Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The affine line is not proper

Statement refuted

For every field k, the structure morphism Ak1=Spec⁡k[x]→Spec⁡k is proper.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the multiplicative subset S=k[t]∖(t)⊆k[t], the localisation R=k[t](t)=S−1k[t] with fraction field K=k(t), and the morphism Spec⁡R→Spec⁡k induced by k↪R.

[F1]

A morphism of schemes is proper if and only if it is separated, of finite type, and universally closed. (Proper morphisms)

[F2]

A morphism f:X→S is universally closed if for every S-scheme T the base-changed projection fT:X×ST→T is a closed map; explicitly the image of every closed subset of ∣XT∣ is closed in ∣T∣. (Universally closed morphisms)

[F3]

For a commutative ring A, the points of Spec⁡A are the prime ideals, D(f)={p:f∉p} is a basic open, and the sets V(I)={p:I⊆p} are the closed sets. (The underlying space of an affine spectrum, The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum)

[F4]

For a prime ideal p of a commutative ring A, the localisation Ap is a nonzero local ring whose unique maximal ideal is pAp and whose units are exactly the fractions r/s with r∉p. (Rp is local with unique maximal ideal pRp)

[F5]

In a localisation, r/1=0 if and only if sr=0 for some s in the multiplicative set. (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map)

[F7]

For ring maps A→B and A→C there is a canonical isomorphism Spec⁡B×Spec⁡ASpec⁡C≅Spec⁡(B⊗AC) over Spec⁡A. (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products)

[F8]

For h:S′→S and an S-scheme X, the base change is XS′=X×SS′ with structure map the second projection (Base change of objects, morphisms and properties).

[F9]

For a base scheme S the relative affine space AS1 has ASpec⁡A1=Spec⁡A[x] over Spec⁡A; in particular Ak1=Spec⁡k[x] with structure morphism induced by k↪k[x]. (Schemes and morphisms over a base)

Counterexample

1.1F4F5F6

The multiplicative set S contains no zero divisors of k[t], and k[t] is a domain by [F6], so [F5] shows that the localisation map k[t]→R is injective; hence R is a domain and (0) is a prime of R. Since (t)⊆k[t] is a prime disjoint from S, [F4] shows that R is a local ring with unique maximal ideal m=tR, and t∈m is therefore not a unit of R. In particular Spec⁡R contains the two points (0) and m.

1.2F7F8F9

By [F9], Ak1=Spec⁡k[x] over S0=Spec⁡k, and Spec⁡R→S0 is the morphism induced by the field map k→R. The canonical map k[x]⊗kR→R[x], xi⊗r↦rxi, is an isomorphism of R-algebras because k[x] is the free k-module with basis xi; hence [F7] identifies the base change Ak1×S0Spec⁡R with Spec⁡R[x], with projection q:Spec⁡R[x]→Spec⁡R induced by R↪R[x]. By [F8] this q is exactly the base change of Ak1→Spec⁡k along Spec⁡R→Spec⁡k.

2.1F3step 1.2

Let Z=V(tx−1)⊆Spec⁡R[x] be the closed subset defined by the element tx−1. We compute its image. If P∈Z is a prime containing tx−1 and if t∈P∩R, then tx−(tx−1)=1∈P, a contradiction; so t∉P∩R and P∩R∈D(t). Conversely, let q∈D(t) be a prime of R and let ψ:R[x]→Frac⁡(R/q) be the R-algebra map sending x to the inverse of the image of t, which is legitimate because t∉q. Its kernel P is prime, contains tx−1, and satisfies P∩R=q because the composite R→Frac⁡(R/q) has kernel q. Hence the image of Z under the base-changed projection q of step 1.2 is exactly the basic open D(t)⊆Spec⁡R.

3.1F3step 1.1step 2.1

The subset D(t) is open but not closed. It is nonempty because (0)∈D(t) by step 1.1, and it is not all of Spec⁡R because the maximal ideal m=tR contains t and so lies outside D(t). If D(t) were closed, then by [F3] it would equal V(I) for the radical ideal I; from (0)∈V(I) we get I⊆(0), hence I=0, hence V(I)=Spec⁡R≠D(t), a contradiction. Therefore q, whose image of the closed subset Z is D(t) by step 2.1, is not a closed map.

4.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2step 3.1∎

By [F2] and step 1.2, a nonclosed base-changed projection exhibits a failure of universal closedness of Ak1→Spec⁡k, so that morphism is not universally closed and hence not proper by [F1]. The morphism is nevertheless of finite type and separated, being affine, so the failure is exactly in universal closedness. No choice principle is used: the prime witnessing nonclosedness is the maximal ideal tR, and the prime making D(t) nonempty is (0). Equivalently, the point x=1/t∈K has no R-lift, since a compatible R-point would give a k-algebra map k[x]→R with x↦1/t while 1/t∉R because t is not a unit of R by step 1.1.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources