How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
First blowup of the node y^2=x^3+x^2 separates its branches
Example
Let over a field of characteristic not , with its node at the origin. In the chart the total transform is , so the strict transform is , which meets at the two distinct points and ; the other chart contributes no additional points of . Hence the two branches of the node are separated by one point blowup, and the strict transform is regular and transverse to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field of characteristic not , the nodal plane curve with node at the origin, the blowup of the origin with exceptional curve , its two standard charts, and the strict transform .
Choice. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the blowup construction; the explicit chart computations below use no further choice. (The Axiom of Choice).
Strict-transform equation by removing the maximal exceptional power: In the chart with coordinates where , the total transform equation of a curve of multiplicity is with the leading form evaluated at , and the strict transform is defined by ; symmetrically in the other chart.
The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme: For the two standard charts are with and with , glued by inverting and with ; the exceptional divisor is and respectively and is .
Strict transform of a closed subscheme: The strict transform is the scheme-theoretic closure of the inverse image of the complement of the center; in a chart where the ideal of is invertible it is cut by the saturation of the inverse-image ideal by that ideal.
Strict transforms of plane curves record tangent directions: For a reduced plane curve through the origin of multiplicity with leading form , the scheme is cut out on by the form : its closed points correspond to the irreducible factors of , a factor of multiplicity contributes with multiplicity , and the -cycle has total degree ; over a field over which splits these points are exactly the tangent directions of at the origin, and if is squarefree the strict transform meets transversally at each of them.
Verification
In the first chart of [F2] write , so the chart ring is with and , and let , a reduced equation of of multiplicity at the origin with leading form , which is squarefree because the characteristic is not ; substituting gives with not divisible by , since its reduction modulo is , so the strict transform is cut in this chart by by [F1] and [F3].
In this chart , the two distinct points and ; at each of them the local ring of is with the equation of restricting to , which has a simple zero at each point, so the contact order is one and meets transversally there; this agrees with [F4], since is squarefree with the two distinct roots , the two tangent directions of at the origin. The curve is regular, its gradient being nowhere zero, so the strict transform is regular at both points.
In the second chart of [F2] write , so the chart ring is with and ; substituting gives , so the strict transform is cut in this chart by and meets where and , namely at and ; these are the same two points as and , because on the overlap of [F2], and there is no further point of on in this chart, so the other chart contributes no additional points of .
Consequently consists exactly of the two distinct points over the node, one for each of the two factors and of the leading form, so the two branches of the node, whose tangent directions are those two factors, arrive at distinct points of and are separated by the one point blowup; the strict transform is regular and transverse to at both points, and in the first chart it is the smooth conic-like curve while in the second chart it is , the two descriptions agreeing on the overlap.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, June 27, 2011 draft (author-hosted 'Early (out-of-date) version of The Rising Sea') (standard reference, not scraped)
- Roman Bezrukavnikov et al., MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry (Fall 2015) consolidated lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10 (standard reference, not scraped)