How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Proj constructions used below (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a commutative ring with , and . With homogeneous coordinates on , the blowup of Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf is , and the projection is its structural morphism. Its two standard charts are with and with ; their overlap inverts and with . The exceptional subscheme is and respectively and is isomorphic to . In particular this holds over any field .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , the polynomial ring , the ideal , the Rees algebra (Rees algebra sheaf of a finite type ideal), the blowup (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf), and the projective line with standard charts , glued by (Relative projective space from standard charts).
Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps: For the standard opens cover , with overlap identifications given by the ratios .
Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains: For the affine blowup algebra has with a nonzerodivisor and , and is independent of the chosen generating set; for the surjection , , has kernel the -power torsion.
Relative projective space from standard charts, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring: is the gluing of its two standard charts, and for every commutative ring there is a canonical isomorphism , natural in ; in particular over .
Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals: A homogeneous element of of degree cuts out the closed subscheme (Closed immersions of schemes), whose intersection with the standard open is (Standard opens of Proj).
Exceptional subscheme of a blowup: The exceptional subscheme is the scheme-theoretic inverse image of the center, cut out by its inverse-image ideal.
Proof
The graded -algebra homomorphism with , is surjective, since is generated by the monomials , and its kernel is : the degree-zero kernel is zero, and for a homogeneous with and , reduction modulo gives , so because is a nonzerodivisor modulo in the polynomial ring ; then with homogeneous of degree , and forces because is a nonzerodivisor, so induction on gives ; conversely , and thus as graded -algebras.
Consequently , and by [F4] with this is the closed subscheme of of [F3]; under this identification the structural morphism of the blowup is the projection to , and the standard charts of [F1] are and .
Computing the two charts by [F4]: on the dehomogenised equation is in , so the chart ring is with and ; on it is the quotient of by , that is with and . On the overlap both and are invertible, so and are mutually inverse units, , and the two chart rings agree on the overlap as localisations and under .
By [F5], the exceptional subscheme is the inverse image of the origin ; by [F2] its ideal on the first chart is , so , and on the second chart it is , so . On the overlap the rings and are identified by , which is exactly the gluing datum of the standard charts of in [F3]; hence .
Assembling steps 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1: the blowup is with the projection as structural morphism, its charts are with and with glued by , and the exceptional subscheme is ; no hypothesis on beyond commutativity was used, so the statement specialises to any field .
Remarks
- The proof uses only that is a nonzerodivisor of and that is a nonzerodivisor modulo ; neither a domain nor a field is needed, and the zero ring gives the empty blowup on both sides.
- The equation is the incidence relation of the point and the line , which is why the blowup is described as the incidence scheme; the strict transform computations of this page use this explicit presentation in the two charts.
Depends on
- Exceptional subscheme of a blowup
- Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf
- Rees algebra sheaf of a finite type ideal
- Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps
- Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains
- Relative projective space from standard charts
- Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring
- Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals
- Closed immersions of schemes
- Standard opens of Proj
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- Nonflat base change of a blowup can fail Counterexample
- First blowup of the cusp y²=x³ Example
- First blowup of the node y²=x³+x² separates its branches Example
- Resolving the rational map [x:y] at the origin Example
- Total and strict transform of a line through the origin Example
- Two charts of the blowup of the affine plane at the origin Example
- Strict-transform equation by removing the maximal exceptional power Lemma
- Blowing up a rational point of a smooth surface Theorem
- Strict transforms of plane curves record tangent directions Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, June 27, 2011 draft (author-hosted 'Early (out-of-date) version of The Rising Sea') (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Divisors, Sections 31.33-31.36 (Blowing up; Strict transform; Admissible blowups; Blowing up and flatness) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Roman Bezrukavnikov et al., MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry (Fall 2015) consolidated lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)