How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Two charts of the blowup of the affine plane at the origin
Example
Let be a field and consider for the ideal . The two standard charts are and , each isomorphic to , glued along the overlap with ; the exceptional curve is cut by in the first chart and by in the second, and the projection to is the identity on the complement of and contracts to the origin. The total transform of a line through the origin is (the strict transform of the line) .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the scheme , the ideal and its blowup.
Choice. The Axiom of Choice is assumed as inherited from the relative Proj construction; no further choice is used in this computation.
The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme: With homogeneous coordinates on , the blowup is with structural morphism as projection; its two standard charts are with and with , their overlap inverts and with , and the exceptional divisor is and respectively and is .
Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps: For in , the standard opens and cover the blowup, with transition map , where on the overlap.
Relative projective space from standard charts: is covered by the two standard affine charts and with overlap .
Verification
The blowup is by [F1], and its two standard charts are with and with ; these are exactly the affine blowup algebras and of [F2] and [F3], and by [F5] the two charts of glue along .
Each chart ring is a polynomial ring in two variables over , namely and , so and ; the overlap is the open subscheme of the first chart, identified with in the second by .
By [F1] the exceptional divisor is cut by in the first chart and by in the second, and it is : in the first chart is empty and is the line , in the second , and the two affine lines glue along by [F5].
The projection sends the first chart to by and the second by : on the open locus of the first chart the formula is inverted by , so the projection restricts to an isomorphism onto , and symmetrically the second chart is isomorphic to over the base. These two open subschemes cover and the inverses agree on the overlap because there (step 2.1), so the projection is the identity over . It contracts to the origin: on the first chart has and image , and on the second and image , while every point of lies in one of the two charts (step 3.1).
Let be a line through the origin and first suppose with . In the first chart the pulled-back equation is , so the pullback divisor is the sum of and the strict transform ; in the second chart it is , the sum of and , and for the two strict-transform pieces glue at the same exceptional point with coordinates , ; for the second piece is empty and the exceptional intersection is . For the vertical line the first chart gives , namely , and the second gives , namely plus the strict transform ; so in both cases the total transform is the strict transform plus , with multiplicity one along .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, June 27, 2011 draft (author-hosted 'Early (out-of-date) version of The Rising Sea') (standard reference, not scraped)
- Roman Bezrukavnikov et al., MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry (Fall 2015) consolidated lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)