Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The normal bundle of the exceptional curve is O(-1)

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let p be a closed point of a regular surface S over a field k, assume dim⁡OS,p=2, and let π ⁣:S′→S be the blowup of p and E its exceptional curve. Then E is isomorphic to the projective line over κ(p), and the restriction to E of the invertible sheaf OS′(E) is the dual tautological bundle OPκ(p)1(−1); equivalently OE(E) has degree −1 and OE(−E)=O(1) has degree 1. For p k-rational, OE(E)=OPk1(−1) and this twist index is an isomorphism invariant of E.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A regular surface S over k, a closed point p∈S with two-dimensional local ring, the blowup π ⁣:S′→S of p with exceptional curve E and A=OS,p.

[A1]

Choice. The Axiom of Choice is assumed, as in the statement; the cited suppliers used below are stated under it (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Regular centers have projective-bundle exceptional divisors: For a closed point p of a regular surface S over a field k with two-dimensional local ring, the conormal sheaf I/I2=mp/mp2 is free of rank two over κ(p) and the exceptional divisor is isomorphic to the projective line Pκ(p)1 over κ(p); the corollary identifies it with the projective bundle PZ(I/I2) in the quotient convention.

[F3]

Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps, Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains, Flat base change for blowups, and failure without flatness and regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: The localized point blowup has charts A[(x,y)/x] and A[(x,y)/y] with inverse ratio overlap, where x,y are regular parameters and form a regular sequence in the domain A.

[F4]

Projective bundle in the quotient convention: The projective bundle of a finite locally free module E of rank r over S is the relative Proj PS(E)=Proj⁡SSym⁡(E)→S, in the quotient convention in which an S-morphism T→PS(E) amounts to an isomorphism class of surjections g∗E→L with L invertible on T.

[F5]

The twist index on the projective line is an isomorphism invariant: For the twists of the relative projective line over a field, OPk1(n)≅OPk1(m) if and only if n=m; hence the twist index attached to an invertible sheaf on Pk1 is an isomorphism invariant.

[F6]

Twisting sheaf on Proj: For a commutative nonnegatively graded ring S, the twisting sheaf on Proj⁡S is OX(n)=S(n)~, the associated sheaf of the shifted graded module, with Γ(D+(f),OX(n))=S(n)(f) on standard opens.

[F7]

The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier: For the blowup of a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf I of finite type with exceptional subscheme E=V(IOBl⁡): O(1) is invertible, the inverse-image ideal IOBl⁡ is invertible and equals O(1), and the exceptional divisor is effective Cartier with OBl⁡(−E)=IOBl⁡=O(1) and OBl⁡(E)=O(−1).

Proof

1.1A1F1F4F7

The inverse-image center ideal IOS′ is the invertible sheaf OS′(−E)≅O(1), and its dual is OS′(E)≅O(−1). The exceptional curve is the projective bundle of the rank-two cotangent space, hence becomes Pκ(p)1 on choosing a basis.

2.1F3F6F7step 1.1

Use regular parameters x,y. If xg=(xT−y)h, reduction modulo x forces h=xh1, and cancellation gives g=(xT−y)h1; hence the incidence quotient has no x-power torsion and is the x-chart. Symmetrically this proves the y-chart presentation. Thus use the charts A[T]/(xT−y) and A[U]/(yU−x), with U=T−1. The exceptional ideal has frames x and y on them. On restriction to E, these give frames e0=[x] and e1=[y] of IE/IE2=OE(−E); they are not functions x∣E or y∣E, which are zero. Their transition is e1=Te0, exactly the transition of the positive twist on Pκ(p)1. Thus OE(−E)≅O(1) and dualizing gives OE(E)≅O(−1).

3.1F5step 2.1∎

These twists have degrees 1 and −1 over κ(p), respectively. The uniqueness-of-twists lemma makes their indices isomorphism invariants. If p is rational, κ(p)=k and the same statements specialize to the asserted twists over k; no smoothness assumption on S is needed for this specialization.

Remarks

The local-dimension assumption is automatic for closed points of finite-type pure two-dimensional surfaces. At a closed point with one-dimensional local ring the blowup is the identity and the exceptional fiber is a point; there is no exceptional-curve degree assertion in that case.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources