Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A fixed-coordinate point-blowup chain defines a formal arc

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain). Let (B,m,κ) be an equicharacteristic Noetherian local domain, and let (Bn,mn), n≥0, be the local rings at a successive infinite chain of point blowups, B0=B, all with residue field κ: for every n the ring Bn+1 is the local ring at a point of the blowup Bl⁡mn(Bn) of the closed point, the structural maps Bn→Bn+1 are local, and Bn+1/mn+1=κ, compatibly with the specified residue-field maps. Suppose that one element t∈m generates the pullback of every centre ideal on the next local ring:

mnBn+1=tBn+1(n≥0).

Then there is a nonsingular formal arc B→V, extended from a surjection B^→V, whose point-blowup centres are the given ones. Here V is a complete discrete valuation ring with residue field κ and uniformizer the image of t; no chosen coefficient-field identification is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An equicharacteristic Noetherian local domain (B,m,κ), the chain of local rings (Bn,mn) of successive point blowups with all residue fields κ, and t∈m with mnBn+1=tBn+1 for every n.

[F1]

Standard charts of an affine blowup. The blowup of Spec⁡A along I=(f0,…,fr) is covered by the affine charts Spec⁡A[I/fi], so the local rings of a blowup are localizations of these chart rings; different generating families give the same blowup. (Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps)

[F2]

Universal property of the blowup. If f ⁣:Y→X is an X-scheme and f−1(Z) is an effective Cartier divisor on Y, where Z is the zero scheme of the blown-up ideal, then f factors uniquely through Bl⁡ZX→X. (Universal property of the blowup)

[F3]

Completions of Noetherian local rings. The m-adic completion R^ of a Noetherian local ring is a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal mR^, the same residue field, and the completion map is faithfully flat. (Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field)

[F4]

Dimension one regular equals DVR. A nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension one is regular if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring. (one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs)

[F5]

The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are assumed; they also supply the successive choices of residue lifts in step 8.1. (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

The directed union. By [F1], each Bn+1 is a localization of a chart Bn[mn/f] for a nonzero f∈mn. Such a chart is a subring of Frac⁡(Bn), so its localization is a domain containing Bn and with the same fraction field. Thus all Bn embed compatibly in Frac⁡(B), and locality gives mn+1∩Bn=mn. The union U=⋃nBn is a local domain with maximal ideal n=⋃nmn: this union is a proper ideal, and every element outside it is already a unit in a ring Bn. The compatible residue-field identifications give U/n=κ. Moreover m≠0, since blowing up the zero ideal has no points by [F1]; injectivity and mB1=tB1 therefore imply t≠0.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

The maximal ideal is generated by t. For k>n the hypothesis gives mnBk=tBk, hence mnU=tU. Since extending each mn to U stays inside n, their union is still n, and consequently n=tU. The element t is a nonzero nonunit in the domain U.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Successive quotients. For j≥0, cancellation in U identifies U/tU with tjU/tj+1U by multiplication by tj. In particular tj∉tj+1U, since otherwise cancellation would make t a unit. Thus U/tNU has a filtration of length N whose factors are κ; it is a local Artinian ring for every N≥1.

4.1step 3.1construct

The inverse limit. Put V=lim←⁡j≥1U/tjU, with projections πN:V→U/tNU. Each πN is surjective: a representative u∈U of any prescribed class gives the compatible system of its residues. This alone does not identify the kernel; that identification follows from regularity of t in U.

5.1step 2.1step 4.1algebra

Compatible division and kernels. Fix N≥1. Multiplication by tN identifies U/tjU with tNU/tN+jU for every j≥1, by cancellation in U. If v=(vj)j∈ker⁡πN, then vN+j lies in tNU/tN+jU; its unique quotient by tN defines wj∈U/tjU. These quotients are compatible, so they define w∈V with tNw=v. Conversely tNV⊆ker⁡πN, proving ker⁡πN=tNV. Multiplication by tN is also injective on V: if tNw=0, the component at N+j says wN+j∈tjU/tN+jU, whose reduction gives wj=0 for every j. Thus division in V is unique whenever it is defined, without having assumed that V is a domain.

6.1step 1.1step 4.1step 5.1algebra

Completeness and locality. Steps 4.1 and 5.1 give V/tNV≅U/tNU for every N, so V≅lim←⁡NV/tNV is t-adically complete and ⋂NtNV=⋂Nker⁡πN=0. Also V/tV=κ, making tV a proper ideal. If v∉tV, choose a unit u∈U lifting its nonzero residue; its image in V is a unit, and v=u(1+ε) with ε∈tV. The series ∑j≥0(−ε)j converges in V and inverts 1+ε. Thus every element outside tV is a unit, and V is local with maximal ideal tV and residue field κ.

7.1step 5.1step 6.1algebra

Orders and the domain property. For 0≠v∈V, separatedness gives a largest N≥0 with v∈tNV. Write v=tNu; maximality makes u∉tV, hence a unit. For two such elements, regularity of powers of t proved in step 5.1 shows that their product is nonzero and has order the sum of their orders: any further divisibility by t would, after cancellation, put a product of units in tV. Therefore V is a domain.

8.1F4step 6.1step 7.1algebra

A complete DVR. Every nonzero ideal J⊆V has an element of least order N. Writing it as tNu with u a unit shows that tN∈J, and all other elements have order at least N, so J=(tN). Hence every ideal is principal and V is Noetherian. Its only prime ideals are 0 and tV: powers (tN) with N>1 are not prime. Thus V has dimension one, and its maximal ideal is generated by t, so it is regular and is a DVR by [F4]. Completeness and its residue field were established in step 6.1.

9.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 6.1step 8.1

The arc and its centres. The maps Bn→U→V are local and induce the given residue-field identifications. Since mnU=tU, one has mnV=tV. The map B→V is therefore a formal arc, nonsingular because the image of t∈m generates tV/t2V. For every n, the pullback of the closed-point ideal of Spec⁡Bn is the effective Cartier divisor cut out by t. The universal property [F2] gives a unique factorization through its blowup. The given local map Bn+1→V, viewed through its chart in [F1], gives such a factorization; locality places its closed point at the prescribed centre. Uniqueness therefore identifies the successive centres of the arc with the given chain.

10.1F3F5step 5.1step 6.1step 8.1algebra∎

Completion and surjectivity. Since mV=tV, there are compatible maps B/mN→V/tNV. Passing to inverse limits extends B→V uniquely to B^→V, using [F3] and step 6.1. Given v∈V, set r0=v and successively choose ci∈B with residue equal to that of ri, then define ri+1=(ri−ci)/t. Existence and uniqueness of this division follow from step 5.1; [F5] supplies the sequence of residue lifts. The partial sums sN=∑i<Nciti satisfy v−sN=tNrN in V. They are also Cauchy in B for its m-adic topology, since sM−sN∈mN whenever M≥N, as t∈m. Hence they define an element of B^ whose image agrees with v modulo every tNV, and separatedness gives equality. Thus B^→V is surjective, without a coefficient-field choice.

Remarks

  • The equicharacteristic hypothesis on B enters through the standing setup of this page; the construction of V uses only that U is a domain, so that the successive quotients tjU/tj+1U are copies of κ and division by t is unique.
  • No coefficient field of V is chosen: the residue-field identification is transported along the local maps Bn→V, and the surjectivity of B^→V uses only residue lifts in B.
  • The hypothesis that t generates every pullback centre ideal is exactly what forces n=tU; without it the union U need not have a principal maximal ideal and the argument does not apply.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources