Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

No derived residue map into structure cohomology of a normal surface modification

Statement

Assume AC and DC. For A,X as in the preceding injection lemma, with residue field κ, Hom⁡D(A)(κ[−1],RΓ(X,OX))=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A normal two-dimensional Noetherian local domain A essentially of finite type over a field or complete equicharacteristic local base with residue field κ, and a projective normal modification X→Spec⁡A.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-dependent-choice. Let X be a set and let R⊆X×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when for every x∈X there is y∈X with xRy. The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)

[F3]

def-normal-surface-modification-and-normalized-point-blowup. Normal schemes. A locally Noetherian scheme is normal if every local ring OX,x is an integrally closed domain (def-normal-noetherian-ring). This is a local condition on the local rings and is checked on an affine open cover; it does not require the global section ring to be a domain. The empty scheme is normal vacuously. (Normal scheme modifications and normalized point blowups)

[F4]

lem-local-normal-surface-modification-dimension-and-projective-cohomology. Assume AC and DC. Let (A,m) be a normal Noetherian local domain of dimension two and f:X→Spec⁡A an integral modification. Then X has dimension two, all closed points have local dimension two, f is an isomorphism off the closed point, f∗OX=OSpec⁡A, and its special fibre has dimension at most one. (Dimension and cohomology of local normal surface modifications)

[F5]

lem-projective-normal-surface-modification-h1-injects-off-special-fibre. Assume AC and DC. Let A be a normal two-dimensional Noetherian local domain essentially of finite type over a field or complete equicharacteristic local base, and let X→Spec⁡A be a projective normal modification. If U is the inverse image of the punctured spectrum, H1(X,OX)→H1(U,OU) is injective. (H1 of a normal surface modification injects off its special fibre)

[F6]

lem-r-one-s-two-intersection-of-height-one-localisations. Assume the Axiom of Choice. If R is a commutative Noetherian domain satisfying (S2), then inside its fraction field K one has R=⋂ht⁡p=1Rp. For a field the empty intersection is interpreted as K=R. (r one s two intersection of height one localisations)

[F7]

lem-normal-domain-implies-s-two. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Every commutative Noetherian integrally closed domain satisfies (S2). (normal domain implies s two)

[F8]

thm-completion-of-a-noetherian-local-ring. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring, and let R^ be its m-adic completion. 1. R^ is a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal mR^. 2. The residue field is unchanged: R^/mR^≅R/m. 3. The completion map R→R^ is faithfully flat. (Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field)

Proof

1.1F4given

Let P be a degreewise finite free resolution of κ over A; sheafifying and applying global-section Hom adjunction termwise against a bounded-below injective resolution of OX identifies the asserted group with Hom⁡D(X)(K,OX), where K=Lf∗κ[−1]. Here Hi(K)=0 for i>1, H1(K)=OXs, and H0(K)=Tor⁡1A(OX,κ) is annihilated by m; higher Tor sheaves may occur in negative degrees.

2.1F4step 1.1

The negative truncation τ≤−1K and its shift by 1 have no maps to OX by the derived-category degree bounds. Thus the truncation triangle identifies Hom⁡(K,OX) with Hom⁡(τ≥0K,OX). The sheaf H0(K) has no maps to OX: a nonzero element of m annihilates it and is regular on the integral X. Also Hom⁡(H0(K)[1],OX)=0. The remaining truncation triangle therefore identifies the group with Ext⁡X1(OXs,OX). Regard a class as an extension 0→OX→E→OXs→0.

3.1F5step 2.1

Pulling the extension back along OX↠OXs gives an extension of OX by itself which is split off the special fibre; the preceding injection lemma forces it to split globally, so the element 1 of OXs lifts to a global section s of E.

4.1F6F7step 3.1

Multiplying s by the fibre ideal I gives a map I→OX; since global structure functions are A and global fibre-ideal functions are its maximal ideal, this induces m→A, which is multiplication by an element of the fraction field lying in every height-one localization and hence in A by the S2 intersection property. Subtracting that element makes the lift annihilated by I, producing a splitting OXs→E of the original extension.

5.1F1F2F3F8step 4.1∎

Hence every class in the group is zero, giving Hom⁡D(A)(κ[−1],RΓ(X,OX))=0; the extension correspondence used is the usual injective-resolution description, which needs only enough injectives, not projective module sheaves. The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are inherited from the cited suppliers.

Remarks

  • The geometric input is the splitting off the special fibre supplied by the H1-injection lemma.
  • The normalization of the trace uses S2 intersection, which is where normality of A enters.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources