How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Universal property and uniqueness of a contraction
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the blowup suppliers. Let be a Noetherian scheme, an exceptional curve of the first kind and a contraction of (Exceptional curves of the first kind and their contractions). Write . Then:
- is proper, surjective and closed; is a topological quotient map identifying with the quotient of obtained by collapsing to ; the canonical map is an isomorphism and .
- (Universal property) For every morphism of schemes with a single point there is a unique morphism with .
- (Uniqueness) If , , are contractions of , there is a unique isomorphism compatible with and .
Consequently a contraction of , when it exists, is unique and is characterized by the universal property.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian scheme , an exceptional curve of the first kind , a contraction of , and a morphism collapsing to a point.
def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function with domain satisfying for all . (The Axiom of Choice)
def-exceptional-curve-and-contraction. Assume the Axiom of Choice where it is inherited from the degree and intersection suppliers below (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a Noetherian scheme. (a) Exceptional curves of the first kind. A closed subscheme (def-closed-immersion-schemes) is an exceptional curve of the first kind if: 1. (Exceptional curves of the first kind and their contractions)
def-proper-morphism. A morphism of schemes is proper if and only if it is separated, of finite type, and universally closed. Here separatedness has the meaning of def-separated-morphism-schemes, finite type has the meaning of def-locally-finite-type-and-finite-type-morphism, and universally closed has the meaning of def-universally-closed-morphism. (Proper morphisms)
thm-blowup-projective. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the relative Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a scheme, let be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type on (def-quasi-coherent-ideal-sheaf) and let be the blowup of def-blowup-scheme-along-ideal. Then: 1. (Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper)
lem-blowup-isomorphism-off-center. Let be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type with zero scheme and let be the blowup. (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center)
lem-blowup-point-pushforward-vanishing. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a regular surface over a field (more generally a locally Noetherian scheme of dimension two whose local rings at the center are regular of dimension two) and let be a closed point with residue field . Let be the blowup of with exceptional curve . (Pushforward and vanishing for point blowups on a surface)
thm-proper-morphism-closed-image. Let be a proper morphism of schemes. Then is a closed map of topological spaces: for every closed subset its image is closed in . In particular is closed. (Proper morphisms are closed)
cor-blowup-unique-up-to-unique-isomorphism. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type with zero scheme . If is an -scheme such that is an effective Cartier divisor and carries the universal property of (every -scheme in which the inverse image of is an effective Cartier divisor maps un (Uniqueness of the blowup)
Proof
By definition is the blowup of at the closed point with regular two-dimensional local ring, so is proper and an isomorphism off the centre; its image contains that complement and the nonempty exceptional fibre over , so is surjective. Properness makes it closed.
A continuous closed surjection is a quotient map, so identifies with the quotient of obtained by collapsing to set-theoretically and topologically; moreover for a point blowup the natural map is an isomorphism and .
Since collapses to a point and is injective off , the map is constant on the fibres of ; by the quotient property of step 2.1 it factors uniquely as a continuous map with .
For the morphism structure, the map of sheaves is adjoint to a map along the quotient, and by step 2.1, so it gives a map of sheaves of rings ; locality is checked at : a germ vanishing at pulls back under to a function vanishing on , hence its image in lies in the maximal ideal. Thus is a morphism of schemes with , unique because is a quotient map.
For uniqueness of the contraction, apply the universal property to the two contractions of : each collapses , so factors uniquely through and vice versa, and the two factorizations are mutually inverse isomorphisms compatible with the maps from .
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the blowup suppliers; the only uniqueness statement used is the universal property of the blowup up to unique isomorphism.
Remarks
- The key sheaf input is for a point blowup, which makes the adjunction computation of step 2.2 an honest map of structure sheaves.
- Uniqueness of the contraction follows formally from the universal property and does not use any classification of exceptional curves.
Depends on
- Uniqueness of the blowup
- The Axiom of Choice
- Exceptional curves of the first kind and their contractions
- Proper morphisms
- The blowup is an isomorphism off the center
- Pushforward and vanishing for point blowups on a surface
- Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper
- Proper morphisms are closed
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Section 54.16 (Contracting exceptional curves) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Lemma 54.3.1 (Blowing up a regular surface at a point) (standard reference, not scraped)