How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Base change of objects, morphisms and properties
Definition
Let . For an -scheme , its base change is , with structure map the second projection. For an -morphism , define by its projections and . Existence and uniqueness follow from Existence of all scheme fibre products; the meaning of -morphism is Schemes and morphisms over a base. These formulas preserve identities and composition because their projections do, so they define a functor. A property of morphisms is stable under arbitrary base change when every pullback of a morphism with that property again has it. No restriction such as flatness is implicit in “arbitrary”.
Depends on
Used by
- Euler characteristic in a proper flat family is locally constant Corollary
- Nontrivial degree-zero line bundles have no sections Corollary
- Upper semicontinuity of fibre cohomology dimensions Corollary
- Nonflat base change of a blowup can fail Counterexample
- The affine line is not proper Counterexample
- Exceptional subscheme of a blowup Definition
- Group schemes over a base scheme Definition
- Open and universally open morphisms of schemes Definition
- Scheme-theoretic fibre Definition
- Universally closed morphisms Definition
- Incidence projection has closed determinantal image Example
- Affine charts after extension of the ground field Lemma
- Base change and products of abelian schemes Lemma
- Base change of immersions Lemma
- Blowups restrict to open subschemes of the base Lemma
- Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change Lemma
- Étale stability Lemma
- Fibres of a smooth morphism are smooth Lemma
- Finite projective complex for proper flat coherent cohomology Lemma
- Flatness is stable under arbitrary base change Lemma
- Fpqc descent of properness components Lemma
- Good reduction is stable under base change of the base Lemma
- Iterated base change Lemma
- Morphisms from a proper scheme to a separated one are proper Lemma
- Properness survives composition Lemma
- Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness Lemma
- Separatedness survives base change Lemma
- The submersion criterion between smooth varieties Lemma
- Universal finite projective cohomology complex over any base Lemma
- Valuation lifts detect universal closedness Lemma
- Cohomology and base change for proper flat coherent families Theorem
- Flat base change for blowups, and failure without flatness Theorem
- Flat finite-presentation morphisms are open Theorem
- Proper morphisms are closed Theorem
- Properness descends through fpqc base change Theorem
- Relative Proj commutes with arbitrary base change Theorem
- Smoothness survives base change and composition Theorem
- Submersion criterion for locally standard smooth morphisms Theorem
- The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks 26.18.1 and 26.18.3 (standard reference, not scraped)