How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
First blowup of the cusp y^2=x^3
Example
Let over a field of characteristic not . Blowing up the origin, in the chart with the total transform is , so the strict transform is the smooth parabola and it meets the exceptional curve at the single point with multiplicity ; in the other chart the strict transform does not meet . Thus after one blowup the cusp has become a regular curve tangent to , and a second point blowup of that tangency point makes the strict transforms of the curve and meet transversally with contact order one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field of characteristic not , the cuspidal plane curve , the blowup of the origin with exceptional curve , the two standard charts, and the strict transform .
Choice. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the blowup construction; the explicit chart computations below use no further choice. (The Axiom of Choice).
Strict-transform equation by removing the maximal exceptional power: In the chart with coordinates where , the total transform equation of a curve of multiplicity is with the leading form evaluated at , and the strict transform is defined by ; symmetrically in the other chart.
The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme: For the two standard charts are with and with , glued by inverting and with ; the exceptional divisor is and respectively and is .
Strict transform of a closed subscheme: The strict transform is the scheme-theoretic closure of the inverse image of the complement of the center; in a chart where the ideal of is invertible it is cut by the saturation of the inverse-image ideal by that ideal.
Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor: For a reduced plane curve of multiplicity at the blown-up point, ; equivalently the strict transform is obtained on each chart by dividing a local equation of the total transform by the -th power of an exceptional equation, and is cut by the degree- leading form of a local equation of the curve.
Strict transforms of plane curves record tangent directions: For a reduced plane curve through the origin of multiplicity and leading form , the scheme is cut out on by the form : its closed points correspond to the irreducible factors of , a factor of multiplicity contributes with multiplicity , and the -cycle has total degree .
A point blowup lowers pairwise contact order by one and separates transverse branches: For distinct regular curves through a point with contact order , the strict transforms under the blowup of that point meet at the point of the new exceptional curve corresponding to their common tangent direction, with contact order .
Verification
In the first chart of [F2] write , so the chart ring is with and , and let , a reduced equation of the cusp of multiplicity at the origin; substituting gives with not divisible by because its reduction modulo is , so by [F1] (or [F4]) the strict transform is cut in this chart by , and by [F3] the strict transform is the closure of the corresponding open part.
The curve is regular: its gradient never vanishes, so is the smooth parabola ; its intersection with in this chart is , the single point , and the local ring of there is with the equation of restricting to , so the contact order is ; both and are regular at this point with the same tangent line, so the curves are tangent there. This agrees with [F5]: the leading form of is , whose dehomogenization vanishes only at , with multiplicity , so is the single point of multiplicity .
In the second chart of [F2] write , so the chart ring is with and ; substituting gives , and the residual factor is a unit at every point of (where it equals ), so the strict transform has no points of in this chart.
The total transform identity of [F4] is visible in the two charts of steps 1.1 and 3.1: the pullback of factors as and as , the exceptional factor or contributing and the residual factor the strict transform; no other component of appears, since the residual factors do not vanish along .
The point at which is tangent to is a point at which the two distinct regular curves and meet with contact order ; blowing up this point, [F6] applies with and shows that the strict transforms of and of meet, at the point of the new exceptional curve corresponding to their common tangent direction, with contact order , that is, transversally: the tangency is separated by the second blowup.
Therefore in the first chart the strict transform is the smooth parabola , meeting at the single point with multiplicity , while in the second chart the strict transform does not meet ; the cusp has become a regular curve tangent to , and the second point blowup reduces the contact order of with to one, separating the tangency.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Strict-transform equation by removing the maximal exceptional power
- The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme
- Strict transform of a closed subscheme
- Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor
- Strict transforms of plane curves record tangent directions
- A point blowup lowers pairwise contact order by one and separates transverse branches
Used by
- Normalization and blowup are different operations Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, June 27, 2011 draft (author-hosted 'Early (out-of-date) version of The Rising Sea') (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10 (standard reference, not scraped)