Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Proj constructions used below (The Axiom of Choice). Let B be a commutative ring with 1, X=Spec⁡B[x,y]=AB2 and I=(x,y)⊆B[x,y]. With homogeneous coordinates u,v on PB1, the blowup Bl⁡IX of Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf is V(xv−yu)⊆X×BPB1, and the projection is its structural morphism. Its two standard charts are Spec⁡B[x,T] with y=xT and Spec⁡B[y,U] with x=yU; their overlap inverts T and U with TU=1. The exceptional subscheme is V(x) and V(y) respectively and is isomorphic to PB1. In particular this holds over any field B=k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring B, the polynomial ring B[x,y], the ideal I=(x,y), the Rees algebra R(I)=⨁n≥0Intn (Rees algebra sheaf of a finite type ideal), the blowup Bl⁡ISpec⁡B[x,y]=Proj⁡B[x,y]R(I) (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf), and the projective line PB1 with standard charts U0=Spec⁡B[t0], U1=Spec⁡B[t1] glued by t0↦1/t1 (Relative projective space from standard charts).

[F1]

Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps: For I=(f0,…,fr) the standard opens D+(fit)=Spec⁡A[I/fi] cover Bl⁡ISpec⁡A, with overlap identifications given by the ratios (fjt)/(fit).

[F2]

Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains: For a∈I the affine blowup algebra A[I/a]=(R(I))(a) has IA[I/a]=aA[I/a] with a a nonzerodivisor and (A[I/a])a=Aa, and is independent of the chosen generating set; for I=(a,a1,…,ar) the surjection A[x1,…,xr]/(axi−ai)→A[I/a], xi↦ai/a, has kernel the a-power torsion.

[F3]

Relative projective space from standard charts, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring: PB1 is the gluing of its two standard charts, and for every commutative ring A there is a canonical isomorphism Proj⁡A[u,v]≅PA1, natural in A; in particular PB[x,y]1≅X×BPB1 over Spec⁡B.

[F4]

Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals: A homogeneous element f of A[u,v] of degree d>0 cuts out the closed subscheme V+(f)=Proj⁡(A[u,v]/(f))↪PA1 (Closed immersions of schemes), whose intersection with the standard open D+(u) is Spec⁡(A[u,v](u)/(f/ud)) (Standard opens of Proj).

[F5]

Exceptional subscheme of a blowup: The exceptional subscheme is the scheme-theoretic inverse image of the center, cut out by its inverse-image ideal.

Proof

1.1F1

The graded B[x,y]-algebra homomorphism B[x,y][u,v]→R(I) with u↦xt, v↦yt is surjective, since In=(x,y)n is generated by the monomials xn−iyi, and its kernel is (xv−yu): the degree-zero kernel is zero, and for a homogeneous F=∑i=0nciun−ivi with n≥1 and F(x,y)=0, reduction modulo x gives cnyn≡0(modx), so cn=xd because y is a nonzerodivisor modulo x in the polynomial ring B[x,y]; then F−dvn−1(xv−yu)=uG with G homogeneous of degree n−1, and 0=F(x,y)=xG(x,y) forces G(x,y)=0 because x is a nonzerodivisor, so induction on n gives F∈(xv−yu); conversely xv−yu↦0, and thus R(I)≅B[x,y][u,v]/(xv−yu) as graded B[x,y]-algebras.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1

Consequently Bl⁡IX=Proj⁡B[x,y](B[x,y][u,v]/(xv−yu)), and by [F4] with A=B[x,y] this is the closed subscheme V(xv−yu) of PB[x,y]1≅X×BPB1 of [F3]; under this identification the structural morphism of the blowup is the projection to X, and the standard charts of [F1] are D+(u)∩V(xv−yu) and D+(v)∩V(xv−yu).

3.1F4step 2.1

Computing the two charts by [F4]: on D+(u) the dehomogenised equation is x(v/u)−y=0 in B[x,y,v/u], so the chart ring is B[x,T] with T=v/u and y=xT; on D+(v) it is the quotient of B[x,y,u/v] by y(u/v)−x, that is B[y,U] with U=u/v and x=yU. On the overlap D+(uv) both u and v are invertible, so T=v/u and U=u/v are mutually inverse units, TU=1, and the two chart rings agree on the overlap as localisations B[x,T]T and B[y,U]U under T↦U−1.

4.1F2F3F5step 3.1

By [F5], the exceptional subscheme is the inverse image of the origin V(x,y); by [F2] its ideal on the first chart is IB[x,T]=(x,xT)=(x), so E∩D+(u)=V(x)=Spec⁡B[T], and on the second chart it is IB[y,U]=(yU,y)=(y), so E∩D+(v)=V(y)=Spec⁡B[U]. On the overlap the rings B[T]T=B[T,T−1] and B[U]U=B[U,U−1] are identified by T↦U−1, which is exactly the gluing datum of the standard charts U0,U1 of PB1 in [F3]; hence E≅PB1.

5.1F3step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Assembling steps 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1: the blowup is V(xv−yu)⊆X×BPB1 with the projection as structural morphism, its charts are Spec⁡B[x,T] with y=xT and Spec⁡B[y,U] with x=yU glued by TU=1, and the exceptional subscheme is PB1; no hypothesis on B beyond commutativity was used, so the statement specialises to any field B=k.

Remarks

  • The proof uses only that x is a nonzerodivisor of B[x,y] and that y is a nonzerodivisor modulo x; neither B a domain nor B a field is needed, and the zero ring gives the empty blowup on both sides.
  • The equation xv−yu=0 is the incidence relation of the point (x,y) and the line [u:v], which is why the blowup is described as the incidence scheme; the strict transform computations of this page use this explicit presentation in the two charts.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources