Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Blowing up a regular point is a contraction

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let S be an integral regular finite-type k-scheme of pure dimension two, let p∈S be a closed point, let π ⁣:S′=Bl⁡pS→S be the blowup of S at p and let E=π−1(p) be its exceptional curve. Then S′ is an integral regular finite-type k-scheme of pure dimension two, E is an exceptional curve of the first kind on S′ (Exceptional curves of the first kind and their contractions), and π is a contraction of E. Moreover π restricts to an isomorphism S′∖E→S∖{p}.

Conversely, if b ⁣:X→X′ is a contraction of an exceptional curve of the first kind, then b is, up to unique isomorphism over X, the blowing up of a closed point of X′ with regular two-dimensional local ring.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, an integral regular finite-type k-scheme S of pure dimension two, a closed point p∈S, the blowup π ⁣:S′=Bl⁡pS→S and the fibre E=π−1(p).

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-blowup-scheme-along-ideal. Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the relative Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a scheme and let I⊆OX be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type (def-quasi-coherent-ideal-sheaf), with zero scheme Z=V(I), the closed subscheme of X cut out by I. (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf)

[F3]

def-exceptional-curve-and-contraction. Assume the Axiom of Choice where it is inherited from the degree and intersection suppliers below (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a Noetherian scheme. (a) Exceptional curves of the first kind. A closed subscheme E⊆X (def-closed-immersion-schemes) is an exceptional curve of the first kind if: 1. (Exceptional curves of the first kind and their contractions)

[F4]

def-integral-scheme. An integral scheme is a nonempty scheme that is reduced and whose underlying topological space is irreducible. Equivalently, it is nonempty and every nonempty affine open is the spectrum of a domain. The latter criterion is independent of the chosen affine open cover. (Integral schemes)

[F5]

thm-blowup-regular-surface-closed-point-regular. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let S be a regular finite-type k-scheme of pure dimension two, let p be a closed point, put κ=κ(p) and r=[κ:k], and let π ⁣:S′=Bl⁡pS→S be the blowup of S at p with exceptional subscheme E. (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field)

[F6]

cor-blowup-birational-integral-scheme. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the blowup construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be an integral scheme (Integral schemes) and let I be a nonzero quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type. (Blowing up a nonzero ideal on an integral scheme is birational)

[F7]

lem-exceptional-curve-normal-bundle-minus-one. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let p be a closed point of a regular surface S over a field k, assume dim⁡OS,p=2, and let π ⁣:S′→S be the blowup of p and E its exceptional curve. (The normal bundle of the exceptional curve is O(-1))

[F8]

thm-pullback-center-ideal-invertible. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the relative Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let I be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type on a scheme X (def-quasi-coherent-ideal-sheaf), let π ⁣:Bl⁡IX→X be its blowup and let E=π−1(Z) be the exceptional subscheme, with the convention that O(1) (The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier)

[F9]

lem-blowup-isomorphism-off-center. Let I be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type with zero scheme Z and let π ⁣:Bl⁡IX→X be the blowup. (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center)

Proof

1.1F4F5F6F9given

The blowup S′ is integral of pure dimension two and regular, by the regularity of the blowup of a regular surface at a closed point together with the birational integrality of blowups; the structural map π is proper and is an isomorphism off the centre p.

2.1F7F8givenstep 1.1

The fibre E=π−1(p) is an effective Cartier divisor: it is cut out by the pullback of the maximal ideal of p, which is invertible because the pullback of the centre ideal of a blowup is invertible, and it is isomorphic to Pκ(p)1 with normal bundle O(−1) by the computation for the blowup of a regular surface at a closed point.

3.1F2F3F9step 1.1step 2.1

By steps 1.1 and 2.1 the curve E is an exceptional curve of the first kind on S′, and π is the blowup of S at the closed point p whose local ring is regular of dimension two; hence π is a contraction of E in the sense of the definition, and it restricts to an isomorphism S′∖E→S∖{p}.

4.1F2F3givenstep 3.1

Conversely, if b ⁣:X→X′ is a contraction of an exceptional curve of the first kind, then by definition b is the blowup of X′ at a closed point x′ with regular two-dimensional local ring, with E identified with the scheme-theoretic exceptional fibre; this is exactly the statement that b is, up to unique isomorphism over X, the blowing up of a closed point of X′.

5.1F1step 3.1step 4.1∎

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the blowup suppliers; no further choice enters.

Remarks

  • The two halves of the statement are the definition of contraction read in the two directions; the mathematical content is the regularity and normal-bundle computation for a point blowup.
  • Purity of dimension two is preserved by the blowup, which is why the exceptional curve is a divisor rather than a higher-codimensional fibre.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources