Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exceptional divisor of the blowup of A^3 at the origin is P^2

Example

Let k be a field. The blowup of Ak3 at the origin for I=(x,y,z) is the subscheme of A3×P2 cut out by the 2×2 minors xiTj−xjTi of the matrix with rows (x,y,z) and (T0,T1,T2); its three standard charts are Spec⁡k[x,y/x,z/x], Spec⁡k[x/y,y,z/y] and Spec⁡k[x/z,y/z,z], each isomorphic to Ak3. The exceptional divisor is cut by x in the first chart, by y in the second and by z in the third, and is isomorphic to Pk2, with OE(E)=OPk2(−1) in the quotient convention.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the affine space Ak3=Spec⁡k[x,y,z], the ideal I=(x,y,z) of the origin, and the blowup of the origin.

[A1]

Choice. The Axiom of Choice is assumed as inherited from the blowup and Proj constructions used below. (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps: For I=(f0,…,fr)⊆A the charts Spec⁡A[I/fi] cover Bl⁡ISpec⁡A, glued by the displayed transition functions.

[F2]

Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains: A[I/a] has I A[I/a]=a A[I/a] and (A[I/a])a=Aa, and for I=(a0,…,ar), a=a0, it is generated by the ratios ai/a.

[F3]

The blowup is independent of chosen ideal generators: Different finite local generating families of I give canonically isomorphic chart presentations of the same blowup; the affine blowup presentations A[I/a] are canonically the standard charts.

[F4]

Exceptional subscheme of a blowup: E=π−1(Z) is the zero scheme of the inverse-image ideal IOBl⁡.

[F5]

The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone: E≅Proj⁡Z(gr⁡IOX) canonically.

[F6]

Regular centers have projective-bundle exceptional divisors: For a regular center, E≅PZ(I/I2)=Proj⁡ZSym⁡(I/I2) in the quotient convention; for the origin of A3 the conormal space is free of rank three, so this is Pk2.

[F7]

The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier: IOBl⁡=O(1)=O(−E) and OBl⁡(E)=O(−1).

Verification

1.1A1F1F2F3

The three charts of the blowup are Spec⁡A[I/x], Spec⁡A[I/y], Spec⁡A[I/z] by [F1]; by [F2] the first is A-generated by y/x and z/x, with I A[I/x]=x A[I/x], the map from k[x,s,t] sending s to y/x and t to z/x is injective, since after inverting x it is the coordinate change y=xs, z=xt in k[x,x−1,y,z]. Thus it is the polynomial ring k[x,y/x,z/x]≅k[x,s,t], whose spectrum is Ak3; symmetrically the other two charts are k[x/y,y,z/y] and k[x/z,y/z,z], each isomorphic to Ak3, glued by the transition ratios of [F1] and [F3].

2.1F1F3step 1.1

The same blowup is presented inside A3×P2 by the 2×2 minors of (xyzT0T1T2): on the chart D+(T0) set T0=1. The minor equations become xT1=y, xT2=z, the third minor being a consequence of these two. Eliminating y,z gives exactly the first polynomial chart of step 1.1. The other charts are symmetric; their ratio transitions coincide with those of the blowup, so the chart isomorphisms glue to the claimed closed incidence subscheme, without needing a separate assertion about the kernel of the entire Rees presentation.

3.1F2F4F5F6step 2.1

The exceptional divisor is cut by x in the first chart, by y in the second and by z in the third: on each chart IO is generated by the corresponding variable, by [F2] and [F4]. By [F5] and [F6] it is Proj⁡k(gr⁡(x,y,z)k[x,y,z]0)=Proj⁡kk[X,Y,Z]=Pk2, the projectivized cotangent space in the quotient convention, since the conormal space m/m2 is free of rank three over k.

4.1F7step 3.1∎

Finally [F7] gives OBl⁡(E)=O(−1) and OBl⁡(−E)=IOBl⁡=O(1); restricting the first identity to E and using the identification E=Proj⁡kgr⁡mk[x,y,z]0=Pk2 of step 3.1, the restricted twist is the standard OPk2(−1), so OE(E)=OPk2(−1) in the quotient convention.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources