Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Resolving the rational map [x:y] at the origin

Example

Let k be a field and let φ ⁣:Ak2⇢Pk1, (x,y)↦[x:y] on Ak2∖{0}, be the rational map recording the ratio of the coordinates, whose base ideal is the maximal ideal I=(x,y)⊆k[x,y] of the origin. Blowing up the origin resolves the indeterminacy: after the blowup the map extends to a morphism f ⁣:Bl⁡0Ak2⟶Pk1, which on the chart with coordinates (x,s), y=xs, sends a point to the ratio s (that is, to [x:y]=[1:s]), on the other chart with coordinates (t,y), x=yt, sends a point to [x:y]=[t:1], and which is the projection V(xv−yu)→Pk1 of the incidence model Bl⁡0Ak2=V(xv−yu)⊆Ak2×Pk1 (The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme). The exceptional curve E is the fibre of the first projection over the origin, and the second projection restricts to an isomorphism E→ ∼ Pk1: over the origin the equation xv−yu imposes no condition on [u:v], so the fibre is the full projective line, and every normal direction occurs exactly once.

The mechanism is the general base-ideal statement (Blowing up the base ideal resolves a rational map to projective space): the pair consisting of OA2 and its two coordinate sections x,y defines φ on Ak2∖{0} through the equivalence between morphisms to projective space and globally generated line bundles with chosen sections (Maps to projective space equal generating line-bundle data), and those two sections generate the base ideal I=(x,y). This is the standard model example of resolving indeterminacy by blowing up a base ideal, and the resolution is the graph of the extended map inside Ak2×Pk1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the rational map φ ⁣:Ak2⇢Pk1, (x,y)↦[x:y], the line bundle OA2 with its two coordinate sections x,y, the base ideal I=(x,y), the blowup Bl⁡0Ak2 and its incidence model. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the blowup and Proj constructions cited below.

[F1]

Blowing up the base ideal resolves a rational map to projective space: For an integral finite-type k-scheme with a nonzero meromorphic tuple in an invertible sheaf, the fractional base-ideal blowup resolves its ratios and is the schematic closure of their graph. For regular sections of OX, the base ideal is the ordinary ideal they generate.

[F2]

The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme: With homogeneous coordinates (u:v), the blowup of the origin is V(xv−yu)⊆Ak2×Pk1; its charts are Spec⁡k[x,s] with y=xs and E=V(x), and Spec⁡k[t,y] with x=yt and E=V(y), glued by st=1; the exceptional curve is isomorphic to Pk1.

[F3]

Maps to projective space equal generating line-bundle data: Sending a morphism ψ ⁣:X→P1 to the pair (ψ∗O(1);ψ∗u,ψ∗v) is a bijection between morphisms to P1 and isomorphism classes of invertible sheaves with two generating global sections.

Verification

1.1F3

The two coordinate functions x,y are global sections of the line bundle OA2; they generate it over A2∖{0}=D(x)∪D(y), and the image of the map OA22→OA2, (a,b)↦ax+by, is the ideal (x,y). Hence φ is the rational map attached by [F3] to this pair of sections, and its base ideal is I=(x,y), the maximal ideal of the origin.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

By [F1] applied to X=Ak2, L=O and the sections x,y, the blowup Bl⁡IAk2 resolves φ: the induced map is the unique morphism extending φ, characterized by the pulled-back sections. Since I=(x,y) is the ideal of the origin, Bl⁡IAk2=Bl⁡0Ak2, which by [F2] is the incidence subscheme Z=V(xv−yu)⊆Ak2×Pk1; on the chart with coordinates (x,s), y=xs, one has [x:y]=[1:s] and the second projection sends a point to [1:s], while on the chart with coordinates (t,y), x=yt, it sends a point to [t:1]. Both formulas agree with (x,y)↦[x:y] wherever the latter is defined, so the second projection is the resolved morphism.

3.1F2step 2.1∎

The exceptional curve of the blowup is E=π−1(0), the fibre of the first projection of Z over the origin. Over 0 the conditions x=y=0 become vacuous in the incidence equation, so E={0}×Pk1 and the second projection restricts to an isomorphism E→Pk1; every normal direction occurs exactly once. Therefore the rational map is resolved by the blowup, the extension is the projection of the incidence model, and the exceptional curve maps isomorphically onto Pk1.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources