Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exceptional subscheme of a blowup

Definition

Let X be a scheme, let I⊆OX be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf (Quasi-coherent ideal sheaves) with zero scheme Z=V(I)↪X, the closed subscheme cut out by I (Closed immersions of schemes), and let π ⁣:Bl⁡IX→X be the blowup of Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf. The exceptional subscheme of the blowup is the scheme-theoretic inverse image

E:=π−1(Z)=Z×XBl⁡IX

of Scheme-theoretic inverse images of subschemes (Base change of objects, morphisms and properties); it is a closed subscheme E↪Bl⁡IX, its ideal sheaf is the inverse image ideal IOBl⁡IX:=Im⁡(π∗I→OBl⁡IX), and the structural morphism of the blowup restricts to a morphism E→Z. Set-theoretically, E is the preimage π−1(Z) of the underlying set of Z.

Remarks

For an ideal not of finite type, the notation here extends Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf by using Proj⁡X(⨁n≥0In) directly. Its graded algebra is quasi-coherent by the affine ideal-power calculation of Rees algebra sheaf of a finite type ideal, and no finite generation is required by Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra.

  • The exceptional subscheme is defined for every quasi-coherent ideal sheaf I on X; no smoothness of X, regularity of Z, or invertibility of I is assumed.
  • The construction inherits the Axiom of Choice from the blowup (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf), and no further data is chosen.
  • Nothing is asserted here about the components of E, its codimension in the blowup, or the invertibility of its ideal sheaf; those are supplied by later items of this page.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources