How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Separatedness survives base change
Statement
Let be a separated morphism and let be any morphism. Then the base change is separated. No quasi-compactness, Noetherian or finite-type hypothesis is used, and or may be empty.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A separated morphism , an arbitrary morphism , and the base change with structure morphism .
A morphism is separated when is a closed immersion. (Separated morphism of schemes)
For and there is a canonical isomorphism ; under it is the base change of , and the square with the two diagonals and the projections to and is Cartesian. (The diagonal commutes with base change)
Closed immersions remain closed immersions after arbitrary base change; this holds with no flatness or finiteness hypothesis and includes the empty and zero-ring cases. (Base change of immersions)
The base change carries the second projection as structure morphism, and the base change of an -morphism is defined by its two projections. (Base change of objects, morphisms and properties)
Proof
The morphism is with as in [F4], and [F2] supplies the canonical isomorphism together with the Cartesian square comparing the two diagonals over and .
Since is separated, [F1] says that is a closed immersion.
Under the identification of step 1.1 the diagonal is the base change of along the projection , by the second assertion of [F2].
By [F3] the base change of the closed immersion is again a closed immersion; with step 2.1 this exhibits as a closed immersion, and the empty or zero-ring case is covered by the same statement.
By [F1] the morphism is separated, which is the assertion.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Schemes, Lemma 26.21.12, printed p.41 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vakil, The Rising Sea, Section 11.3.3, printed p.308 (standard reference, not scraped)