How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exceptional subscheme of a blowup
Definition
Let be a scheme, let be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf (Quasi-coherent ideal sheaves) with zero scheme , the closed subscheme cut out by (Closed immersions of schemes), and let be the blowup of Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf. The exceptional subscheme of the blowup is the scheme-theoretic inverse image
of Scheme-theoretic inverse images of subschemes (Base change of objects, morphisms and properties); it is a closed subscheme , its ideal sheaf is the inverse image ideal , and the structural morphism of the blowup restricts to a morphism . Set-theoretically, is the preimage of the underlying set of .
Remarks
For an ideal not of finite type, the notation here extends Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf by using directly. Its graded algebra is quasi-coherent by the affine ideal-power calculation of Rees algebra sheaf of a finite type ideal, and no finite generation is required by Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra.
- The exceptional subscheme is defined for every quasi-coherent ideal sheaf on ; no smoothness of , regularity of , or invertibility of is assumed.
- The construction inherits the Axiom of Choice from the blowup (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf), and no further data is chosen.
- Nothing is asserted here about the components of , its codimension in the blowup, or the invertibility of its ideal sheaf; those are supplied by later items of this page.
Depends on
Used by
- Strict transform of a closed subscheme Definition
- Exceptional divisor of the blowup of A³ at the origin is P² Example
- The intersection form of the blown-up projective plane Example
- A point blowup drops pairwise intersection multiplicity by at least one Lemma
- Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional curves at two-dimensional local rings Lemma
- The blowup is an isomorphism off the center Lemma
- The blowup of a one-dimensional integral Noetherian scheme at a closed point is finite Lemma
- The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme Lemma
- The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface Lemma
- Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor Lemma
- Blowing up replaces the center by its projectivized normal directions Remark
- Embedded strict-normal-crossings resolution of a reduced curve on a regular surface Theorem
- The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone Theorem
- The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier Theorem
- Universal property of the blowup Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Divisors, Sections 31.33-31.36 (Blowing up; Strict transform; Admissible blowups; Blowing up and flatness) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, June 27, 2011 draft (author-hosted 'Early (out-of-date) version of The Rising Sea') (standard reference, not scraped)