How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exceptional curves of the first kind and their contractions
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice where it is inherited from the degree and intersection suppliers below (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a Noetherian scheme.
(a) Exceptional curves of the first kind. A closed subscheme (Closed immersions of schemes) is an exceptional curve of the first kind if:
- is an effective Cartier divisor on (Effective cartier divisor, Cartier divisor);
- there is a field and an isomorphism of schemes;
- the normal sheaf pulls back to . Equivalently, its dual, the conormal sheaf , pulls back to (Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Invertible sheaves).
Condition (3) is independent of the choice of the isomorphism in (2): any two such isomorphisms differ by an automorphism of , precomposition with changes the pulled-back normal sheaf by , and because pullback induces an automorphism of the Picard group , so it sends to or ; the latter is excluded by preservation of , since these have dimensions two and zero, respectively (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space). Thus it preserves . The twisting sheaves are classified by their twist index (The Picard group of the projective line, The twist index on the projective line is an isomorphism invariant). The degree of the normal sheaf is the integer with .
(b) Contractions. Let be an exceptional curve of the first kind. A contraction of is a proper morphism (Proper morphisms) such that:
- is a Noetherian scheme;
- there is a closed point whose local ring is regular of dimension ;
- together with is the blowup of at in the sense of Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf, and is identified with the scheme-theoretic exceptional fibre .
Thus a contraction is exactly, up to unique isomorphism over , the inverse of the blowing up of a regular point of a surface. The contracted curve is . Uniqueness with an initially unspecified target is a separate theorem proved later on this page.
(c) Contraction notation. If is a morphism of schemes and is an integral curve (Integral schemes), we say that is contracted by if is a single point of . This is a condition on alone and does not presuppose that is a blowup or that is exceptional.
(d) Dictionary on a regular projective surface. Let be a field, let be an integral regular projective surface over , and let be an integral effective Cartier divisor on (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface). Suppose is -isomorphic to for a finite extension , where is the constant field of , not the function field . Then is exceptional of the first kind exactly when
In particular, for over the criterion is . Indeed the normal line bundle is for a unique by The Picard group of the projective line and The twist index on the projective line is an isomorphism invariant, and the projective-space cohomology calculation (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space) gives
because restriction of scalars along multiplies the dimensions of the -vector spaces by and , have dimensions and for and respectively, with all other terms zero. By Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme the -degree of the invertible sheaf is therefore , and the restriction-degree identity (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction) applied to the effective Cartier divisors and on gives
Hence is exceptional of the first kind if and only if the normal twist is , which is equivalent to , and to when .
Remarks
- The dictionary (d) is the reason the notion of exceptional curve of the first kind can be checked in practice on a regular projective surface: the normal twist is an intersection number, and intersection numbers are computable without constructing a contraction. It says nothing about existence of a contraction of a given exceptional curve; that question is taken up by the contraction and factorisation theorems below.
- The scheme-theoretic exceptional fibre in (b) is the fibre product ; it is a -scheme isomorphic to (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf). Condition (3) records the extra requirement that the given is that fibre, not merely a curve lying over .
- The intersection number in (d) is defined on the regular projective surface in (d), over an arbitrary field; no embedding in projective space and no point of outside is used (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface).
- The Axiom of Choice is inherited: the degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper curve is defined through Euler characteristics, and the intersection product through the degree (Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme). No other choice principle is used, and no choice is made in the definition itself.
Depends on
- The Picard group of the projective line
- The Axiom of Choice
- Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf
- Cartier divisor
- Closed immersions of schemes
- Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme
- Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface
- Effective cartier divisor
- Integral schemes
- Invertible sheaves
- Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor
- Projective morphisms before Proj
- The twist index on the projective line is an isomorphism invariant
- Cohomology of O(d) on projective space
- Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction
- Proper morphisms
Used by
- Blowing up a smooth point: charts, exceptional curve, and contraction Example
- Blowing up a regular point is a contraction Lemma
- Universal property and uniqueness of a contraction Lemma
- What this page does and does not prove about contractions and resolution Remark
- Factorization of birational morphisms of regular surfaces into point blowups Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
87 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Section 54.16 (Contracting exceptional curves), tag 0C2I (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Lemma 54.3.1 (Blowing up a regular surface at a point), tag 0AGQ (standard reference, not scraped)
- Olivier Debarre, Introduction to Mori Theory (M2 course notes, 2016 version) (standard reference, not scraped)