Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strict transforms of plane curves record tangent directions

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the blowup and Proj constructions (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field and let C=V(f)⊆Ak2 be a reduced plane curve through the origin with multiplicity m=mult⁡0(C)≥1 and leading form fm (the degree-m part of f). Let C′ be the strict transform of C under the blowup of the origin and let E=Pk1 be the exceptional curve. Then C′∩E is the closed subscheme of E cut out by the form fm(u,v): its closed points correspond to the irreducible factors of fm, a factor of multiplicity s contributes with multiplicity s, and the underlying 0-cycle has total degree m over k. Over a field over which fm splits, these points are exactly the tangent directions of C at the origin, with multiplicity. If fm is squarefree (in particular for a node, or for a cusp with reduced tangent cone) the strict transform meets E transversally at each of these points.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, a reduced plane curve C=V(f)⊆Ak2=Spec⁡k[x,y] through the origin with m=mult⁡0(f)≥1 and leading form fm, the blowup π ⁣:S′→Ak2 of the origin with exceptional curve E and its two standard charts, and the strict transform C′ of C.

[F1]

Multiplicity of a hypersurface equation at a rational point: The expansion of f about the origin is f=fm+(terms of degree>m) with fm≠0 homogeneous of degree m; equivalently f has order m in the local ring at the origin.

[F2]

The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme: The blowup is V(xv−yu)⊆Ak2×Pk1 with homogeneous coordinates (u:v) on the second factor; its charts are Spec⁡k[x,s] with y=xs and E=V(x), and Spec⁡k[t,y] with x=yt and E=V(y), glued by inverting s and t with st=1; the exceptional curve is isomorphic to Pk1.

[F3]

Strict-transform equation by removing the maximal exceptional power: In the first chart f(x,xs)=xmg(x,s) with g(0,s)=fm(1,s)≠0, and C′ is cut out there by g=0; symmetrically f(yt,y)=ymh(t,y) with h(t,0)=fm(t,1)≠0, and C′ is cut out in the second chart by h=0.

[F4]

Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor: The total transform is π∗C=C′+mE, and C′ meets E in the 0-cycle of degree m cut out by the degree-m leading form of a local equation of C at the origin; the degree over k is m [κ(0):k]=m, because the origin is k-rational.

[F5]

All initial forms define the tangent cone and The scheme-theoretic tangent cone at a point: For I=(f) the initial ideal is in⁡(I)=(fm), so the tangent cone of C at the origin is Cone⁡0(C)=Spec⁡(k[u,v]/(fm)), and the points of its projectivization are the tangent directions of C at the origin.

[F6]

The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone and Effective cartier divisor: E is an effective Cartier divisor on S′, and E is the projectivized normal cone of the origin in the plane, here Pk1=Proj⁡k[u,v]; its standard charts are Spec⁡k[s] with s=v/u and Spec⁡k[t] with t=u/v (Standard opens of Proj, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring).

[F7]

Strict transform of a closed subscheme: C′ is a reduced curve, cut out on the charts by the saturated ideals of [F3], and it has no component equal to E because its components dominate components of C while E maps to the origin.

[F8]

Contact order of two regular components at a point: For two distinct reduced curves with no common component meeting at a closed point q, the contact order nq is a finite length, and nq=1 if and only if the curves meet transversally at q, that is, both are regular at q with distinct tangent lines; the length is computed from local equations by nq=length⁡OY,q(OY,q/zOY,q).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3

Write f=fm+fm+1+⋯ as in [F1]. By [F2] the two charts cover S′ and meet in the locus st=1, and by [F3] the strict transform is cut out in them by the equations g=0 and h=0, where g(0,s)=fm(1,s) and h(t,0)=fm(t,1); thus C′∩E is computed in the first chart by the pair of equations x=0, g=0 and in the second by y=0, h=0.

