Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First blowup of the cusp y^2=x^3

Example

Let C=V(y2−x3) over a field k of characteristic not 2. Blowing up the origin, in the chart with y=xs the total transform is x2(s2−x), so the strict transform is the smooth parabola s2=x and it meets the exceptional curve E=(x=0) at the single point s=0 with multiplicity 2; in the other chart the strict transform does not meet E. Thus after one blowup the cusp has become a regular curve tangent to E, and a second point blowup of that tangency point makes the strict transforms of the curve and E meet transversally with contact order one.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k of characteristic not 2, the cuspidal plane curve C=V(y2−x3)⊆Ak2, the blowup of the origin with exceptional curve E, the two standard charts, and the strict transform C′.

[A1]

Choice. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the blowup construction; the explicit chart computations below use no further choice. (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Strict-transform equation by removing the maximal exceptional power: In the chart with coordinates (x,s) where y=xs, the total transform equation of a curve of multiplicity m is f(x,xs)=xmg(x,s) with g(0,s)=fm(1,s) the leading form evaluated at (1,s), and the strict transform is defined by g=0; symmetrically in the other chart.

[F2]

The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme: For Bl⁡0Ak2 the two standard charts are Spec⁡k[x,T] with y=xT and Spec⁡k[y,U] with x=yU, glued by inverting T and U with TU=1; the exceptional divisor E is V(x) and V(y) respectively and is Pk1.

[F3]

Strict transform of a closed subscheme: The strict transform is the scheme-theoretic closure of the inverse image of the complement of the center; in a chart where the ideal of E is invertible it is cut by the saturation of the inverse-image ideal by that ideal.

[F4]

Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor: For a reduced plane curve of multiplicity m at the blown-up point, π∗C=C′+mE; equivalently the strict transform is obtained on each chart by dividing a local equation of the total transform by the m-th power of an exceptional equation, and C′∩E is cut by the degree-m leading form of a local equation of the curve.

[F5]

Strict transforms of plane curves record tangent directions: For a reduced plane curve C=V(f) through the origin of multiplicity m and leading form fm, the scheme C′∩E is cut out on E by the form fm: its closed points correspond to the irreducible factors of fm, a factor of multiplicity s contributes with multiplicity s, and the 0-cycle has total degree m.

[F6]

A point blowup lowers pairwise contact order by one and separates transverse branches: For distinct regular curves Y,Z through a point with contact order n>1, the strict transforms under the blowup of that point meet at the point of the new exceptional curve corresponding to their common tangent direction, with contact order n−1.

Verification

1.1A1F1F3F4given

In the first chart of [F2] write s=T=y/x, so the chart ring is k[x,s] with y=xs and E=V(x), and let f=y2−x3, a reduced equation of the cusp of multiplicity m=2 at the origin; substituting y=xs gives f(x,xs)=x2s2−x3=x2(s2−x) with s2−x not divisible by x because its reduction modulo x is s2≠0, so by [F1] (or [F4]) the strict transform is cut in this chart by g=s2−x, and by [F3] the strict transform is the closure of the corresponding open part.

2.1F4F5step 1.1

The curve g=s2−x=0 is regular: its gradient (−1,2s) never vanishes, so C′ is the smooth parabola x=s2; its intersection with E=V(x) in this chart is V(x,s2−x)=V(x,s2), the single point s=0, and the local ring of C′ there is k[s](s) with the equation of E restricting to s2, so the contact order is length⁡(k[s](s)/(s2))=2; both C′ and E are regular at this point with the same tangent line, so the curves are tangent there. This agrees with [F5]: the leading form of f is f2=y2, whose dehomogenization f2(1,s)=s2 vanishes only at s=0, with multiplicity 2, so C′∩E is the single point of multiplicity 2.

3.1F1F2step 2.1

In the second chart of [F2] write U=x/y, so the chart ring is k[y,U] with x=yU and E=V(y); substituting gives f=y2−y3U3=y2(1−yU3), and the residual factor 1−yU3 is a unit at every point of E (where y=0 it equals 1), so the strict transform has no points of E in this chart.

4.1F2F3F4step 1.1step 3.1

The total transform identity π∗C=C′+2E of [F4] is visible in the two charts of steps 1.1 and 3.1: the pullback of y2−x3 factors as x2(s2−x) and as y2(1−yU3), the exceptional factor x2 or y2 contributing 2E and the residual factor the strict transform; no other component of E appears, since the residual factors do not vanish along E.

5.1F6step 2.1step 4.1

The point V(x,s) at which C′ is tangent to E is a point at which the two distinct regular curves C′ and E meet with contact order n=2; blowing up this point, [F6] applies with n>1 and shows that the strict transforms of C′ and of E meet, at the point of the new exceptional curve corresponding to their common tangent direction, with contact order n−1=1, that is, transversally: the tangency is separated by the second blowup.

6.1step 2.1step 3.1step 5.1∎

Therefore in the first chart the strict transform is the smooth parabola s2=x, meeting E=(x=0) at the single point s=0 with multiplicity 2, while in the second chart the strict transform does not meet E; the cusp has become a regular curve tangent to E, and the second point blowup reduces the contact order of C′ with E to one, separating the tangency.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources