Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Grauert–Riemenschneider vanishing for the required normal surface modifications

Statement

Assume AC and DC. Let R be regular Noetherian local of dimension two, A a finite normal local R-domain of dimension two with R↪A local, and X→Spec⁡A a projective normal modification, in the permitted finite-type/completion class. For its normalized dualizing module ωX over ωA=Hom⁡R(A,R), H1(X,ωX)=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A regular Noetherian local ring R of dimension two, a finite normal local R-domain A of dimension two with R↪A local, a projective normal modification X→Spec⁡A in the permitted class, and ωA=Hom⁡R(A,R) with normalized dualizing module ωX.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-dependent-choice. Let X be a set and let R⊆X×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when for every x∈X there is y∈X with xRy. The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)

[F3]

def-normal-surface-modification-and-normalized-point-blowup. Normal schemes. A locally Noetherian scheme is normal if every local ring OX,x is an integrally closed domain (def-normal-noetherian-ring). This is a local condition on the local rings and is checked on an affine open cover; it does not require the global section ring to be a domain. The empty scheme is normal vacuously. (Normal scheme modifications and normalized point blowups)

[F4]

lem-local-normal-surface-modification-dimension-and-projective-cohomology. Assume AC and DC. Let (A,m) be a normal Noetherian local domain of dimension two and f:X→Spec⁡A an integral modification. Then X has dimension two, all closed points have local dimension two, f is an isomorphism off the closed point, f∗OX=OSpec⁡A, and its special fibre has dimension at most one. (Dimension and cohomology of local normal surface modifications)

[F5]

lem-normal-surface-modification-no-derived-residue-map. Assume AC and DC. For A,X as in the preceding injection lemma, with residue field κ, Hom⁡D(A)(κ[−1],RΓ(X,OX))=0. (No derived residue map into structure cohomology of a normal surface modification)

[F6]

lem-normal-projective-surface-dualizing-module-over-regular-local-base. Assume AC and DC. Let R be a regular Noetherian local ring of dimension two, let A be a finite normal local R-domain of dimension two, with R↪A local, and let X be a normal integral scheme of dimension two projective over R, with a proper birational map f:X→Spec⁡A. Put ωA=Hom⁡R(A,R). (Dualizing modules and trace pairing for normal projective surface modifications)

[F7]

lem-finite-length-duality-over-a-regular-local-base. Assume AC and DC. Let (R,m) be regular Noetherian local of dimension d and let (B,n) be a module-finite local R-algebra with the map local. For finite-length B-modules put T(M)=Ext⁡Rd(M,R) with its natural B-action. (Finite-length duality over a regular local base)

[F8]

lem-finite-regular-base-algebra-dualizing-biduality. Assume AC and DC. Let R be a regular Noetherian ring of finite dimension d, and let B≠0 be a module-finite R-algebra. For any integer s, DB=RHom⁡R(B,R[s]) is a dualizing complex over B. (Dualizing biduality for finite algebras over a regular base)

[F9]

thm-proper-pushforward-coherent. Assume the Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice, inherited from the affine localization theorem, the Čech comparison and the dévissage lemma cited below (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain). (Coherent higher direct images under proper morphisms)

[F10]

Finite schemes over a projective scheme with Noetherian affine base are projective, and finite compositions of these projective morphisms are projective. (Finite schemes over projective schemes are projective over a Noetherian affine base)

Proof

1.1F3F4F6F9F10given

The finite map Spec⁡A→Spec⁡R is projective by [F10], applied with Spec⁡R=PR0. Composing with the projective map X→Spec⁡A makes X projective over R, so [F6] applies to the specified injective local regular base and two-dimensional A. The dimension and cohomology helper gives that X has no cohomology of the dualizing module above degree one, and proper coherence together with the isomorphism off the closed point makes H1(X,ωX) a finite-length A-module.

2.1F4step 1.1

If that module were nonzero, Nakayama and a residue-field functional would give a nonzero map α ⁣:RΓ(X,ωX[2])→κ[1].

3.1F6F7F8step 2.1

Finite-base coherent biduality makes derived dualization with DA=ωA[2] faithful on bounded finite complexes; finite-length duality takes the simple residue module to a simple module with the same annihilator, hence to κ up to isomorphism, and projective surface duality with homothety identifies the dual of RΓ(X,ωX[2]) with RΓ(X,OX).

4.1F1F2F5step 3.1∎

The dual of α is therefore a nonzero map κ[−1]→RΓ(X,OX), contradicting the derived-residue-map lemma; hence H1(X,ωX)=0, with every duality arrow the actual evaluation and trace pairing over the regular subring. The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are inherited from the cited suppliers.

Remarks

  • The proof is a duality argument: a nonzero H1 would dualize to a forbidden derived map from the residue module into structure cohomology.
  • No general proper duality theorem is cited in place of its proof.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

98 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources