How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exceptional divisor of the blowup of A^3 at the origin is P^2
Example
Let be a field. The blowup of at the origin for is the subscheme of cut out by the minors of the matrix with rows and ; its three standard charts are , and , each isomorphic to . The exceptional divisor is cut by in the first chart, by in the second and by in the third, and is isomorphic to , with in the quotient convention.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the affine space , the ideal of the origin, and the blowup of the origin.
Choice. The Axiom of Choice is assumed as inherited from the blowup and Proj constructions used below. (The Axiom of Choice).
Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps: For the charts cover , glued by the displayed transition functions.
Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains: has and , and for , , it is generated by the ratios .
The blowup is independent of chosen ideal generators: Different finite local generating families of give canonically isomorphic chart presentations of the same blowup; the affine blowup presentations are canonically the standard charts.
Exceptional subscheme of a blowup: is the zero scheme of the inverse-image ideal .
The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone: canonically.
Regular centers have projective-bundle exceptional divisors: For a regular center, in the quotient convention; for the origin of the conormal space is free of rank three, so this is .
Verification
The three charts of the blowup are , , by [F1]; by [F2] the first is -generated by and , with , the map from sending to and to is injective, since after inverting it is the coordinate change , in . Thus it is the polynomial ring , whose spectrum is ; symmetrically the other two charts are and , each isomorphic to , glued by the transition ratios of [F1] and [F3].
The same blowup is presented inside by the minors of : on the chart set . The minor equations become , , the third minor being a consequence of these two. Eliminating gives exactly the first polynomial chart of step 1.1. The other charts are symmetric; their ratio transitions coincide with those of the blowup, so the chart isomorphisms glue to the claimed closed incidence subscheme, without needing a separate assertion about the kernel of the entire Rees presentation.
The exceptional divisor is cut by in the first chart, by in the second and by in the third: on each chart is generated by the corresponding variable, by [F2] and [F4]. By [F5] and [F6] it is , the projectivized cotangent space in the quotient convention, since the conormal space is free of rank three over .
Finally [F7] gives and ; restricting the first identity to and using the identification of step 3.1, the restricted twist is the standard , so in the quotient convention.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps
- Exceptional subscheme of a blowup
- The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone
- Regular centers have projective-bundle exceptional divisors
- The blowup is independent of chosen ideal generators
- Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains
- The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, June 27, 2011 draft (author-hosted 'Early (out-of-date) version of The Rising Sea') (standard reference, not scraped)
- Roman Bezrukavnikov et al., MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry (Fall 2015) consolidated lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)