Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Blowing up a rational point of a smooth surface

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let S be a smooth surface over a field k and let p∈S(k) be a k-rational point. Then the blowup S′=Bl⁡pS is smooth over k, with exceptional curve E≅Pk1 and OE(E)≅OPk1(−1) (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field). Choose a sufficiently small affine neighbourhood U=Spec⁡R of p and functions x,y∈R generating the ideal of p on U and giving regular parameters at p; such a choice exists. Over U the blowup is the incidence subscheme V(xv−yu)⊆U×kPk1, with homogeneous coordinates (u:v) on the second factor, its two charts are Spec⁡R[T]/(xT−y)=Spec⁡R[y/x] and Spec⁡R[U1]/(yU1−x)=Spec⁡R[x/y], and the overlap inverts T and U1 with TU1=1. After base change to Spec⁡OS,p, replace R by OS,p in these formulas. The charts over R are smooth surfaces over k, and the local rings on E have dimension one at its generic point and dimension two at its closed points. For S=Ak2 with coordinates x,y and p=0 the charts are the affine planes Spec⁡k[x,T] and Spec⁡k[y,U1], and the incidence subscheme lies in Ak2×kPk1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, a smooth surface S over k, a k-rational point p, the local ring A=OS,p, regular parameters xˉ,yˉ∈A, an affine neighbourhood U=Spec⁡R of p, lifts x,y∈R of xˉ,yˉ, the blowup π ⁣:S′→S of p, and the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Proj and gluing constructions (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Smooth morphism of schemes: S→Spec⁡k is smooth, hence flat, locally of finite presentation, and geometrically regular on the fibres; the fibre over the unique point of Spec⁡k is S itself, so every local ring of S is regular. Smoothness is local on the source.

[F2]

embedding dimension and regular local ring, regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay, regular local quotient by parameter is regular and localisations of regular local rings are regular: A is a regular local ring of dimension two, 2=dim⁡A=edim⁡A; regular local rings are domains and Cohen-Macaulay, their regular systems of parameters are regular sequences in any order, and A/(xˉ) is a regular local ring of dimension one, hence a domain.

[F3]

localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a regular Noetherian ring are regular, and regularity is tested at maximal ideals.

[F4]

Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps and Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains: For an ideal I=(f0,…,fr) the standard charts Spec⁡A[I/fi] cover Bl⁡ISpec⁡A, and the homomorphism A[x1,…,xr]/(axi−ai)→A[I/a] is surjective with kernel the a-power torsion; the image of a is a nonzerodivisor and (A[I/a])a=Aa.

[F5]

Blowups restrict to open subschemes of the base: On the open subscheme U the blowup of the point is the blowup of U along the restriction of the ideal sheaf of p; if (x,y) is the ideal of p on U, this is Bl⁡(x,y)U.

[F6]

Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms: Affine schemes with open subschemes and isomorphisms on overlaps satisfying the cocycle condition glue to a scheme, uniquely up to unique isomorphism respecting the charts.

[F7]

Standard opens of Proj and Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring: On Pk1=Proj⁡k[u,v] the standard opens D+(u) and D+(v) are the affine lines Spec⁡k[T], T=v/u, and Spec⁡k[U1], U1=u/v, glued by TU1=1.

[F8]

Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field: Bl⁡pS is regular of pure dimension two, E is an effective Cartier divisor isomorphic to Pκ(p)1=Pk1 with OE(E)=O(−1), the base change to Spec⁡A has charts Spec⁡A[T]/(xT−y) and Spec⁡A[U1]/(yU1−x) glued by TU1=1, the local rings on E have dimension one at the generic point and two at closed points, and if S is smooth over k and p is k-rational then Bl⁡pS is smooth over k.

[F9]

Pushforward and vanishing for an affine point blowup: For a ring A and I=(x,y) generated by a regular sequence, the two standard charts cover Bl⁡ISpec⁡A and, over the affine base, the structure-sheaf pushforward is the structure sheaf of the base with all higher direct images vanishing.

[F10]

The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme: Over k[x,y] the blowup of the origin is V(xv−yu)⊆Ak2×kPk1 with charts Spec⁡k[x,T], y=xT, and Spec⁡k[y,U1], x=yU1, glued by TU1=1.

[F11]

The blowup is an isomorphism off the center: The blowup is an isomorphism over the complement of the centre, so the descriptions over the open neighbourhood U glue to the global blowup.

Proof

1.1F1F2F5

By [F1] the local ring A=OS,p is regular, and by [F2] it has dimension and embedding dimension two, so there are regular parameters xˉ,yˉ; lifting them along R→Rmp=A and clearing denominators gives x,y∈R with these images, and the failure loci of the conditions below are closed subsets of the affine scheme U not containing p, so U may be shrunk while keeping p. Arrange that (i) U is connected and R is a domain: every local ring of the smooth surface S is a domain by [F1] and [F2], so a connected affine open neighbourhood of p has domain ring; (ii) (x,y) generates the ideal of p on U, which holds at p because the images generate mp and the locus where the two coherent ideals differ is closed and avoids p; (iii) (x,y) and (y,x) are regular sequences in R, namely x and y are nonzerodivisors and each is a nonzerodivisor modulo the other: this holds at p because xˉ,yˉ is a regular system of parameters in the Cohen-Macaulay ring A by [F2], and each failure is the support of the kernel of multiplication on a coherent module, a closed subset avoiding p. Thus a sufficiently small affine neighbourhood and functions as in the statement exist.

2.1F4F6F7step 1.1algebra

Let Z=V(xv−yu)⊆U×kPk1. By [F7] the two charts of the projective factor give Z∩{u≠0}=Spec⁡R[T]/(xT−y) with T=v/u, and Z∩{v≠0}=Spec⁡R[U1]/(yU1−x) with U1=u/v; on the overlap both T and U1 are invertible and TU1=1, so Z is obtained by gluing these two affine charts along R[T,T−1]/(xT−y). On the other hand, by [F4] the standard charts of Bl⁡(x,y)U are Spec⁡R[(x,y)/x] and Spec⁡R[(x,y)/y] with overlap R[(x,y)/x][x/y]. Since (x,y) is a regular sequence in the domain R by step 1.1, the homomorphism R[T]/(xT−y)→R[(x,y)/x], T↦y/x, is an isomorphism: it is surjective with kernel the x-power torsion by [F4], and a coefficient comparison in a relation xg=(xT−y)h, using that y is a nonzerodivisor modulo x, shows g∈(xT−y), so no nonzero torsion exists; symmetrically R[U1]/(yU1−x)≅R[(x,y)/y] via U1↦x/y. These identifications carry T↦y/x and U1↦x/y, matching the ratio identifications of the blowup charts, so by [F6] they glue to an isomorphism Z→Bl⁡(x,y)U over U, canonical because both sides are determined by the same chart data.

3.1F5F8F9step 2.1

By [F5] the restriction of the blowup of S at p to the open U is Bl⁡(x,y)U, so step 2.1 identifies it with the incidence subscheme V(xv−yu) and gives the two charts Spec⁡R[T]/(xT−y)=Spec⁡R[y/x] and Spec⁡R[U1]/(yU1−x)=Spec⁡R[x/y] with TU1=1, the descriptions displayed in the statement. Base change to Spec⁡A replaces R by A: the formulas Spec⁡A[T]/(xT−y) and Spec⁡A[U1]/(yU1−x) are exactly the local charts of [F8], and over this affine base the structure-sheaf pushforward is A with vanishing higher direct images by [F9].

4.1F1F2F3F8F10F11step 3.1

Smoothness and the local structure of E. Since S is smooth over k and p is k-rational, [F8] gives that Bl⁡pS is smooth over k with exceptional curve E≅Pk1 and OE(E)=O(−1), and that the local rings on E have dimension one at its generic point and two at closed points. The two charts of step 3.1 cover π−1(U) and are open subschemes of Bl⁡pS; smoothness is local on the source by [F1], so each chart is a smooth surface over k. The centre is a single point, so by [F11] the blowup is an isomorphism away from p, and the chart descriptions of steps 2.1 and 3.1 glue to the global blowup. In the model S=Ak2, p=0 with the coordinate functions x,y, [F10] gives literally Spec⁡k[x,T] and Spec⁡k[y,U1] inside Ak2×kPk1.

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Steps 1.1-4.1 prove the statement: a sufficiently small affine neighbourhood U=Spec⁡R with regular parameters x,y generating the ideal of p exists, over U the blowup is the incidence subscheme V(xv−yu)⊆U×kPk1 with charts Spec⁡R[T]/(xT−y)=Spec⁡R[y/x] and Spec⁡R[U1]/(yU1−x)=Spec⁡R[x/y] glued by TU1=1, the base change to Spec⁡OS,p is obtained by replacing R by OS,p, the charts are smooth surfaces over k, the local rings on E have the asserted dimensions, and the plane model has the two affine-plane charts inside Ak2×kPk1.

Remarks

  • The quotient chart description only requires the indicated regular sequence. Regularity at the point gives the exceptional projective line and its normal twist; smoothness of S and rationality of p give absolute smoothness of the blowup over k.
  • For a general closed point the local charts are over OS,p. The exceptional curve is over κ(p); the whole blowup need not have a κ(p)-algebra structure.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

93 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources