How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Blowing up replaces the center by its projectivized normal directions
Remark
A blowup is not the deletion of the center. Let be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type on a scheme with zero scheme , and let be the blowup of Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf, with exceptional subscheme (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup). Then:
- is proper over (Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper); no properness of the base over a field or global H-projective embedding is required;
- is an isomorphism over the open complement (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center). It can also be an isomorphism over the center: an effective Cartier center has identity blowup, as is seen on its single principal regular chart;
- the pullback ideal is invertible (The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier), so after the blowup the center is an effective Cartier divisor and further blowups along it do nothing;
- the center is replaced, not deleted: is identified with the projectivized normal cone (The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone), so the points of lying over record the normal directions to at . For a closed point center on a regular finite-type surface of pure dimension two over a field this is a projective line over the residue field, , and the blowup stays a regular surface (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field).
Surjectivity is part of the same picture but carries a hypothesis. If the center is empty () then is an isomorphism; if vanishes identically on an open set, then the blowup has empty fibres over that set, so no unconditional surjectivity holds. In the integral finite-type situations used on this page, a nonzero center ideal has a nonempty dense complement. The proper image of the blowup is closed and contains that complement, hence is all of . Thus every fiber is nonempty, including the projectivized normal-cone fibers over the center.
Finally, strict transforms record how subvarieties approach the center: a closed subscheme has strict transform (Strict transform of a closed subscheme) cut out on the standard affine charts by the saturation of the pullback of its ideal by a local equation of the center, so parts supported entirely in the exceptional locus are removed. A subscheme contained in the center has empty strict transform; a single blowup need not separate all remaining branches.
Depends on
- Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf
- Exceptional subscheme of a blowup
- The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier
- The blowup is an isomorphism off the center
- The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone
- Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper
- Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field
- Strict transform of a closed subscheme
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, June 27, 2011 draft (author-hosted 'Early (out-of-date) version of The Rising Sea') (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Divisors, Sections 31.33-31.36 (Blowing up; Strict transform; Admissible blowups; Blowing up and flatness) (standard reference, not scraped)