Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Affine-local graded algebras glue their Proj charts

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the affine-scheme constructions (The Axiom of Choice). Let S be a scheme and let A=⨁d≥0Ad be a quasi-coherent graded OS-algebra. For an affine open U=Spec⁡R⊆S write A∣U≅B~ for the associated graded R-algebra B=⨁d≥0Γ(U,Ad).

Then for every affine open V⊆U the restriction Proj⁡(B)∣V is canonically isomorphic, over V, to Proj⁡Γ(V,A), where Γ(V,A)=⨁d≥0Γ(V,Ad) is the graded ring of sections; the isomorphisms are compatible with inclusions V′⊆V of affine opens and with the affine charts, and on triple overlaps of affine opens the cocycles are the identity. Consequently the local schemes Proj⁡Γ(U,A) glue over the affine opens U⊆S to a scheme over S, after restriction along each affine open, with all identifications canonical.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A scheme S, a quasi-coherent graded OS-algebra A=⨁d≥0Ad, affine opens V⊆U=Spec⁡R⊆S, and the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the affine constructions.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1]

On an affine scheme U=Spec⁡R, quasi-coherent modules are canonically the associated sheaves of their global sections. Applying this degreewise gives Ad∣U=Bd~, where Bd=Γ(U,Ad). The multiplication on B is the multiplication of sections; its associated multiplication agrees with that of A because on each distinguished open sections are fractions and products multiply their numerators and denominators. (Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules)

[F2]

Let W=Spec⁡C be an affine open subscheme of Spec⁡A and M an A-module; then the restriction of M~ to W is canonically (C⊗AM)~, and W need not be a distinguished open. (An associated sheaf restricts to an associated sheaf on an affine open)

[F3]

Fibre products of schemes exist, and the fibre product of two open immersions with common target is their intersection, with the fibre product of Spec⁡R′ and Spec⁡R′′ over Spec⁡R equal to Spec⁡(R′⊗RR′′). (Existence of all scheme fibre products)

[F4]

For homogeneous f∈B+ of positive degree, Proj⁡B has the affine chart D+(f)=Spec⁡B(f) with B(f)=(B[f−1])0, and these charts as f varies form a basis; on D+(fg) the two charts are identified by the canonical comparison of localisations. (Proj carries a scheme structure)

[L1]

Localisation commutes with scalar extension and taking a graded component: for an R-algebra C placed in degree zero and a homogeneous f∈B, the maps (b/fk)⊗c⟼(b⊗c)/fCk give a graded isomorphism Bf⊗RC≅(B⊗RC)fC. Indeed, both algebras represent a compatible map from B and C in which the image of f is invertible; the displayed maps and their inverses are forced by those maps and are inverse on generators. Tensor product distributes over the direct sum of homogeneous components, so its degree-zero restriction is B(f)⊗RC≅(B⊗RC)(fC). The same fraction maps commute with further localisation and scalar extension.

[F6]

Compatible open gluing data for affine schemes produce a scheme uniquely up to unique isomorphism respecting the given charts. (Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms)

Proof

technique · direct: compute the local model $\widetilde{B\otimes_RC}$ of $\mathcal A$ on an affine open $V=\operatorname{Spec}C$, match its projective charts with the restrictions of the charts of $\operatorname{Proj}B$, and check the cocycle conditions by locality of the localisation formulas
1.1F1F2algebra

Local graded model on V. Let C=Γ(V,OU), so that V=Spec⁡C and the inclusion is induced by R→C; by [F1] the graded algebra A∣U is B~ for the graded R-algebra B=⨁dΓ(U,Ad), and by [F2] applied degreewise, Γ(V,Ad)=C⊗RBd with compatible products, so that Γ(V,A)=B⊗RC as a graded C-algebra; write BC=B⊗RC with (BC)d=Bd⊗RC.

2.1F1F3F4L1step 1.1

Intersections of charts with V. Let f∈B+ be homogeneous of positive degree, so D+(f)⊆Proj⁡B is an affine open chart [F4], and let fC denote its image in BC. The inverse image of V in D+(f) is the fibre product of the affine morphism D+(f)=Spec⁡B(f)→U=Spec⁡R with the open immersion V=Spec⁡C↪U. By [F3] it is affine with ring B(f)⊗RC, which by [L1] is (BC)(fC); hence D+(f)∩π−1(V)=Spec⁡((BC)(fC)) is exactly a standard chart of Proj⁡BC=Proj⁡Γ(V,A).

3.1F4F6step 2.1algebra

Chartwise isomorphism. The opens D+(fC) for homogeneous f∈B+ cover Proj⁡BC: if a homogeneous prime contained all f⊗1, it would contain every positive-degree element ∑jbj⊗cj, contradicting its membership in Proj. The assignment D+(f)∩V↦Spec⁡(BC)(fC) is the identity on rings, so for all f it identifies the charts of Proj⁡(B)∣V with the charts of Proj⁡Γ(V,A); the two transition systems are induced by the same canonical localisation maps B(f)→B(fg) and B(g)→B(fg) base changed along R→C, hence agree, and by [F6] the chart identifications glue to an isomorphism Proj⁡(B)∣V→Proj⁡Γ(V,A) over V, canonical because each chart identification is.

4.1L1step 3.1algebra

Compatibility with inclusions of affine opens. If V′⊆V are affine open in U with rings C→C′, then the isomorphism of step 3.1 for V′ is the restriction of the one for V: on a chart, both are the base change of the identity map of B(f) along R→C→C′, and base change of localisations is compatible with composition by [L1].

5.1F6step 3.1step 4.1cases: triple overlap

Gluing over S and triple overlaps. Let U,U′,U′′ be affine opens of S and let W⊆U∩U′ be an affine open; both restrictions Proj⁡Γ(U,A)∣W and Proj⁡Γ(U′,A)∣W are identified with Proj⁡Γ(W,A) by step 3.1 (applied with V=W), and the resulting isomorphism over W composes to the identity on triple overlaps W⊆U∩U′∩U′′ by step 4.1, because all identifications are the canonical localisation isomorphisms for the graded rings of sections. Since the affine opens W cover each intersection U∩U′, the local isomorphisms glue; refining the local schemes to their standard affine charts and applying [F6], the local schemes Proj⁡Γ(U,A) therefore glue over the affine opens of S, and the identifications are canonical throughout.

6.1

Conclusion. Step 3.1 gives the canonical isomorphism Proj⁡(B)∣V≅Proj⁡Γ(V,A) for every affine open V⊆U, step 4.1 its compatibility with inclusions, and step 5.1 the triple-overlap cocycle and the gluing conclusion. The Axiom of Choice [A1] is inherited only through the affine quasi-coherence equivalence [F1] and the associated-sheaf restriction [F2]; no additional choice is made. [A1, F1, F2, step 3.1, step 5.1] \qed

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources