Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the relative Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a scheme, let I be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type on X (Quasi-coherent ideal sheaves) and let π ⁣:Bl⁡IX→X be the blowup of Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf. Then:

  1. π is locally H-projective on X: for every affine open U=Spec⁡A with I∣U=(f0,…,fr), the pullback of the graded surjection A[x0,…,xr]→R(I∣U), xi↦fit, exhibits π−1(U) as a closed subscheme of PUr.
  2. If I is generated as an OX-module by finitely many global sections f0,…,fr (Global generation by the evaluation map), then the same surjection OX[x0,…,xr]→R(I) makes Bl⁡IX a closed subscheme of PXr over X; in particular π is H-projective (Projective morphisms before Proj).
  3. In all cases π is proper, since properness is local on the base and each π−1(U)→U is H-projective hence proper.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A scheme X, a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf I of finite type, the blowup π ⁣:Bl⁡IX=Proj⁡XR(I)→X (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf), and for an affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆X the restricted ideal I=Γ(U,I) with affine blowup algebras A[I/a].

[F1]

Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals: For a commutative ring A and a homogeneous ideal J⊆A[x0,…,xr] one has V+(J)=Proj⁡(A[x0,…,xr]/J) as a closed subscheme of PAr, and on the chart D+(xi) it is Spec⁡(A[x0,…,xr](xi)/J(xi)); every closed subscheme of PAr arises from a unique saturated homogeneous ideal.

[F2]

Affine-local graded algebras glue their Proj charts: The relative Proj of a quasi-coherent graded OX-algebra is obtained by gluing the spectra Proj⁡Γ(U,A) over affine opens U⊆X, with canonical restriction and cocycle identifications.

[F3]

Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps and Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains: For I=(f0,…,fr) the standard opens D+(fit)=Spec⁡A[I/fi] cover Bl⁡ISpec⁡A, and the chart presentations are independent of the chosen generating family; for U⊆X affine there is a canonical identification π−1(U)≅Bl⁡I∣UU (Blowups restrict to open subschemes of the base).

[F4]

Global generation by the evaluation map: A quasi-coherent sheaf I is generated by global sections f0,…,fr∈Γ(X,I) exactly when the evaluation morphism OX r+1→I, (g0,…,gr)↦∑igifi, is surjective.

[F5]

Projective morphisms are proper and Properness is local on the target: An H-projective morphism is proper, and properness is local on an open cover of the base.

[F6]

Closed immersions of schemes and Quasi-coherent module on a scheme: A morphism i is a closed immersion when it is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset and O→i∗O is surjective; both conditions are local on the target, and kernels of morphisms of quasi-coherent modules are quasi-coherent.

Proof

1.1F1F3

Let U=Spec⁡A⊆X be affine and let f0,…,fr∈A generate I=Γ(U,I). The graded A-algebra homomorphism φ ⁣:A[x0,…,xr]→R(I), xi↦fit, is surjective, because in degree n the images fαtn of the monomials xα of degree n generate Intn; hence by [F1] it presents Proj⁡R(I)=Bl⁡IU≅π−1(U) as the closed subscheme V+(ker⁡φ)↪PUr over U, which is assertion 1.

1.2F1F4

If I is generated by global sections f0,…,fr, then the evaluation morphism OX r+1→I is surjective by [F4], and consequently the induced morphism of graded OX-algebras ψ ⁣:OX[x0,…,xr]→R(I), xi↦fit, is surjective in every degree, because in degree n its image is the subsheaf generated by the products of n of the global sections, which is In by hypothesis.

2.1F2step 1.1step 1.2

Assume the global generation of step 1.2. On every affine open U⊆X the restriction of ψ is the surjection φ of step 1.1 for the restricted generators, so by step 1.1 the morphisms π−1(U)→PUr⊆PXr are closed immersions over U; these affine-local morphisms agree on overlaps because they are induced by the restrictions of the single graded morphism ψ and the identifications of [F2] are canonical, so they glue to a morphism Bl⁡IX→PXr over X.

3.1F6step 2.1

The glued morphism of step 2.1 is a closed immersion: surjectivity of the structure map of sheaves is checked on stalks, and a subset of PXr whose traces on the members of an open cover are closed is closed, so both conditions of [F6] are affine-local and hold because each restriction is a closed immersion; hence Bl⁡IX is a closed subscheme of PXr over X, and π is H-projective by Projective morphisms before Proj, which is assertion 2.

4.1F5step 1.1∎

For every affine open U⊆X the restriction π−1(U)→U is a closed subscheme of PUr over U by step 1.1, hence H-projective and therefore proper by [F5]; since properness is local on an open cover of the base by [F5], the morphism π itself is proper, which is assertion 3, and it holds whether or not I is globally generated.

Remarks

  • Assertion 1 holds for an arbitrary finite type ideal sheaf; assertion 2 needs the stronger hypothesis that the ideal is generated by finitely many global sections, and it is this case that produces a globally defined closed immersion into relative projective space.
  • The properness in assertion 3 is the only part used in the sequel for valuative arguments and for the direct image computations on an affine base; the local H-projectivity is used to read off charts.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources