How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Strict transforms of plane curves record tangent directions
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the blowup and Proj constructions (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field and let be a reduced plane curve through the origin with multiplicity and leading form (the degree- part of ). Let be the strict transform of under the blowup of the origin and let be the exceptional curve. Then is the closed subscheme of cut out by the form : its closed points correspond to the irreducible factors of , a factor of multiplicity contributes with multiplicity , and the underlying -cycle has total degree over . Over a field over which splits, these points are exactly the tangent directions of at the origin, with multiplicity. If is squarefree (in particular for a node, or for a cusp with reduced tangent cone) the strict transform meets transversally at each of these points.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a reduced plane curve through the origin with and leading form , the blowup of the origin with exceptional curve and its two standard charts, and the strict transform of .
Multiplicity of a hypersurface equation at a rational point: The expansion of about the origin is with homogeneous of degree ; equivalently has order in the local ring at the origin.
The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme: The blowup is with homogeneous coordinates on the second factor; its charts are with and , and with and , glued by inverting and with ; the exceptional curve is isomorphic to .
Strict-transform equation by removing the maximal exceptional power: In the first chart with , and is cut out there by ; symmetrically with , and is cut out in the second chart by .
Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor: The total transform is , and meets in the -cycle of degree cut out by the degree- leading form of a local equation of at the origin; the degree over is , because the origin is -rational.
All initial forms define the tangent cone and The scheme-theoretic tangent cone at a point: For the initial ideal is , so the tangent cone of at the origin is and the points of its projectivization are the tangent directions of at the origin.
The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone and Effective cartier divisor: is an effective Cartier divisor on , and is the projectivized normal cone of the origin in the plane, here ; its standard charts are with and with (Standard opens of Proj, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring).
Strict transform of a closed subscheme: is a reduced curve, cut out on the charts by the saturated ideals of [F3], and it has no component equal to because its components dominate components of while maps to the origin.
Contact order of two regular components at a point: For two distinct reduced curves with no common component meeting at a closed point , the contact order is a finite length, and if and only if the curves meet transversally at , that is, both are regular at with distinct tangent lines; the length is computed from local equations by .
Proof
Write as in [F1]. By [F2] the two charts cover and meet in the locus , and by [F3] the strict transform is cut out in them by the equations and , where and ; thus is computed in the first chart by the pair of equations , and in the second by , .
In the first chart is , and in the second chart it is . These are exactly the standard charts and of the closed subscheme : on one has and the defining equation , and on one has and , with the overlap inverting and . Hence as closed subschemes of , the closed subscheme cut out by the form .
By [F5] the ring is the tangent cone ring of at the origin, so is the projectivized tangent cone. Its closed points are the homogeneous prime ideals of containing and not the irrelevant ideal, that is, the irreducible factors of ; writing with irreducible homogeneous of degree , the point defined by has residue field of degree over . For a point lying in the first chart, that is , the local ring of at is , whose length as an -module is the exponent ; the point at infinity is computed in the second chart with the roles of and exchanged. So a factor of multiplicity contributes to with multiplicity . Over a splitting field of the factors are linear forms and the points are exactly the tangent directions of at the origin, with these multiplicities.
The underlying -cycle of has total degree over : by [F4] the intersection is the -cycle of degree cut out by the leading form, the origin being -rational. Equivalently, the degrees of the points weighted by the multiplicities add up to , matching the computation in the two charts of step 1.2.
Transversality in the squarefree case. Suppose is squarefree, so its irreducible factors occur with multiplicity one; this covers a node and a cusp with reduced tangent cone, where the leading form is a product of distinct linear or irreducible factors. Let be a closed point of lying in the first chart and let be the corresponding irreducible factor of , which is simple; the case of a point lying only in the second chart is symmetric. Write with a unit at , which is possible because and is simple. In the local ring with maximal ideal , the equation lies in and the quotient has maximal ideal generated by , because modulo and is a unit; hence is a regular one-dimensional local ring and . By [F8] contact order one is exactly transversality at , so and meet transversally at every point of when is squarefree.
Steps 1.2, 2.1, 3.1 and 3.2 prove all the assertions: is the closed subscheme of cut out by the form , its closed points are the irreducible factors of with the corresponding multiplicities, the underlying -cycle has total degree over , the points are the tangent directions of at the origin with multiplicity over a splitting field, and for squarefree the intersection is transverse at every point.
Remarks
- The theorem is the local input to the resolution algorithm on this page: a point of multiplicity whose leading form is a product of distinct linear forms is replaced by points at which the strict transform meets the new exceptional curve transversally.
- For a cusp the leading form is not squarefree, the strict transform meets at the single point with multiplicity two; its first strict transform has equation and is already regular, but tangent to ; this is why the resolution argument must be iterated rather than applied once, and A point blowup lowers pairwise contact order by one and separates transverse branches is the companion statement controlling the pairwise behaviour of regular branches.
Depends on
- The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme
- Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor
- Strict transform of a closed subscheme
- The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone
- Multiplicity of a hypersurface equation at a rational point
- The scheme-theoretic tangent cone at a point
- All initial forms define the tangent cone
- Effective cartier divisor
- Strict-transform equation by removing the maximal exceptional power
- Contact order of two regular components at a point
- Standard opens of Proj
- Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
80 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, June 27, 2011 draft (author-hosted 'Early (out-of-date) version of The Rising Sea') (standard reference, not scraped)
- Roman Bezrukavnikov et al., MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry (Fall 2015) consolidated lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)