How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Affine-local graded algebras glue their Proj charts
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the affine-scheme constructions (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a scheme and let be a quasi-coherent graded -algebra. For an affine open write for the associated graded -algebra .
Then for every affine open the restriction is canonically isomorphic, over , to , where is the graded ring of sections; the isomorphisms are compatible with inclusions of affine opens and with the affine charts, and on triple overlaps of affine opens the cocycles are the identity. Consequently the local schemes glue over the affine opens to a scheme over , after restriction along each affine open, with all identifications canonical.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A scheme , a quasi-coherent graded -algebra , affine opens , and the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the affine constructions.
The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)
On an affine scheme , quasi-coherent modules are canonically the associated sheaves of their global sections. Applying this degreewise gives , where . The multiplication on is the multiplication of sections; its associated multiplication agrees with that of because on each distinguished open sections are fractions and products multiply their numerators and denominators. (Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules)
Let be an affine open subscheme of and an -module; then the restriction of to is canonically , and need not be a distinguished open. (An associated sheaf restricts to an associated sheaf on an affine open)
Fibre products of schemes exist, and the fibre product of two open immersions with common target is their intersection, with the fibre product of and over equal to . (Existence of all scheme fibre products)
For homogeneous of positive degree, has the affine chart with , and these charts as varies form a basis; on the two charts are identified by the canonical comparison of localisations. (Proj carries a scheme structure)
Localisation commutes with scalar extension and taking a graded component: for an -algebra placed in degree zero and a homogeneous , the maps give a graded isomorphism . Indeed, both algebras represent a compatible map from and in which the image of is invertible; the displayed maps and their inverses are forced by those maps and are inverse on generators. Tensor product distributes over the direct sum of homogeneous components, so its degree-zero restriction is . The same fraction maps commute with further localisation and scalar extension.
Compatible open gluing data for affine schemes produce a scheme uniquely up to unique isomorphism respecting the given charts. (Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms)
Proof
Local graded model on . Let , so that and the inclusion is induced by ; by [F1] the graded algebra is for the graded -algebra , and by [F2] applied degreewise, with compatible products, so that as a graded -algebra; write with .
Intersections of charts with . Let be homogeneous of positive degree, so is an affine open chart [F4], and let denote its image in . The inverse image of in is the fibre product of the affine morphism with the open immersion . By [F3] it is affine with ring , which by [L1] is ; hence is exactly a standard chart of .
Chartwise isomorphism. The opens for homogeneous cover : if a homogeneous prime contained all , it would contain every positive-degree element , contradicting its membership in Proj. The assignment is the identity on rings, so for all it identifies the charts of with the charts of ; the two transition systems are induced by the same canonical localisation maps and base changed along , hence agree, and by [F6] the chart identifications glue to an isomorphism over , canonical because each chart identification is.
Compatibility with inclusions of affine opens. If are affine open in with rings , then the isomorphism of step 3.1 for is the restriction of the one for : on a chart, both are the base change of the identity map of along , and base change of localisations is compatible with composition by [L1].
Gluing over and triple overlaps. Let be affine opens of and let be an affine open; both restrictions and are identified with by step 3.1 (applied with ), and the resulting isomorphism over composes to the identity on triple overlaps by step 4.1, because all identifications are the canonical localisation isomorphisms for the graded rings of sections. Since the affine opens cover each intersection , the local isomorphisms glue; refining the local schemes to their standard affine charts and applying [F6], the local schemes therefore glue over the affine opens of , and the identifications are canonical throughout.
Conclusion. Step 3.1 gives the canonical isomorphism for every affine open , step 4.1 its compatibility with inclusions, and step 5.1 the triple-overlap cocycle and the gluing conclusion. The Axiom of Choice [A1] is inherited only through the affine quasi-coherence equivalence [F1] and the associated-sheaf restriction [F2]; no additional choice is made. [A1, F1, F2, step 3.1, step 5.1] \qed
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Constructions of Schemes, Sections 27.8-27.21 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, 29 August 2022, Sections 4.5, 7.4, 9.3, 10.6, 17.4, 17.6, 18.2 (standard reference, not scraped)