Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two charts of the blowup of the affine plane at the origin

Example

Let k be a field and consider Bl⁡0A2 for the ideal (x,y). The two standard charts are Spec⁡k[x,y][y/x]=Spec⁡k[x,y/x] and Spec⁡k[x/y,y], each isomorphic to Ak2, glued along the overlap D(y/x)↔D(x/y) with (y/x)(x/y)=1; the exceptional curve E is cut by x in the first chart and by y in the second, and the projection to Ak2 is the identity on the complement of E and contracts E to the origin. The total transform of a line through the origin is (the strict transform of the line) +E.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the scheme Ak2=Spec⁡k[x,y], the ideal (x,y) and its blowup.

[A1]

Choice. The Axiom of Choice is assumed as inherited from the relative Proj construction; no further choice is used in this computation.

[F1]

The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme: With homogeneous coordinates u,v on Pk1, the blowup is V(xv−yu)⊆Ak2×kPk1 with structural morphism as projection; its two standard charts are Spec⁡k[x,T] with y=xT and Spec⁡k[y,U] with x=yU, their overlap inverts T and U with TU=1, and the exceptional divisor is V(x) and V(y) respectively and is Pk1.

[F2]

Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps: For I=(x,y) in k[x,y], the standard opens Spec⁡k[x,y][I/x] and Spec⁡k[x,y][I/y] cover the blowup, with transition map uxy=y/x↦uyx−1, where uyx=x/y on the overlap.

[F3]

Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains: A[I/a] has IA[I/a]=a A[I/a] and (A[I/a])a=Aa.

[F5]

Relative projective space from standard charts: Pk1 is covered by the two standard affine charts Spec⁡k[T] and Spec⁡k[U] with overlap TU=1.

Verification

1.1A1F1F2

The blowup is V(xv−yu)⊆Ak2×kPk1 by [F1], and its two standard charts are Spec⁡k[x,T] with y=xT and Spec⁡k[y,U] with x=yU; these are exactly the affine blowup algebras k[x,y][I/x] and k[x,y][I/y] of [F2] and [F3], and by [F5] the two charts of Pk1 glue along TU=1.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

Each chart ring is a polynomial ring in two variables over k, namely k[x,T]≅k[x,y/x] and k[y,U]≅k[x/y,y], so Spec⁡k[x,y][I/x]=Spec⁡k[x,T]≅Ak2 and Spec⁡k[y,U]≅Ak2; the overlap is the open subscheme D(T)=D(U−1) of the first chart, identified with D(U) in the second by T↦U−1.

3.1F1F5step 2.1

By [F1] the exceptional divisor is cut by x in the first chart and by y in the second, and it is Pk1: in the first chart E∩{x≠0} is empty and E is the line V(x)≅Spec⁡k[T], in the second E=V(y)≅Spec⁡k[U], and the two affine lines glue along TU=1 by [F5].

4.1step 2.1step 3.1

The projection sends the first chart to Ak2 by (x,T)↦(x,xT) and the second by (y,U)↦(yU,y): on the open locus x≠0 of the first chart the formula is inverted by T=y/x, so the projection restricts to an isomorphism onto {(x,y):x≠0}, and symmetrically the second chart is isomorphic to {(x,y):y≠0} over the base. These two open subschemes cover Ak2∖{0} and the inverses agree on the overlap because T=U−1 there (step 2.1), so the projection is the identity over Ak2∖{0}. It contracts E to the origin: on E the first chart has x=0 and image (0,0), and on the second y=0 and image (0,0), while every point of E lies in one of the two charts (step 3.1).

5.1F1F3step 1.1∎

Let L=V(ℓ) be a line through the origin and first suppose ℓ=y−ax with a∈k. In the first chart the pulled-back equation is xT−ax=x(T−a), so the pullback divisor is the sum of E=V(x) and the strict transform V(T−a); in the second chart it is y−ayU=y(1−aU), the sum of E=V(y) and V(1−aU), and for a≠0 the two strict-transform pieces glue at the same exceptional point with coordinates T=a, U=a−1; for a=0 the second piece is empty and the exceptional intersection is T=0. For the vertical line ℓ=x the first chart gives x, namely E, and the second gives yU, namely E plus the strict transform V(U); so in both cases the total transform is the strict transform plus E, with multiplicity one along E.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources