Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Separatedness survives base change

Statement

Let f:X→S be a separated morphism and let g:S′→S be any morphism. Then the base change f′:X×SS′→S′ is separated. No quasi-compactness, Noetherian or finite-type hypothesis is used, and S′ or X may be empty.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A separated morphism f:X→S, an arbitrary morphism g:S′→S, and the base change X′=X×SS′ with structure morphism f′:X′→S′.

[F1]

A morphism f:X→S is separated when ΔX/S is a closed immersion. (Separated morphism of schemes)

[F2]

For g:S′→S and X→S there is a canonical isomorphism X′×S′X′≅(X×SX)×SS′; under it ΔX′/S′ is the base change of ΔX/S, and the square with the two diagonals and the projections to X and X×SX is Cartesian. (The diagonal commutes with base change)

[F3]

Closed immersions remain closed immersions after arbitrary base change; this holds with no flatness or finiteness hypothesis and includes the empty and zero-ring cases. (Base change of immersions)

[F4]

The base change XS′=X×SS′ carries the second projection as structure morphism, and the base change of an S-morphism is defined by its two projections. (Base change of objects, morphisms and properties)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The morphism f′ is X′→S′ with X′=X×SS′ as in [F4], and [F2] supplies the canonical isomorphism X′×S′X′≅(X×SX)×SS′ together with the Cartesian square comparing the two diagonals over X and X×SX.

F2F4given
1.2

Since f is separated, [F1] says that ΔX/S is a closed immersion.

F1given
2.1

Under the identification of step 1.1 the diagonal ΔX′/S′:X′→X′×S′X′ is the base change of ΔX/S along the projection (X×SX)×SS′→X×SX, by the second assertion of [F2].

F2step 1.1
3.1

By [F3] the base change of the closed immersion ΔX/S is again a closed immersion; with step 2.1 this exhibits ΔX′/S′ as a closed immersion, and the empty or zero-ring case is covered by the same statement.

F3step 2.1step 1.2
4.1

By [F1] the morphism f′:X′→S′ is separated, which is the assertion.

F1step 3.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources