How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The affine line is not proper
Statement refuted
For every field , the structure morphism is proper.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the multiplicative subset , the localisation with fraction field , and the morphism induced by .
A morphism of schemes is proper if and only if it is separated, of finite type, and universally closed. (Proper morphisms)
A morphism is universally closed if for every -scheme the base-changed projection is a closed map; explicitly the image of every closed subset of is closed in . (Universally closed morphisms)
For a commutative ring , the points of are the prime ideals, is a basic open, and the sets are the closed sets. (The underlying space of an affine spectrum, The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum)
For a prime ideal of a commutative ring , the localisation is a nonzero local ring whose unique maximal ideal is and whose units are exactly the fractions with . ( is local with unique maximal ideal )
In a localisation, if and only if for some in the multiplicative set. (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map)
If is an integral domain then so is ; in particular is a domain for a field . (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain, The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution)
For ring maps and there is a canonical isomorphism over . (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products)
For and an -scheme , the base change is with structure map the second projection (Base change of objects, morphisms and properties).
For a base scheme the relative affine space has over ; in particular with structure morphism induced by . (Schemes and morphisms over a base)
Counterexample
The multiplicative set contains no zero divisors of , and is a domain by [F6], so [F5] shows that the localisation map is injective; hence is a domain and is a prime of . Since is a prime disjoint from , [F4] shows that is a local ring with unique maximal ideal , and is therefore not a unit of . In particular contains the two points and .
By [F9], over , and is the morphism induced by the field map . The canonical map , , is an isomorphism of -algebras because is the free -module with basis ; hence [F7] identifies the base change with , with projection induced by . By [F8] this is exactly the base change of along .
Let be the closed subset defined by the element . We compute its image. If is a prime containing and if , then , a contradiction; so and . Conversely, let be a prime of and let be the -algebra map sending to the inverse of the image of , which is legitimate because . Its kernel is prime, contains , and satisfies because the composite has kernel . Hence the image of under the base-changed projection of step 1.2 is exactly the basic open .
The subset is open but not closed. It is nonempty because by step 1.1, and it is not all of because the maximal ideal contains and so lies outside . If were closed, then by [F3] it would equal for the radical ideal ; from we get , hence , hence , a contradiction. Therefore , whose image of the closed subset is by step 2.1, is not a closed map.
By [F2] and step 1.2, a nonclosed base-changed projection exhibits a failure of universal closedness of , so that morphism is not universally closed and hence not proper by [F1]. The morphism is nevertheless of finite type and separated, being affine, so the failure is exactly in universal closedness. No choice principle is used: the prime witnessing nonclosedness is the maximal ideal , and the prime making nonempty is . Equivalently, the point has no -lift, since a compatible -point would give a -algebra map with while because is not a unit of by step 1.1.
Depends on
- Proper morphisms
- Universally closed morphisms
- The underlying space of an affine spectrum
- The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum
- $R_{\mathfrak p}$ is local with unique maximal ideal $\mathfrak pR_{\mathfrak p}$
- Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map
- A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain
- Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products
- Base change of objects, morphisms and properties
- Schemes and morphisms over a base
- The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Section 29.41 and Example 29.42.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vakil, The Rising Sea, §11.3.1 and Exercise 11.3.A (standard reference, not scraped)