1.2F2F3F6algebra

In the first chart C′∩E is Spec⁡k[s]/(g(0,s))=Spec⁡k[s]/(fm(1,s)), and in the second chart it is Spec⁡k[t]/(fm(t,1)). These are exactly the standard charts D+(u) and D+(v) of the closed subscheme Z=Proj⁡(k[U,V]/(fm))⊆Pk1=Proj⁡k[U,V]: on D+(u) one has s=v/u and the defining equation fm(1,s)=0, and on D+(v) one has t=u/v and fm(t,1)=0, with the overlap inverting s and t. Hence C′∩E≅Z as closed subschemes of E, the closed subscheme cut out by the form fm(u,v).

2.1F2F5step 1.2algebra

By [F5] the ring k[U,V]/(fm) is the tangent cone ring of C at the origin, so Z=Proj⁡(Cone⁡0(C)) is the projectivized tangent cone. Its closed points are the homogeneous prime ideals of k[U,V] containing fm and not the irrelevant ideal, that is, the irreducible factors of fm; writing fm=∏ipisi with pi irreducible homogeneous of degree di, the point qi defined by pi has residue field of degree di over k. For a point qi lying in the first chart, that is pi≠U, the local ring of Z at qi is k[s](pi(1,s))/(fm(1,s)), whose length as an OZ,qi-module is the exponent si; the point at infinity is computed in the second chart with the roles of U and V exchanged. So a factor of multiplicity s contributes to C′∩E with multiplicity s. Over a splitting field of fm the factors pi are linear forms and the points qi are exactly the tangent directions of C at the origin, with these multiplicities.

3.1F4step 2.1

The underlying 0-cycle of C′∩E has total degree m over k: by [F4] the intersection is the 0-cycle of degree m cut out by the leading form, the origin being k-rational. Equivalently, the degrees of the points qi weighted by the multiplicities si add up to m, matching the computation in the two charts of step 1.2.

3.2F7F8step 1.2step 2.1

Transversality in the squarefree case. Suppose fm is squarefree, so its irreducible factors occur with multiplicity one; this covers a node and a cusp with reduced tangent cone, where the leading form is a product of distinct linear or irreducible factors. Let q be a closed point of C′∩E lying in the first chart and let p(s) be the corresponding irreducible factor of fm(1,s), which is simple; the case of a point lying only in the second chart is symmetric. Write g(x,s)=p(s)u(s)+xw(x,s) with u(s) a unit at p, which is possible because g(0,s)=fm(1,s)=p(s)u(s) and p is simple. In the local ring OS′,q with maximal ideal m=(x,p(s)), the equation g lies in m∖m2 and the quotient OC′,q=OS′,q/(g) has maximal ideal generated by x, because p(s)u(s)≡−xw(x,s) modulo g and u is a unit; hence OC′,q is a regular one-dimensional local ring and nq(C′,E)=length⁡OC′,q(OC′,q/xOC′,q)=1. By [F8] contact order one is exactly transversality at q, so C′ and E meet transversally at every point of C′∩E when fm is squarefree.

4.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2∎

Steps 1.2, 2.1, 3.1 and 3.2 prove all the assertions: C′∩E is the closed subscheme of E=Pk1 cut out by the form fm(u,v), its closed points are the irreducible factors of fm with the corresponding multiplicities, the underlying 0-cycle has total degree m over k, the points are the tangent directions of C at the origin with multiplicity over a splitting field, and for squarefree fm the intersection is transverse at every point.

Remarks

  • The theorem is the local input to the resolution algorithm on this page: a point of multiplicity m≥2 whose leading form is a product of m distinct linear forms is replaced by m points at which the strict transform meets the new exceptional curve transversally.
  • For a cusp y2=x3 the leading form y2 is not squarefree, the strict transform meets E at the single point [1:0] with multiplicity two; its first strict transform has equation s2=x and is already regular, but tangent to E; this is why the resolution argument must be iterated rather than applied once, and A point blowup lowers pairwise contact order by one and separates transverse branches is the companion statement controlling the pairwise behaviour of regular branches.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

80 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources