How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the relative Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a scheme and let be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type (Quasi-coherent ideal sheaves), with zero scheme , the closed subscheme of cut out by . The blowup of along (or along ) is the -scheme
the relative Proj of Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra applied to the Rees algebra sheaf of Rees algebra sheaf of a finite type ideal, equipped with its structural morphism
and its relative twists , , both as in Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra. The notation records the ideal sheaf , not merely the closed subscheme ; the finite type hypothesis is part of the definition because the later structural results for blowups (invertibility of the pullback of , the exceptional divisor, and base change) are proved under it.
In the affine case with for an ideal , the Rees algebra sheaf is (Rees algebra sheaf of a finite type ideal), and the absolute case of the relative Proj construction identifies with the absolute Proj of the Rees algebra (Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra); the structural morphism is then the Proj structural morphism to .
The exceptional subscheme of the blowup is denoted and is introduced separately; no property of is assumed here.
Remarks
- The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the affine-local Proj construction used by Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra; the blowup selects no further data beyond that interface.
- This item only sets up the construction. Projectivity of , the universal property of the blowup, the invertibility of the pullback of , and flat base change are supplied by later items of this page and are not asserted here.
Depends on
Used by
- Blowing up a nonzero ideal on an integral scheme is birational Corollary
- Blowing up the base ideal resolves a rational map to projective space Corollary
- Uniqueness of the blowup Corollary
- Blowing up a point on a singular surface need not be smooth Counterexample
- Nonflat base change of a blowup can fail Counterexample
- Normalization and blowup are different operations Counterexample
- Exceptional subscheme of a blowup Definition
- Invariance of the blowup under invertible (fractional) rescaling of the ideal Definition
- Strict transform of a closed subscheme Definition
- Total transform of a Cartier divisor Definition
- A node is resolved by one point blowup Example
- Blowing up a principal ideal of a nonzerodivisor does nothing Example
- Blowing up the empty center is the identity Example
- The intersection form of the blown-up projective plane Example
- Two charts of the blowup of the affine plane at the origin Example
- A point blowup drops pairwise intersection multiplicity by at least one Lemma
- Blowing up a non-regular point strictly increases the finite normalization subalgebra Lemma
- Blowing up I and Iᵈ agree Lemma
- Blowups restrict to open subschemes of the base Lemma
- Integrality and reducedness of blowups from the Rees charts Lemma
- Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional curves at two-dimensional local rings Lemma
- Pushforward and vanishing for an affine point blowup Lemma
- Regularization of an integral curve on an arbitrary Noetherian ambient scheme Lemma
- The blowup is an isomorphism off the center Lemma
- The blowup is independent of chosen ideal generators Lemma
- The blowup of a one-dimensional integral Noetherian scheme at a closed point is finite Lemma
- The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme Lemma
- The finite normalization of a curve factors through the blowup of a closed point Lemma
- The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface Lemma
- Blowing up replaces the center by its projectivized normal directions Remark
- Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps Theorem
- Blowing up a rational point of a smooth surface Theorem
- Blowing up an effective Cartier divisor does nothing Theorem
- Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper Theorem
- Flat base change for blowups, and failure without flatness Theorem
- Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field Theorem
- Regularization of a one-dimensional integral curve with finite normalization by point blowups Theorem
- Separation of finitely many curve components by point blowups Theorem
- Strict transforms of closed subschemes are blowups of the subscheme Theorem
- The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone Theorem
…and 2 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Divisors, Sections 31.33-31.36 (Blowing up; Strict transform; Admissible blowups; Blowing up and flatness) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, June 27, 2011 draft (author-hosted 'Early (out-of-date) version of The Rising Sea') (standard reference, not scraped)