How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A fixed-coordinate point-blowup chain defines a formal arc
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain). Let be an equicharacteristic Noetherian local domain, and let , , be the local rings at a successive infinite chain of point blowups, , all with residue field : for every the ring is the local ring at a point of the blowup of the closed point, the structural maps are local, and , compatibly with the specified residue-field maps. Suppose that one element generates the pullback of every centre ideal on the next local ring:
Then there is a nonsingular formal arc , extended from a surjection , whose point-blowup centres are the given ones. Here is a complete discrete valuation ring with residue field and uniformizer the image of ; no chosen coefficient-field identification is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An equicharacteristic Noetherian local domain , the chain of local rings of successive point blowups with all residue fields , and with for every .
Standard charts of an affine blowup. The blowup of along is covered by the affine charts , so the local rings of a blowup are localizations of these chart rings; different generating families give the same blowup. (Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps)
Universal property of the blowup. If is an -scheme and is an effective Cartier divisor on , where is the zero scheme of the blown-up ideal, then factors uniquely through . (Universal property of the blowup)
Completions of Noetherian local rings. The -adic completion of a Noetherian local ring is a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal , the same residue field, and the completion map is faithfully flat. (Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field)
Dimension one regular equals DVR. A nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension one is regular if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring. (one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs)
The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are assumed; they also supply the successive choices of residue lifts in step 8.1. (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)
Proof
The directed union. By [F1], each is a localization of a chart for a nonzero . Such a chart is a subring of , so its localization is a domain containing and with the same fraction field. Thus all embed compatibly in , and locality gives . The union is a local domain with maximal ideal : this union is a proper ideal, and every element outside it is already a unit in a ring . The compatible residue-field identifications give . Moreover , since blowing up the zero ideal has no points by [F1]; injectivity and therefore imply .
The maximal ideal is generated by . For the hypothesis gives , hence . Since extending each to stays inside , their union is still , and consequently . The element is a nonzero nonunit in the domain .
Successive quotients. For , cancellation in identifies with by multiplication by . In particular , since otherwise cancellation would make a unit. Thus has a filtration of length whose factors are ; it is a local Artinian ring for every .
The inverse limit. Put , with projections . Each is surjective: a representative of any prescribed class gives the compatible system of its residues. This alone does not identify the kernel; that identification follows from regularity of in .
Compatible division and kernels. Fix . Multiplication by identifies with for every , by cancellation in . If , then lies in ; its unique quotient by defines . These quotients are compatible, so they define with . Conversely , proving . Multiplication by is also injective on : if , the component at says , whose reduction gives for every . Thus division in is unique whenever it is defined, without having assumed that is a domain.
Completeness and locality. Steps 4.1 and 5.1 give for every , so is -adically complete and . Also , making a proper ideal. If , choose a unit lifting its nonzero residue; its image in is a unit, and with . The series converges in and inverts . Thus every element outside is a unit, and is local with maximal ideal and residue field .
Orders and the domain property. For , separatedness gives a largest with . Write ; maximality makes , hence a unit. For two such elements, regularity of powers of proved in step 5.1 shows that their product is nonzero and has order the sum of their orders: any further divisibility by would, after cancellation, put a product of units in . Therefore is a domain.
A complete DVR. Every nonzero ideal has an element of least order . Writing it as with a unit shows that , and all other elements have order at least , so . Hence every ideal is principal and is Noetherian. Its only prime ideals are and : powers with are not prime. Thus has dimension one, and its maximal ideal is generated by , so it is regular and is a DVR by [F4]. Completeness and its residue field were established in step 6.1.
The arc and its centres. The maps are local and induce the given residue-field identifications. Since , one has . The map is therefore a formal arc, nonsingular because the image of generates . For every , the pullback of the closed-point ideal of is the effective Cartier divisor cut out by . The universal property [F2] gives a unique factorization through its blowup. The given local map , viewed through its chart in [F1], gives such a factorization; locality places its closed point at the prescribed centre. Uniqueness therefore identifies the successive centres of the arc with the given chain.
Completion and surjectivity. Since , there are compatible maps . Passing to inverse limits extends uniquely to , using [F3] and step 6.1. Given , set and successively choose with residue equal to that of , then define . Existence and uniqueness of this division follow from step 5.1; [F5] supplies the sequence of residue lifts. The partial sums satisfy in . They are also Cauchy in for its -adic topology, since whenever , as . Hence they define an element of whose image agrees with modulo every , and separatedness gives equality. Thus is surjective, without a coefficient-field choice.
Remarks
- The equicharacteristic hypothesis on enters through the standing setup of this page; the construction of uses only that is a domain, so that the successive quotients are copies of and division by is unique.
- No coefficient field of is chosen: the residue-field identification is transported along the local maps , and the surjectivity of uses only residue lifts in .
- The hypothesis that generates every pullback centre ideal is exactly what forces ; without it the union need not have a principal maximal ideal and the argument does not apply.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps
- Universal property of the blowup
- Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field
- one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Lemma 54.10.1 (tag 0BG2) (standard reference, not scraped)