How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative ampleness over an arbitrary base
Definition
Let be a morphism of schemes and let be an invertible -module (Invertible sheaves). Suppose first that is quasi-compact (Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms). Then is -ample, or ample relative to , when for every affine open subscheme the restriction is an ample invertible sheaf on the scheme in the absolute sense of Absolute ampleness by affine section opens.
The definition is well posed: is quasi-compact because is quasi-compact and is quasi-compact (being affine), so the scheme satisfies the quasi-compactness clause required of an ample invertible sheaf, and ampleness of the restriction is then a condition on the affine nonvanishing loci of its positive powers. The empty scheme is allowed on both sides: if the restriction is ample vacuously, and if the condition is vacuous.
Remarks
- Affine base. If is affine, then and the single condition on says that is ample on in the absolute sense; so for an affine base -ampleness is exactly ampleness of Absolute ampleness by affine section opens, with no extra hypothesis beyond quasi-compactness of , which for an affine base is the quasi-compactness of .
- Nonaffine base. The definition is stated for every affine open of precisely because over a nonaffine base a globally ample -module need not have ample restriction to every open subscheme; relative ampleness is a hypothesis on the restrictions, not on itself.
- Relation to relative very ampleness. Under the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), H-very ampleness relative to is defined at Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention and implies -ampleness by Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness; the converse fails in general, and the sufficient criterion in the proper, finite-type, Noetherian case is High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Definition 29.38.1 (Tag 01VG) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, August 2022 draft, Section 17.6 (standard reference, not scraped)