Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the relative Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let Z=V(I) be a closed subscheme of a scheme X cut out by a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf I of finite type (Quasi-coherent ideal sheaves) and let E=π−1(Z) be the exceptional subscheme of the blowup π ⁣:Bl⁡IX→X (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup). Then there is a canonical isomorphism of Z-schemes E⟶Proj⁡Z(gr⁡IOX)=Proj⁡Z(⨁n≥0In/In+1), the projectivized normal cone of Z in X. On an affine chart Spec⁡A with I=(f0,…,fr), the fibre of E over a point z of Z is Proj⁡(gr⁡I(A)⊗A/Iκ(z)), the projectivized fibre of the normal cone (for a closed point center this is its projectivized tangent cone), and the closed immersion E↪Bl⁡IX identifies E with the divisor V(a) in the chart Spec⁡A[I/a].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A scheme X, a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf I of finite type with zero scheme Z=V(I), the blowup π ⁣:Bl⁡IX=Proj⁡XR(I)→X (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf), the exceptional subscheme E=π−1(Z)=Z×XBl⁡IX with ideal sheaf IOBl⁡ (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup), and the associated graded sheaf gr⁡IOX=⨁n≥0In/In+1 (The associated graded ring and associated graded module of an ideal-adic filtration).

[F1]

Exceptional subscheme of a blowup: The exceptional subscheme is the scheme-theoretic inverse image E=Z×XBl⁡IX, with ideal sheaf the inverse image ideal IOBl⁡; it is a closed subscheme of the blowup mapping to Z.

[F2]

Relative Proj commutes with arbitrary base change: For a morphism S′→S and a quasi-coherent graded OS-algebra A, there is a canonical isomorphism Proj⁡SA×SS′≅Proj⁡S′(A⊗OSOS′), natural in the base and compatible with graded quotients; no flatness is needed.

[F3]

Rees algebra sheaf of a finite type ideal and The associated graded ring and associated graded module of an ideal-adic filtration: R(I)=⨁n≥0In, and the degree-n piece of R(I)/IR(I) is In/In+1, so R(I)/IR(I)≅gr⁡IOX as quasi-coherent graded OX-algebras; the identifications are compatible with restriction to open subschemes and with localisation.

[F4]

Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains and Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps: On the chart Spec⁡A[I/a]⊆Bl⁡ISpec⁡A, for a∈I, one has IA[I/a]=aA[I/a] with a a nonzerodivisor, and the charts over a generating family cover the blowup.

[F5]

Blowups restrict to open subschemes of the base: The blowup of U⊆X is the restriction of the blowup of X, canonically over U.

Proof

1.1F1F2F5

Let U=Spec⁡A⊆X be affine with I∣U=I~. Restricting the fibre product of [F1] to U gives E×XU=Spec⁡(A/I)×Spec⁡ABl⁡IU, and Bl⁡IU=Proj⁡AR(I); applying [F2] to the morphism Spec⁡(A/I)→Spec⁡A and the graded algebra R(I) yields a canonical isomorphism Proj⁡AR(I)×Spec⁡ASpec⁡(A/I)≅Proj⁡A/I(R(I)⊗AA/I).

1.2F1F4

In the standard chart Spec⁡A[I/a], a∈I, the ideal of E is IOBl⁡∣chart⁡=IA[I/a]=aA[I/a] by [F1] and [F4], so E meets the chart in V(a), and the charts over a generating family of I cover the blowup by [F4].

2.1F3step 1.1

By [F3] the graded A/I-algebra R(I)⊗AA/I=R(I)/IR(I) has degree-n piece In/In+1, so it is canonically gr⁡I(A); combining with step 1.1 gives a canonical isomorphism E×XU≅Proj⁡A/Igr⁡I(A) over Spec⁡(A/I).

3.1F2F3F5step 2.1

The isomorphisms of step 2.1 are canonical and compatible with restriction to smaller affine opens: for A→Af both Bl⁡ and the associated graded construction localise, InAf/In+1Af=(IAf)n/(IAf)n+1, and the identifications of [F2] are natural; hence they glue over an affine cover of X to a canonical isomorphism of Z-schemes E→Proj⁡Z(gr⁡IOX), the projectivized normal cone.

4.1F2step 3.1

For a point z∈Z, applying [F2] to the morphism Spec⁡κ(z)→Z and the graded OZ-algebra gr⁡IOX identifies the fibre of Proj⁡Z(gr⁡IOX) over z, and hence the fibre of E over z by step 3.1, with Proj⁡κ(z)(gr⁡I(A)⊗A/Iκ(z)); for a closed point center, where I=m is maximal, gr⁡m(A)=⨁n≥0mn/mn+1 is the associated graded ring of the local ring at the centre, so its Proj is the projectivized tangent cone.

5.1step 2.1step 1.2step 4.1∎

Steps 2.1, 1.2 and 4.1 prove all the assertions: E≅Proj⁡Z(gr⁡IOX) over Z, the fibre description over points of Z, and the identification of E with the divisor V(a) in each standard chart.

Remarks

  • The computation is the reason the exceptional divisor of a point blowup is a projective space: for a reduced point the associated graded of a regular local ring is a polynomial ring, so the projectivized tangent cone is projective space over the residue field.
  • No regularity, Noetherianity or reducedness of Z is assumed; the identification with the projectivized normal cone is purely a statement about the Rees algebra and its quotient by I.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources