Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Universal property and uniqueness of a contraction

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the blowup suppliers. Let X be a Noetherian scheme, E⊆X an exceptional curve of the first kind and b ⁣:X→X′ a contraction of E (Exceptional curves of the first kind and their contractions). Write x′=b(E)∈X′. Then:

  1. b is proper, surjective and closed; b ⁣:X→X′ is a topological quotient map identifying X′ with the quotient of X obtained by collapsing E to x′; the canonical map OX′→b∗OX is an isomorphism and R1b∗OX=0.
  2. (Universal property) For every morphism φ ⁣:X→Y of schemes with φ(E) a single point there is a unique morphism φ′ ⁣:X′→Y with φ=φ′∘b.
  3. (Uniqueness) If bi ⁣:X→Xi′, i=1,2, are contractions of E, there is a unique isomorphism X1′→X2′ compatible with b1 and b2.

Consequently a contraction of E, when it exists, is unique and is characterized by the universal property.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Noetherian scheme X, an exceptional curve of the first kind E⊆X, a contraction b ⁣:X→X′ of E, and a morphism φ ⁣:X→Y collapsing E to a point.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-exceptional-curve-and-contraction. Assume the Axiom of Choice where it is inherited from the degree and intersection suppliers below (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a Noetherian scheme. (a) Exceptional curves of the first kind. A closed subscheme E⊆X (def-closed-immersion-schemes) is an exceptional curve of the first kind if: 1. (Exceptional curves of the first kind and their contractions)

[F3]

def-proper-morphism. A morphism of schemes f:X→S is proper if and only if it is separated, of finite type, and universally closed. Here separatedness has the meaning of def-separated-morphism-schemes, finite type has the meaning of def-locally-finite-type-and-finite-type-morphism, and universally closed has the meaning of def-universally-closed-morphism. (Proper morphisms)

[F4]

thm-blowup-projective. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the relative Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a scheme, let I be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type on X (def-quasi-coherent-ideal-sheaf) and let π ⁣:Bl⁡IX→X be the blowup of def-blowup-scheme-along-ideal. Then: 1. (Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper)

[F5]

lem-blowup-isomorphism-off-center. Let I be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type with zero scheme Z and let π ⁣:Bl⁡IX→X be the blowup. (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center)

[F6]

lem-blowup-point-pushforward-vanishing. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let S be a regular surface over a field k (more generally a locally Noetherian scheme of dimension two whose local rings at the center are regular of dimension two) and let p be a closed point with residue field κ(p). Let π ⁣:S′→S be the blowup of p with exceptional curve E. (Pushforward and vanishing for point blowups on a surface)

[F7]

thm-proper-morphism-closed-image. Let f:X→S be a proper morphism of schemes. Then f is a closed map of topological spaces: for every closed subset Z⊆∣X∣ its image f(Z) is closed in ∣S∣. In particular f(X) is closed. (Proper morphisms are closed)

[F8]

cor-blowup-unique-up-to-unique-isomorphism. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let I be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type with zero scheme Z. If π′ ⁣:Y→X is an X-scheme such that (π′)−1(Z) is an effective Cartier divisor and Y carries the universal property of Bl⁡IX (every X-scheme in which the inverse image of Z is an effective Cartier divisor maps un (Uniqueness of the blowup)

Proof

1.1F2F3F4F5F7given

By definition b is the blowup of X′ at the closed point x′=b(E) with regular two-dimensional local ring, so b is proper and an isomorphism off the centre; its image contains that complement and the nonempty exceptional fibre over x′, so b is surjective. Properness makes it closed.

2.1F6F7step 1.1

A continuous closed surjection is a quotient map, so b identifies X′ with the quotient of X obtained by collapsing E to x′ set-theoretically and topologically; moreover for a point blowup the natural map OX′→b∗OX is an isomorphism and R1b∗OX=0.

3.1F3F7step 2.1

Since φ collapses E to a point and b is injective off E, the map φ is constant on the fibres of b; by the quotient property of step 2.1 it factors uniquely as a continuous map φ′ ⁣:X′→Y with φ=φ′∘b.

4.1F5F6step 2.1step 3.1

For the morphism structure, the map of sheaves φ♯ ⁣:φ−1OY→OX is adjoint to a map (φ′)−1OY→b∗OX along the quotient, and b∗OX=OX′ by step 2.1, so it gives a map of sheaves of rings (φ′)−1OY→OX′; locality is checked at x′: a germ vanishing at φ(E)=φ′(x′) pulls back under φ to a function vanishing on E, hence its image in (b∗OX)x′=OX′,x′ lies in the maximal ideal. Thus φ′ is a morphism of schemes with φ=φ′∘b, unique because b is a quotient map.

5.1F2F8step 4.1

For uniqueness of the contraction, apply the universal property to the two contractions b1,b2 of E: each bi collapses E, so b2 factors uniquely through b1 and vice versa, and the two factorizations are mutually inverse isomorphisms X1′→X2′ compatible with the maps from X.

6.1F1F8step 5.1∎

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the blowup suppliers; the only uniqueness statement used is the universal property of the blowup up to unique isomorphism.

Remarks

  • The key sheaf input is b∗OX=OX′ for a point blowup, which makes the adjunction computation of step 2.2 an honest map of structure sheaves.
  • Uniqueness of the contraction follows formally from the universal property and does not use any classification of exceptional curves.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources