Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normality and fibre cohomology of a rational surface point blowup

Statement

Assume AC and DC. For a rational permitted normal local surface domain (A,m,κ), its ordinary point blowup X is normal. Its exceptional fibre E is a projective pure CM curve, its tautological conormal line L=OE(1) is very ample, and H1(E,Ln)=0, H0(E,Ln)=mn/mn+1 for n≥0. In particular H0(E,O)=κ and deg⁡κL=dim⁡κ(m/m2)−1, which is at least one and equals one only for regular A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A rational permitted normal local surface domain (A,m,κ), its ordinary point blowup X0, and the exceptional fibre E with tautological conormal line L=OE(1).

[F1]

cor-regular-quotient-cohen-macaulay-equivalence. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Under the hypotheses of lem-regular-quotient-preserves-depth-dimension-gap, M is Cohen--Macaulay if and only if M/xM is Cohen--Macaulay. (Cohen--Macaulayness and a regular parameter quotient)

[F2]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F3]

def-degree-invertible-sheaf-proper-dimension-one. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Euler-characteristic supplier below (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field (def-field) and let C be a proper k-scheme (def-proper-morphism) whose underlying topological space is Noetherian of dimension at most one (def-dimension-noetherian-topological-space, def-locally-noetherian-and-noetherian-scheme). (Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme)

[F4]

def-dependent-choice. Let X be a set and let R⊆X×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when for every x∈X there is y∈X with xRy. The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)

[F5]

def-embedding-dimension-and-regular-local-ring. For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring (R,m,k), define edim⁡R=dim⁡k(m/m2). The ring is regular local when edim⁡R=dim⁡R. The cotangent space is intrinsic, and is finite-dimensional because m is finitely generated. (embedding dimension and regular local ring)

[F6]

def-rational-normal-surface-singularity-and-bounded-modification-h1. Assume AC and DC. A normal two-dimensional Noetherian local domain A essentially of finite type over a field or complete equicharacteristic local base defines a rational singularity if H1(Y,OY)=0 for every normal integral proper modification Y→Spec⁡A. Bounded modification H1 means these modules have uniformly bounded A-length. (Rational normal surface singularities and bounded modification cohomology)

[F7]

lem-eventual-global-generation-coherent-twists. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let A be a Noetherian commutative ring (def-noetherian-ring-and-module) and let X be a scheme projective over A in the finite-dimensional H-projective convention (def-projective-morphism-pre-proj): the structure morphism X→Spec⁡A (def-affine-scheme-spectrum) factors over (Eventual generation of coherent projective twists)

[F8]

lem-finite-over-projective-noetherian-affine-base-is-projective. Assume AC. Let R be Noetherian, let X be projective over R, and let Y→X be finite. Then Y→X admits a closed immersion into one relative projective space over X, and Y is projective over R. Finite compositions of projective morphisms between such schemes are projective. (Finite schemes over projective schemes are projective over a Noetherian affine base)

[F9]

lem-normal-domain-implies-s-two. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Every commutative Noetherian integrally closed domain satisfies (S2). (normal domain implies s two)

[F10]

lem-rational-surface-exceptional-ideal-powers-and-sections. Assume AC and DC. Let A be a rational permitted normal local surface domain and X→Spec⁡A a normal projective modification. A coherent globally generated sheaf F on X has H1(X,F)=0. If the scheme-theoretic closed fibre is Cartier with ideal I=mOX, then H0(X,In)=mn and H1(X,In)=0 for all n≥0. (Powers and sections of a rational surface exceptional ideal)

[F11]

lem-surface-finite-type-normalization-finite. Assume AC and DC. Every integral finite-type algebra over a field or a complete equicharacteristic Noetherian local base has finite normalization, and so do its localizations. Integral schemes of finite type over these bases consequently have finite scheme normalization. (Surface finite type normalization finite)

[F12]

thm-pullback-center-ideal-invertible. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the relative Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let I be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type on a scheme X (def-quasi-coherent-ideal-sheaf), let π ⁣:Bl⁡IX→X be its blowup and let E=π−1(Z) be the exceptional subscheme, with the convention that O(1) (The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier)

[F13]

thm-serre-vanishing. Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the cited suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let A be a Noetherian commutative ring with 1, let X be a scheme projective over A in the finite-dimensional H-projective convention (def-projective-morphism-pre-proj): the structure morphism X→Spec⁡A factors as a closed immersion (Serre vanishing for coherent sheaves and ample twists)

Proof

1.1F9F10F12

Let ν ⁣:X→X0 be the finite normalization of the blowup. The point ideal pulls back to an invertible ideal I′=OX0(1) with pullback I on X, and the powers lemma gives H0(X,In)=mn; the natural injections mn→H0(X0,I′n)→H0(X,In) compose to the identity inclusion in the common function field, so both are equalities.

2.1F7F8F13step 1.1

If Q=ν∗OX/OX0 were nonzero, then Q(n) would be globally generated and nonzero for large n, hence have a nonzero global section; Serre vanishing makes H1(X0,I′n)=0 and the projection formula makes H0 of the middle term equal to mn, so the long exact sequence would give H0(Q(n))=0, a contradiction. Hence ν is an isomorphism and the blowup X0 is normal.

3.1F1F6step 2.1

Normal two-dimensional local rings are Cohen--Macaulay, and their quotients by nonzero nonzerodivisors are pure one-dimensional Cohen--Macaulay modules, so E is a projective pure Cohen--Macaulay curve.

4.1F3F5F10F13step 3.1

Applying the powers lemma to 0→In+1→In→OE(n)→0 with H1 of both powers and H2 of the kernel vanishing gives H1(E,Ln)=0 and H0(E,Ln)=mn/mn+1 for every n≥0; in particular H0(E,O)=κ, the blowup embedding makes L very ample, and the Euler-characteristic degree is μ−1 with μ=dim⁡κm/m2, which is at least one and equals one exactly when A is regular.

5.1F2F4step 4.1F11∎

The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are inherited from the normalization and vanishing suppliers; no smoothness of A is assumed.

Remarks

  • Normality of the blowup is proved by comparing the linear systems of the powers of the point ideal and its pullback.
  • The fibre cohomology is read off from the same powers sequence.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

96 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources