Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The number of contracted curves drops by one after factoring through a point blowup

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k, X, Y and f ⁣:X→Y be as in A birational morphism of regular surfaces factors through the blowup of a point where its inverse is undefined, and let N(f) be the number of integral curves of X contracted by f, a nonnegative integer by Fibres of a proper birational morphism of regular surfaces. Let y∈Y be a closed point such that f factors through the blowup b ⁣:Y′=Bl⁡yY→Y, say f=b∘g with g ⁣:X→Y′ the factorization of the previous lemma. Then g is again a birational morphism of integral regular proper surfaces over k, and N(g)=N(f)−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, integral regular finite-type proper k-schemes X,Y of pure dimension two, a birational morphism f ⁣:X→Y, a closed point y∈Y such that f factors as f=b∘g through the blowup b ⁣:Y′=Bl⁡yY→Y, and the finite number N(f) of integral curves of X contracted by f.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-finite-morphism-schemes. A morphism of schemes f:X→S is finite if, for every affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆S, its inverse image is affine, f−1(U)=Spec⁡B, and the induced A-algebra B is module-finite over A in the sense of def-finite-type-and-module-finite-algebras. The affineness language agrees with def-affine-morphism-schemes. (Finite morphisms of schemes)

[F3]

def-proper-morphism. A morphism of schemes f:X→S is proper if and only if it is separated, of finite type, and universally closed. Here separatedness has the meaning of def-separated-morphism-schemes, finite type has the meaning of def-locally-finite-type-and-finite-type-morphism, and universally closed has the meaning of def-universally-closed-morphism. (Proper morphisms)

[F4]

def-quasi-finite-morphism-schemes. A morphism of schemes f:X→S is quasi-finite if it is of finite type (def-locally-finite-type-and-finite-type-morphism) and, for every point x∈X, there are affine neighbourhoods U=Spec⁡(B) of x and V=Spec⁡(A) of f(x) such that f(U)⊆V and the induced finite-type ring map A→B is quasi-finite at the prime (Quasi-finite morphisms of schemes)

[F5]

lem-birational-surface-morphism-factors-through-blowup-at-a-non-isomorphism-point. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let X and Y be integral regular finite-type k-schemes of pure dimension two that are proper over k, and let f ⁣:X→Y be a birational morphism. (A birational morphism of regular surfaces factors through the blowup of a point where its inverse is undefined)

[F6]

lem-blowing-up-a-regular-point-is-a-contraction. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let S be an integral regular finite-type k-scheme of pure dimension two, let p∈S be a closed point, let π ⁣:S′=Bl⁡pS→S be the blowup of S at p and let E=π−1(p) be its exceptional curve. (Blowing up a regular point is a contraction)

[F7]

lem-fibre-components-of-a-proper-birational-morphism-of-regular-surfaces. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let X and Y be integral regular finite-type k-schemes of pure dimension two, let f ⁣:X→Y be a proper birational morphism and let y∈Y be a closed point. Put F=f−1(y). Then: 1. F is a proper κ(y)-scheme with dim⁡F≤1. 2. (Fibres of a proper birational morphism of regular surfaces)

[F8]

lem-finite-birational-to-normal-is-isomorphism. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let f ⁣:Y→X be a finite birational morphism of irreducible classical varieties over an algebraically closed field. If X is normal, then f is an isomorphism. The normality of the target is essential: the normalization of the cusp is finite and birational but not an isomorphism. (A finite birational morphism onto a normal variety is an isomorphism)

[F9]

thm-proper-quasi-finite-is-finite. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every proper quasi-finite morphism of schemes f:X→S is finite (Proper morphisms, Quasi-finite morphisms of schemes, Finite morphisms of schemes). No Noetherian or nonemptiness hypothesis is imposed, and the assertion is local on the base. (A proper quasi-finite morphism is finite)

[F10]

A proper birational morphism of integral Noetherian schemes with normal two-dimensional target is an isomorphism over every codimension-one point. (A normal-surface modification is an isomorphism in codimension one)

Proof

1.1F2F3F5F6given

The factorization g is again a proper birational morphism of integral regular finite-type k-surfaces, and the exceptional curve E of b is an integral curve over κ(y); this is the point-blowup dictionary of the contraction lemma.

2.1F4F7F9F10step 1.1

Exactly one irreducible component C0 of f−1(y) dominates E: the codimension-one isomorphism argument for a proper birational morphism with normal target shows that the fibre over the generic point of E is a single point, so at most one component dominates E, and surjectivity of g forces exactly one.

3.1F7F8step 2.1

Every other one-dimensional component of a fibre of f over y lies in a fibre of g over a point of E, and every contracted curve of g is a contracted curve of f different from C0; conversely a contracted curve of f is either C0 or is contracted by g, because b is an isomorphism off y. Hence the two sets of contracted curves differ by C0 alone.

4.1F1step 3.1∎

Therefore N(g)=N(f)−1, as claimed; the Axiom of Choice is inherited from the cited factorization and blowup suppliers.

Remarks

  • The count drop is exactly one at each blowup of a point where the inverse map is undefined.
  • The argument uses only the component structure of the fibre and the birationality of g, not any classification of the exceptional curve.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources