is uniformly bounded, some finite normalized point-blowup sequence over A has rational local rings at every closed point of its terminal surface.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A rational permitted normal local surface domain A, a normal two-dimensional local domain A⊂B with the same fraction field essentially of finite type over A, and in the bounded part a uniform bound on modification H1 over A.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-dependent-choice. Let X be a set and let R⊆X×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when for every x∈X there is y∈X with xRy. The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)

[F3]

def-rational-normal-surface-singularity-and-bounded-modification-h1. Assume AC and DC. A normal two-dimensional Noetherian local domain A essentially of finite type over a field or complete equicharacteristic local base defines a rational singularity if H1(Y,OY)=0 for every normal integral proper modification Y→Spec⁡A. Bounded modification H1 means these modules have uniformly bounded A-length. (Rational normal surface singularities and bounded modification cohomology)

[F4]

lem-finite-over-projective-noetherian-affine-base-is-projective. Assume AC. Let R be Noetherian, let X be projective over R, and let Y→X be finite. Then Y→X admits a closed immersion into one relative projective space over X, and Y is projective over R. Finite compositions of projective morphisms between such schemes are projective. (Finite schemes over projective schemes are projective over a Noetherian affine base)

[F5]

lem-local-normal-surface-modification-dimension-and-projective-cohomology. Assume AC and DC. Let (A,m) be a normal Noetherian local domain of dimension two and f:X→Spec⁡A an integral modification. Then X has dimension two, all closed points have local dimension two, f is an isomorphism off the closed point, f∗OX=OSpec⁡A, and its special fibre has dimension at most one. (Dimension and cohomology of local normal surface modifications)

[F6]

lem-local-normalized-point-blowup-sequences-spread-at-closed-points. Assume AC and DC. Let X be a normal integral surface locally of finite type over a permitted base and x∈X a closed point with two-dimensional local ring B. Any finite normalized point-blowup sequence over Spec⁡B spreads to the same finite sequence of normalized blowups at closed points of X, unchanged off x. (Local normalized point sequences spread at closed surface points)

[F7]

lem-normal-surface-modification-leray-short-exact-sequence. Assume AC and DC. Let A be a normal local domain of dimension two in the field/complete-equicharacteristic finite-type class, and X′→gX→Spec⁡A normal integral modifications. Then g∗OX′=OX and H1(X,OX)→H1(X′,OX′) is injective. (The Leray sequence for normal surface modifications)

[F8]

lem-surface-finite-type-normalization-finite. Assume AC and DC. Every integral finite-type algebra over a field or a complete equicharacteristic Noetherian local base has finite normalization, and so do its localizations. Integral schemes of finite type over these bases consequently have finite scheme normalization. (Surface finite type normalization finite)

Proof

1.1F3F4F8given

Write B=Cq for a finite-type A-domain C in the common function field, take its affine projective closure and finite normalization: the result is a normal projective modification X of Spec⁡A containing the same normal local ring B at a point x, since normalization localizes to B and has exactly one point above q with unchanged local ring.

2.1F5F6step 1.1

The integral modification has dimension two by the dimension helper, and local dimension two forces x to be closed; to test rationality of B it suffices by normalized-point domination to test its normalized point sequences, and the spreading helper extends each such sequence over B to a sequence over X.

3.1F7F6step 2.1

Rationality of A makes H1(X′,O)=0 for the spread model X′; the Leray sequence identifies the relevant R1g∗O stalk at x with the tested H1 over B by localization, so that H1 vanishes and B is rational.

4.1F5F7step 2.1step 3.1

For the bounded statement choose a normal projective modification maximizing the integer H1-length, which exists because the set of values is a nonempty bounded set of natural numbers; dominating it by a normalized point sequence and using the Leray injection and maximality shows the terminal scheme still attains the maximum, and then every further normal projective modification of it has the same length, so the corresponding R1g∗O vanishes.

5.1F1F2F6step 4.1∎

Spreading the point sequences at every closed local ring as in step 2.1 and using localization exhibits zero H1 for all of them, so the point-sequence test proves those local rings rational; no general arbitrary-modification extension or limit theorem is imported. The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are inherited from the cited suppliers.

Remarks

  • The first half is the propagation of rationality along a birational local extension; the second is the analogous maximality argument for a uniform bound.
  • The projective closure and finite normalization is what makes the local ring B appear as the local ring at a closed point of a projective modification.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources