Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonflat base change of a blowup can fail

Statement refuted

False claim: the flatness hypothesis in Flat base change for blowups, and failure without flatness can be dropped, i.e. for every morphism g ⁣:X′→X and every quasi-coherent ideal sheaf I of finite type the canonical comparison morphism Bl⁡g−1IX′→Bl⁡IX×XX′ is an isomorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The polynomial ring A=k[x,y] over a field k, the maximal ideal I=(x,y), the quotient g ⁣:A→B=A/(y)=k[x], the ideal g−1I=(x)⊆B, the Rees algebras R(I)=⨁n≥0Intn and R(Bx), the blowups Bl⁡ISpec⁡A and Bl⁡(x)Spec⁡B (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf, Rees algebra sheaf of a finite type ideal), and the base change Bl⁡ISpec⁡A×Spec⁡ASpec⁡B (Base change of objects, morphisms and properties).

[F1]

The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme: With homogeneous coordinates u,v on Pk1, the blowup of Ak2 at the origin is V(xv−yu)⊆Spec⁡A×Pk1, and its two charts are Spec⁡k[x,T] with T=v/u, y=xT, and Spec⁡k[y,U] with U=u/v, x=yU, glued by TU=1.

[F2]

Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps and Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains: The standard charts of a blowup Bl⁡(f)Spec⁡C along a principal ideal generated by a nonzerodivisor f are the spectra of the affine blowup algebras C[(f)/f]=C; they cover the blowup.

[F3]

Relative Proj commutes with arbitrary base change: The relative Proj base changes canonically along arbitrary morphisms, so Bl⁡ISpec⁡A×Spec⁡ASpec⁡B=Proj⁡B(g∗R(I)), and a morphism of graded algebras g∗R(I)→R(g−1I) induces the canonical comparison morphism of the Proj schemes.

[F4]

Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms: A ring map is flat when the target is flat as a module over the source, i.e. when tensoring by it preserves exact sequences.

Counterexample

1.1F4

The quotient g ⁣:A→B=A/(y) is not flat: the sequence 0→A→⋅yA→B→0 is exact because y is a nonzerodivisor of the polynomial ring A, so if B were flat over A the sequence 0→B→⋅yB→B→0 would be exact by [F4]; but y=0 in B, so the first map is the zero map with kernel B=k[x]≠0, and injectivity of the first map would force B=0, a contradiction.

1.2given

The comparison of Rees algebras is not an isomorphism. Its degree-two source is I2⊗AB=I2/yI2. The class of xy is nonzero: if xy=yh with h∈I2, cancellation of y in A would give x=h∈I2, a contradiction. It maps to zero in (IB)2=(x)2B and is killed by x, since x2y∈yI2. Thus it is a nonzero torsion kernel class. The generators x2,xy,y2 are not an A-basis; no freeness of I2 is used.

1.3F2

The source Bl⁡(x)Spec⁡B is Spec⁡B: the pullback ideal (x)⊆k[x] is principal generated by the nonzerodivisor x, and by [F2] its single standard chart is Spec⁡B[(x)/x]=Spec⁡B; since that chart covers the blowup, the blowup is the identity on Spec⁡B.

1.4F1F3

By relative Proj base change the target is T=Proj⁡B(B⊗AR(I)). The incidence presentation identifies it with V(xv)⊂PB1. Its two components are the section V(v)≅Spec⁡B and the closed fiber V(x)≅Pk1 over the origin. On D+(u) the ring is k[x,T]/(xT), with component ideals (T) and (x) and their intersection point (x,T). The other chart is k[U] with x=0, extending the latter affine-line piece to Pk1 and adding no further component. Thus the target has two irreducible components.

2.1F1F3step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4∎

The canonical comparison sends the ratio T=y/x to zero on the first chart, so its image is the section V(v). Its source is Spec⁡B by step 1.3. The source fiber over x=0 is Spec⁡k, while the target fiber is Pk1 by step 1.4; hence this morphism over Spec⁡B is not an isomorphism. This proves the failure without flatness, independently of any assertion that the degree-two generators form a basis.

Remarks

  • The failure is visible already in degree two of the Rees algebras, where the relation xy=0 in B cuts the quotient I2⊗AB down to (x)2B; the lost degree is exactly the torsion of the base change of the Rees algebra.
  • Geometrically, the source keeps only the strict transform of the axis, whereas the base-changed target retains the whole exceptional curve over the origin as an additional irreducible component.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources